Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

Not an lte booster. A wifi router.

 

 

Router or a booster, your pick

 

Well the CellSpot thing was the majorly-publicized part of Uncarrier 7. However, one thing they didn't publicize well was how they now offer LTE signal boosters:

 

https://support.t-mobile.com/docs/DOC-14947

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the CellSpot thing was the majorly-publicized part of Uncarrier 7. However, one thing they didn't publicize well was how they now offer LTE signal boosters:

 

https://support.t-mobile.com/docs/DOC-14947

I have one being shipped to me and I can't wait
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically you are eager to be a micro cell for T-Mobile, in which you pay for the broadband to run that on also while paying T-Mobile for your service to, sounds good to me.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically you are eager to be a micro cell for T-Mobile, in which you pay for the broadband to run that on also while paying T-Mobile for your service to, sounds good to me.

Lte booster does not require broadband

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rwad

So basically you are eager to be a micro cell for T-Mobile, in which you pay for the broadband to rib that on also whole paying T-Mobile for your service to, sounds good to me.

the only reason why I got it is because there is service issues going on because of the upgrades going on but afterwards I would return it plus volte is active in my area once the issues are resolved I will return it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically you are eager to be a micro cell for T-Mobile, in which you pay for the broadband to run that on also while paying T-Mobile for your service to, sounds good to me.

 

They offer two different things. One is the cell booster, like I'm talking about. What you're talking about is the CellSpot, which is their equivalent of the Airave plus wi-fi calling, etc.

 

Edit: I'd be eager to be a micro cell for either Sprint or T-Mobile. In this case, I wouldn't get the CellSpot because my home internet, based off VZW's 3G network, can't handle it. However, I can see your point how it's excessive to have to pay for their service and pay for broadband internet to make it usable.

 

But I'm all for using cell boosters to give myself, as well as anyone who visits, a better signal. :)

Edited by BlackBerryRulez
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically you are eager to be a micro cell for T-Mobile, in which you pay for the broadband to run that on also while paying T-Mobile for your service to, sounds good to me.

The CellSpot Router is just an ASUS RT-AC86U with special prioritization settings to ensure quality of service for Wi-Fi Calling that is available for free to postpaid customers or $99 for everyone else (as opposed to $220 for the RT-AC86U). The CellSpot Signal Booster is a variant of the Cel-Fi RS3 that repeats PCS and AWS WCDMA+LTE signal and boosts it for in-home coverage. The router obviously needs an internet connection, but the signal booster does not.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They offer two different things. One is the cell booster, like I'm talking about. What you're talking about is the CellSpot, which is their equivalent of the Airave plus wi-fi calling, etc.

 

Edit: I'd be eager to be a micro cell for either Sprint or T-Mobile. In this case, I wouldn't get the CellSpot because my home internet, based off VZW's 3G network, can't handle it. However, I can see your point how it's excessive to have to pay for their service and pay for broadband internet to make it usable.

 

But I'm all for using cell boosters to give myself, as well as anyone who visits, a better signal. :)

I usually get full service at my house but since the network upgrades are going on i ll accept the it and When the upgrades are done I ll return it and sprint is in big trouble because there lte is non existant ...they better hurry up
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They offer two different things. One is the cell booster, like I'm talking about. What you're talking about is the CellSpot, which is their equivalent of the Airave plus wi-fi calling, etc.

 

Edit: I'd be eager to be a micro cell for either Sprint or T-Mobile. In this case, I wouldn't get the CellSpot because my home internet, based off VZW's 3G network, can't handle it. However, I can see your point how it's excessive to have to pay for their service and pay for broadband internet to make it usable.

 

But I'm all for using cell boosters to give myself, as well as anyone who visits, a better signal. :)

The CellSpot Router is just an ASUS RT-AC86U with special prioritization settings to ensure quality of service for Wi-Fi Calling that is available for free to postpaid customers or $99 for everyone else (as opposed to $220 for the RT-AC86U). The CellSpot Signal Booster is a variant of the Cel-Fi RS3 that repeats PCS and AWS WCDMA+LTE signal and boosts it for in-home coverage. The router obviously needs an internet connection, but the signal booster does not.

plus I didn't even have to pay a deposit I got it for free and had it shipped for free
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CellSpot Router is just an ASUS RT-AC86U with special prioritization settings to ensure quality of service for Wi-Fi Calling that is available for free to postpaid customers or $99 for everyone else (as opposed to $220 for the RT-AC86U). The CellSpot Signal Booster is a variant of the Cel-Fi RS3 that repeats PCS and AWS WCDMA+LTE signal and boosts it for in-home coverage. The router obviously needs an internet connection, but the signal booster does not.

 

Good to know. Thanks for the details. I wish Sprint would update their offering.. though you can get good speeds with the Airave, if you have a fast home internet connection.

 

I usually get full service at my house but since the network upgrades are going on i ll accept the it and When the upgrades are done I ll return it and sprint is in big trouble because there lte is non existant ...they better hurry up

 

Just check out the Sensorly coverage maps.. Sprint LTE is out there, in a lot of places. There is detailed information on this forum about the extent of Sprint's LTE..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know. Thanks for the details. I wish Sprint would update their offering.. though you can get good speeds with the Airave, if you have a fast home internet connection.

 

 

Just check out the Sensorly coverage maps.. Sprint LTE is out there, in a lot of places. There is detailed information on this forum about the extent of Sprint's LTE..

I had a triband boost mobile phone and even my brother's sprint 5s got one bar of 3g ...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know. Thanks for the details. I wish Sprint would update their offering.. though you can get good speeds with the Airave, if you have a fast home internet connection.

 

Why would anyone use their Airave for 3G data instead of their own WiFi connection? My Airave does reach a bit further than my router, but I would never intentionally use data through it when I have 85mbps available via WiFi.

 

I do wish Sprint would release a LTE femtocell. Not because I want to use it for data, but because my Nexus 5 will randomly scan and pick up super weak B25 LTE if I don't forget to change the phone to 3G only and I've missed some calls because of it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would anyone use their Airave for 3G data instead of their own WiFi connection? My Airave does reach a bit further than my router, but I would never intentionally use data through it when I have 85mbps available via WiFi.

 

I do wish Sprint would release a LTE femtocell. Not because I want to use it for data, but because my Nexus 5 will randomly scan and pick up super weak B25 LTE if I don't forget to change the phone to 3G only and I've missed some calls because of it.

sprint needs alot of work in my town....when they actually get LTE in my town i ll come back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomorrow should be interesting.

 

So with their wideband LTE, it's basically repurposed Metro spectrum + their own holdings?

That's correct. They've squeezed CDMA down to a single 1X carrier at the bottom of the AWS C block, put LTE on AWS C+D+E+lower third of F, and squeezed DC-HSPA+ onto the upper two-thirds of AWS F.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's correct. They've squeezed CDMA down to a single 1X carrier at the bottom of the AWS C block, put LTE on AWS C+D+E+lower third of F, and squeezed DC-HSPA+ onto the upper two-thirds of AWS F.

 

and this is being broadcasted on every T-Mo site in the NYC market for example?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and this is being broadcasted on every T-Mo site in the NYC market for example?

Hopefully by now, yes. Instances of it started showing up three months ago. Given that a good number of them can be reconfigured remotely, I would hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's correct. They've squeezed CDMA down to a single 1X carrier at the bottom of the AWS C block, put LTE on AWS C+D+E+lower third of F, and squeezed DC-HSPA+ onto the upper two-thirds of AWS F.

 

Those are going to be some wonky EARFCNs and UARFCNs.  I would like to see some engineering screenshots.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully by now, yes. Instances of it started showing up three months ago. Given that a good number of them can be reconfigured remotely, I would hope so.

i like the healthy competition and also t mobile has started that process XD i never used to get 50 megs a second on my samsung device 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, it's like Groundhog Day in here...

isnt that the truth :)

 

danlodish345, you probably do not realize it, but that could be in reference to you.  When all you ever post, like a broken record, is how T-Mobile presently works well in your area but Sprint presently does not, it may be time to stop loitering in the T-Mobile thread at S4GRU and move along.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully by now, yes. Instances of it started showing up three months ago. Given that a good number of them can be reconfigured remotely, I would hope so.

konan what market do you reside in ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am liking what Tmobile is doing in snatching up more 700 MHz A-block markets.  They still need to snatch up the Chicago license from Leap and buy out all the 700 MHz licenses from AB License Co LLC, Cavalier License Group LLC, and Continuum 700. 

 

How is the wideband LTE coverage in NYC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...