Jump to content

the ultimate 4G LTE tragedy


Recommended Posts

I've been with Sprint for years, I was so excited for the Evo

4g that I got it on launch day and proceeded to never get a wimax signal in my two year contract...

 

Still I kept hope and resigned hoping for a better deployment of LTE....well I got a 4g signal today and it lasts until I get to my garage.

 

I use an airave at home so I've never used or received mobile data at home but this is so frustrating and disappointing. Granted I use Wi-Fi but there's times my home internet is down and I was hoping to use LTE.

 

I waited all this time, finally got it, and it can only be used in my garage.

 

Not blaming Sprint here, just sharing my story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been with Sprint for years, I was so excited for the Evo

4g that I got it on launch day and proceeded to never get a wimax signal in my two year contract...

 

Still I kept hope and resigned hoping for a better deployment of LTE....well I got a 4g signal today and it lasts until I get to my garage.

 

I use an airave at home so I've never used or received mobile data at home but this is so frustrating and disappointing. Granted I use Wi-Fi but there's times my home internet is down and I was hoping to use LTE.

 

I waited all this time, finally got it, and it can only be used in my garage.

 

Not blaming Sprint here, just sharing my story

 

Where are you located?

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been with Sprint for years, I was so excited for the Evo

4g that I got it on launch day and proceeded to never get a wimax signal in my two year contract...

 

Still I kept hope and resigned hoping for a better deployment of LTE....well I got a 4g signal today and it lasts until I get to my garage.

 

I use an airave at home so I've never used or received mobile data at home but this is so frustrating and disappointing. Granted I use Wi-Fi but there's times my home internet is down and I was hoping to use LTE.

 

I waited all this time, finally got it, and it can only be used in my garage.

 

Not blaming Sprint here, just sharing my story

 

If not Sprint, then who do you blame?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been with Sprint for years, I was so excited for the Evo

4g that I got it on launch day and proceeded to never get a wimax signal in my two year contract...

 

Still I kept hope and resigned hoping for a better deployment of LTE....well I got a 4g signal today and it lasts until I get to my garage.

 

I use an airave at home so I've never used or received mobile data at home but this is so frustrating and disappointing. Granted I use Wi-Fi but there's times my home internet is down and I was hoping to use LTE.

 

I waited all this time, finally got it, and it can only be used in my garage.

 

Not blaming Sprint here, just sharing my story

 

You may be getting LTE from a far away cell site. When a closer site gets upgraded you will see better coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't really blame Sprint. I'm more upset about the wimax deployment because I never got it and they gave up on it.

 

At least with LTE I can see the growth and eventually it will be more widespread.I

 

Sprint gave me an airave so I can't really blame them since they're making an effort.

 

Robert I'm in diamond bar which is 20-30 miles outside of los Angeles.

 

I also live in a house right next to a hill so that could play a part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't really blame Sprint. I'm more upset about the wimax deployment because I never got it and they gave up on it.

 

At least with LTE I can see the growth and eventually it will be more widespread.I

 

Sprint gave me an airave so I can't really blame them since they're making an effort.

 

Robert I'm in diamond bar which is 20-30 miles outside of los Angeles.

 

I also live in a house right next to a hill so that could play a part.

ohh man..my cousin lives there and Seriously Sprint has to do something in that areas...service sucks there..big time...But if u check on sensorly LTE is getting closer to you..there is are live signals on the 57 and by san antonio college.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't really blame Sprint. I'm more upset about the wimax deployment because I never got it and they gave up on it.

 

At least with LTE I can see the growth and eventually it will be more widespread.I

 

Sprint gave me an airave so I can't really blame them since they're making an effort.

 

Robert I'm in diamond bar which is 20-30 miles outside of los Angeles.

 

I also live in a house right next to a hill so that could play a part.

 

 

I can't really blame Sprint. I'm more upset about the wimax deployment because I never got it and they gave up on it.

 

At least with LTE I can see the growth and eventually it will be more widespread.I

 

Sprint gave me an airave so I can't really blame them since they're making an effort.

 

Robert I'm in diamond bar which is 20-30 miles outside of los Angeles.

 

I also live in a house right next to a hill so that could play a part.

 

The tragedy was blaming Sprint for wimax, that was out of their control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just thought it would work here when it was deployed.

 

My house is a weird location because friends with Verizon and ATT

notice huge dips in service when they're at my house.

 

The only service that works really well here is t mobile.

 

My sister in law got 17mbps down with a prepaid card from Wal-Mart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

The tragedy was blaming Sprint for wimax, that was out of their control.

 

I understand it's clear wire but why can't I blame Sprint?

Everything pointed to LTE as the future, they took a gamble no one else took and it clearly back fired.

They might not have been in charge of wimax deployment but investing in it was poor judgment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tragedy was blaming Sprint for wimax, that was out of their control.

 

Yeah Clearwire kinda screwed over all of the companies that invested in WiMax. Sprint is just the biggest one that people think about. Time Warner, Comcast, Intel, Bright House and Google all own or previously owned parts of Clearwire, and they all sunk money into the company to deploy the WiMax network..

 

Sprint just happens to own the majority (50.8%), but does not have voting majority. Sprint can't unilaterally decide the direction of the company regardless of their majority stake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wifi covers all of my house, yard, and even 3 or 4 seconds houses down the street and the houses aren't slammed pack close where you can hear your neighbors fart from your kitchen. No need for LTE at home.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wifi covers all of my house, yard, and even 3 or 4 seconds houses down the street and the houses aren't slammed pack close where you can hear your neighbors fart from your kitchen. No need for LTE at home.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

Yes but we cheat and use UBIQ gear.

And for the record i want LTE at my house, i don't want to use it but i do want to have it.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I understand it's clear wire but why can't I blame Sprint?

Everything pointed to LTE as the future, they took a gamble no one else took and it clearly back fired.

They might not have been in charge of wimax deployment but investing in it was poor judgment

 

There was a reason for that which has been gone over time and again, but it really doesn't even matter at this point.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wifi covers all of my house, yard, and even 3 or 4 seconds houses down the street and the houses aren't slammed pack close where you can hear your neighbors fart from your kitchen. No need for LTE at home.

 

Sent from my little Note2

I've got to ask, what for wifi router do you use? I need a higher powered one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My LTE stops right as I walk into my house, but it just went live on my tower so I'm sure it's not 100% yet so I can't get too mad, but it doesn't improve with it is completed then I will surely be pissed. And I only get it within a few block radius so it's obviously still in testing, my other tower a few miles away must not have LTE installed yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert I'm in diamond bar which is 20-30 miles outside of los Angeles.

 

There is your problem. Diamond Bar is one of those communities where permits are a bear to secure. However, that may be a thing of the past if enough young people have moved there to make a difference. I had a friend who lived there, and at their house, Cingular was terrible. AT&T Wireless was good on TDMA years ago.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

There is your problem. Diamond Bar is one of those communities where permits are a bear to secure. However, that may be a thing of the past if enough young people have moved there to make a difference. I had a friend who lived there, and at their house, Cingular was terrible. AT&T Wireless was good on TDMA years ago.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

Interesting...can you provide more info on this?

Diamond bar was also one of the cities to strongly protest the building of a football stadium that was planned nearby in the city of industry. I'm pretty sure that's why they're planning to build one in L.A. Live instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but we cheat and use UBIQ gear.

And for the record i want LTE at my house, i don't want to use it but i do want to have it.

 

That's not cheating... just using real gear. The hell with that kiddie Netgear, Linksys, Buffalo, etc stuff. Funny thing is Ubiquiti stuff is priced very well. I still can't get over the Nanostation Loco M2 price and the other crazy shots I've pulled with their stuff. There's no going back. I do use an Asus RT-N66U though for my main router though. That thing is a beast with the various tasks of OpenVPN (for open wifi android usage), SSH tunnels, 3 VLANs, NAS, adblocking, stats, FTP, multi-SSID's, and other things I've probably forgotten. Never bogs down.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Interesting...can you provide more info on this?

Diamond bar was also one of the cities to strongly protest the building of a football stadium that was planned nearby in the city of industry. I'm pretty sure that's why they're planning to build one in L.A. Live instead.

 

Like the City if Henderson, people are strongly against cell towers for the same reason, they are tin foil hat people. A lot of retirement communities are that way. But progressively the populations in those areas are getting younger, so tensions are easing, and it's hopefully going to open the door to expansions in those cities. The other factor that could play a part is denser foliage over the decades.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may have to look into getting a better router as well. Ours, apparently (after reading what some of you are saying) sucks! But, regarding having LTE at home...honestly that's where most Americans are likely to use it. I'm fairly certain when the carriers claim the # of people they cover, they're referring to where they live. That's important to most people, including myself, regardless of whether you happen to agree with it or not. Differences are what makes the world go round.

 

Now, do I use wifi? Sure, but it's really slow. So is the wifi at work. My 4G wimax connection in 4 times faster. Our wifi at home averages 2.75 mbps down on my phone and the same at work. My wimax averages 11-13 mbps down at work and at home. So, yeah, I skip wifi and use 4G during peak times when my roomies are home and wifi speeds are slow. Again, most people will find it important to have LTE at home. There's no rule saying we all have to agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That's not cheating... just using real gear. The hell with that kiddie Netgear, Linksys, Buffalo, etc stuff. Funny thing is Ubiquiti stuff is priced very well. I still can't get over the Nanostation Loco M2 price and the other crazy shots I've pulled with their stuff. There's no going back. I do use an Asus RT-N66U though for my main router though. That thing is a beast with the various tasks of OpenVPN (for open wifi android usage), SSH tunnels, 3 VLANs, NAS, adblocking, stats, FTP, multi-SSID's, and other things I've probably forgotten. Never bogs down.

 

I have no router in my home. I have an access point down the hill and across the stream from me. Get excellent signal all through the home and all over my neighborhood for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, do I use wifi? Sure, but it's really slow. So is the wifi at work. My 4G wimax connection in 4 times faster. Our wifi at home averages 2.75 mbps down on my phone and the same at work. My wimax averages 11-13 mbps down at work and at home. So, yeah, I skip wifi and use 4G during peak times when my roomies are home and wifi speeds are slow. Again, most people will find it important to have LTE at home. There's no rule saying we all have to agree.

 

You use 4G (WiMAX) at home because Wi-Fi is "really slow"?

 

Well, as more people do what you do, get ready for 4G (WiMAX or LTE) to become "really slow," too. Your solution turns into the problem.

 

Foresight is key, but I find that many people do not care to or are not able to look beyond the here and now.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clear started a lot of that crap. Use our 4G instead of buying a landline. All good until their ill-built network was oversold and causing Sprint grief. Was grabbing the money worth it for Clear? No.

 

As far as the state of WiFi, it sucks in lots of places because it's AT&T WiFi. I wish the other carriers would be more aggressive in building out carrier WiFi in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clear started a lot of that crap. Use our 4G instead of buying a landline. All good until their ill-built network was oversold and causing Sprint grief. Was grabbing the money worth it for Clear? No.

 

As far as the state of WiFi, it sucks in lots of places because it's AT&T WiFi. I wish the other carriers would be more aggressive in building out carrier WiFi in the US.

I think that's what Sprints long term goals are for td-lte. Set up deals with chain restaurants and event centers to get td-lte micro cells in every high usage area to clear up the rest of the macro network.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Great job on your analysis of small cells versus the 3.45GHZ and the population coverage requirements. I wonder if the fcc is stalling because they may address the key limitation of of 2.5: the convoluted frequencies. Not sure how they would get there, but it would be better public policy if you could actually use a single license in current times, ie 5, 10 or 20MHz. Of course they could also go in more of a nonprofit or small business direction. But most likely they will keep it as planned given how messy the transition would be. In many/most metro areas BRS/EBS is fully licensed. Would be nice if they put pressure on the squatters.
    • I didn't actually look at the buildout requirements before making that comment - they're definitely going to have to deploy on macro sites if they want to hit the buildout requirements. PEA001 has a population of 25,237,061, of which they will have to hit 45% in 4 years (11,356,677) and 80% in 8 years (20,189,649). If they were to cover the entirely, all five boroughs, of NYC using only small cells (something I'd say is impossible considering their current small cell density), they'd only be covering 32% of the population in the PEA. And this is with spectrum that only adds 300Mb/s per sector and will likely have only 50% the range of their current n41 equipment. Doesn't really seem worth it to me. I'm of the opinion that they're looking to hedge their bets in further EBS/BRS acquisition. 
    • These strand mounts also are deployed with Band 46 (LAA), in my experience. I have yet to encounter a strand mount with exclusively 2/66. 
    • Bought a esim "sim" card a few weeks ago that operates in all of my more current phones according to its app. It arrived a couple of weeks early from Berlin.  Now if my MVNOs would get moving and support more than iPhones and rarely Pixels so I can test this thing. https://esim.me The only item really troubling so far is reviews in google play store keep getting deleted, even 5 star ones.
    • Still waiting impatiently for my T-Mobile security update.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...