Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Upper Central Valley Market (Sacramento, Stockton, Redding, Eureka & Reno/Lake Tahoe)


iwalkthrowwalls

Recommended Posts

I've been getting regular LTE coverage at home off Hazel near Sunset for the last month. I had a few moments of LTE at work near Madison and Dewey back in December, but nothing since then. I'm sure it's just a matter of time. I used to get decent WIMAX speeds there when I had an HTC Evo. I have an LG G2 now and have enabled all three bands (25,26,41). The priority is currently set in that order. Is this the best setting for our area, or should I turn off one any of the bands and/or change the priority? I do update the PRL regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this time, would it be beneficial to purchase a triband/Spark Sprint phone, i.e. would it be able to pick up more than one band?

Yes. Anyone who stays with a single band or dual band (iPhone 5s/5c) device is asking to have a miserable experience.

 

There is not enough pcs spectrum here to deploy a second pcs lte carrier and smr 800 is limited as well.

 

What we do have here is an existing clear network that can be utilized in place to give immediate capacity offloading via band 41 TDD LTE (spark) while in the long run it'll be sprints own network deployment with the new 8 pipe radios and advanced technologies with band 41 that'll keep the user experience pleasant.

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Anyone who stays with a single band or dual band (iPhone 5s/5c) device is asking to have a miserable experience.

 

If that's the case, I'm hoping the new iphone will be triband/Spark enabled. ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asaguy, I just checked Sprints coverage map...still shows 3g to me

thats what i mean't. As in NV 3G in all of sacramento is now live, not LTE. Everyone on the forums were talking about a sacramento cluster launch occurring a few days ago and sprint updated their map to show the cluster did in fact come alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats what i mean't. As in NV 3G in all of sacramento is now live, not LTE. Everyone on the forums were talking about a sacramento cluster launch occurring a few days ago and sprint updated their map to show the cluster did in fact come alive.

So LTE shouldn't be too far away, mid - October IMO.

 

I just can't wait for LTE deployed over 800mhz. Better LTE speeds and better coverage. Any thoughts on when 800 LTE might be up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused....we already have had 3G

Cluster launched simply means that all the hardware has been changed with the new equipment. Has no bearing on LTE. LTE follows (after a few weeks typically) after a cluster launch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My sprint Rep days Spark will be here soon. And he mentioned how many towers lit up this week.

 

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

Lots of clear b41sites that have been turned off for a while. Once those goes back live they can announce it as spark.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of clear b41sites that have been turned off for a while. Once those goes back live they can announce it as spark.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Why is it that b41 in elk grove super slow? Max 10 download.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it that b41 in elk grove super slow? Max 10 download.

Clear.

 

They were not upgraded to sprint standard.

 

Some have upgraded backhaul and tops out at 40-60 Mbps and others have old wimax backhaul and tops out at 10-20 Mbps.

 

Sprints own 2.5 will easily reach 100/14.7.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clear.

 

They were not upgraded to sprint standard.

 

Some have upgraded backhaul and tops out at 40-60 Mbps and others have old wimax backhaul and tops out at 10-20 Mbps.

 

Sprints own 2.5 will easily reach 100/14.7.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

100 without carrier aggregation?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is clear's max speeds lower? Are the ratios not the same?

 

Clear.

They were not upgraded to sprint standard.

Some have upgraded backhaul and tops out at 40-60 Mbps and others have old wimax backhaul and tops out at 10-20 Mbps.

Sprints own 2.5 will easily reach 100/14.7.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clear.

 

They were not upgraded to sprint standard.

 

Some have upgraded backhaul and tops out at 40-60 Mbps and others have old wimax backhaul and tops out at 10-20 Mbps.

 

Sprints own 2.5 will easily reach 100/14.7.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Oh ok

 

And by sprints own are you referring to the 8t8r technology?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh ok

 

And by sprints own are you referring to the 8t8r technology?

That is correct.

 

The existing clear network is ran on Huawei equipment which can be software upgraded for band 41.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So LTE shouldn't be too far away, mid - October IMO.

 

I just can't wait for LTE deployed over 800mhz. Better LTE speeds and better coverage. Any thoughts on when 800 LTE might be up?

Hope this is right. Dang near bailed on Sprint tonight. I'll hold on another couple months...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...