Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Delaware market (including Wilmington, Dover, Laurel and Elkton MD)


cjinohio03

Recommended Posts

I have had Sensorly on for three day's if you look there is no 4g pings south of the canal or west of the Md/Del line south of the canal. Then go to Sprints owns coverage map and look at their 4g coverage for this part of the county they show proly three quarters of the total land mass below the canal in Cecil county as having 4g. Nothing but bull-shart. I went down every road in this whole part of the county in the last 3 days and never once not even for a second saw 4g had the phone stuck to the windshield the whole time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why a Premier Sponsor would use Sprint coverage maps when they have access to S4GRU Site Acceptance maps is beyond me. Everyone knows that the Sprint LTE coverage maps are awful unless you zoom all the way in and only count Best coverage. Even AJ is first to admit that Sprint LTE maps overstate coverage.

 

I cannot believe an educated S4GRU member would buy a device and expect magical coverage to appear when it is commonly said over and over again how Sprint LTE coverage maps are not good. Nothing about a new device is going to make unaccepted sites turn on.

 

 

Posted using iPhone 5s on Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like towers in 4g area tha are not upgraded yet , your bound to drop 3g or 800lte thats low power at the time ,aka poor coverage. This why i map upper md and de for last year and half so real world lte can be shown in thst area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duh . Look there is no towers around with lte in your area middletown is close lte . Sprint maps are garbage.

 Sprint maps are garbage. My point too a tee they I/E Sprint should be ashamed to show 4g coverage here. They only do it to pray on the might dollar.They will not get a penny from me. My wife and son have give them to much already they will be out of contract come 4/20/15,might have get them some new phone's on Verizon or AT&T. 4/20 is a good day indeed national weed day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why a Premier Sponsor would use Sprint coverage maps when they have access to S4GRU Site Acceptance maps is beyond me. Everyone knows that the Sprint LTE coverage maps are awful unless you zoom all the way in and only count Best coverage. Even AJ is first to admit that Sprint LTE maps overstate coverage.

 

I cannot believe an educated S4GRU member would buy a device and expect magical coverage to appear when it is commonly said over and over again how Sprint LTE coverage maps are not good. Nothing about a new device is going to make unaccepted sites turn on.

 

 

Posted using iPhone 5s on Tapatalk

Educated I am not,but I will not pay a penny and have not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news i just saved money on my car insurance lol. Good luck with verizon or att. I got lte tower right across the street waiting on 2500mhz panels to be added. I feel your pain but complaining on this site is pointless, s4gru is just a info site and not sprint. I wish robert was like the wizard of oz and grant are wishes.best place complain is facebook with rest people like sprint page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good news i just saved money on my car insurance lol. Good luck with verizon or att. I got lte tower right across the street waiting on 2500mhz panels to be added. I feel your pain but complaining on this site is pointless, s4gru is just a info site and not sprint. I wish robert was like the wizard of oz and grant are wishes.best place complain is facebook with rest people like sprint page.

I be getting some good laughs reading ppl posts on Sprint's Facebook page.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 Plus using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i have all week seeing ow network is in delaware , this moring i notice some sites band 41 powerup and getting signal far from towers now. Def going check things out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like another tower went live today by Carter Rd in Smyrna and one by Cheswold. Will need to have it confirmed. My phone also remained on LTE all the way from Smyrna through Dover on Rt13, which is great.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's true but before April 1, I couldn't get a consistent LTE signal inside my friend's home on Carter Rd. It would switch back and forth to 3G until now. Also there was a stretch between Garrison's Lake to Cheswold on Rt13 where I could only pick up 3G but now it remained on LTE. I also experienced this by the Dover Fire Department/Foxhall on Kenton Rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds maybe like they got 800 MHz going there. Think that's what I need on the red mill tower, since I still get not lte at work...maybe soon

 

Most of the sites in the Dover have B26 LTE live, recently (from what I can tell) they have begun turning up the power on those sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pick up any band 41 in dover oriddle town yet ?

 

At least one of the sites is live, but the power is way down and speeds are about the same as B25 & B26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...