Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - SF Bay Market


breakaes

Recommended Posts

Sweet! But now b25 is gonna be swamped. Again. Now we just need more backhaul!!

 

You don't need more backhaul. You need more macro sites, more pico sites (small cells), and more importantly the LTE carriers on B41. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't need more backhaul. You need more macro sites, more pico sites (small cells), and more importantly the LTE carriers on B41.

I think he's saying that now more sites need to receive their upgraded backhaul. At least that's how I read it.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's saying that now more sites need to receive their upgraded backhaul. At least that's how I read it.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

Read his message wrong but it's still a very valid statement of what Sprint needs to do in my honest opinion. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't need more backhaul. You need more macro sites, more pico sites (small cells), and more importantly the LTE carriers on B41. 

 

Actually, I think SF upgrades are much smoother than in other places where B25 towers go up one by one.  In those markets (like San Jose area), a B25 tower goes up and LTE signal would cover area typically spanned by 4-5 surrounding towers - leaving little LTE bandwidth in the end for a device that locks onto it.  It would actually make 3G service much better as all the LTE devices in that area would battle for a sliver of 5x5 LTE freeing up 3G.

 

Today, in SF, there are many B41 towers.  B41 is VERY capable of providing bandwidth equivalent of 4-5 B25 LTE towers.  Looking at LTE Discovery app (which I'm liking much more than SCP), there's something near 3rd & I-80 in SOMA that's blanketing area as far as 7th & Townsend with useful speeds.  With eCSFB up, it's a better experience than what SF has suffered with for the last two years where single LTE towers would struggle with the load.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think with CSFB working and B41 available (probably?) during my commute. I think I'm almost ready to kill my T-Mobile service and switch back to Sprint :)

 

I wonder if the rest of the 3G only sites that are live in SF are just waiting for integration techs or if backhaul still isn't there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think with CSFB working and B41 available (probably?) during my commute. I think I'm almost ready to kill my T-Mobile service and switch back to Sprint :)

 

I wonder if the rest of the 3G only sites that are live in SF are just waiting for integration techs or if backhaul still isn't there.

I'd give it one more month. What is your commute?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.dropbox.com/s/jijrtgf0ogyamsa/2014-08-13%2005.22.31.png

 

Forgot to post this last night.

West Oakland close to 12th St

It's everywhere. And powerful too, I catch the same B26 tower at home in Mission Bay and at Macarthur BART.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to see the hotel I built in Downtown Napa is still standing. Although, I wouldn't have wanted to be in it. I never liked the type of steel structural support system that the structural engineer designed. It must have sounded awful as the building moved.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the 5.1 hit Virginia, those of us in NYC felt it too and panicked. People were standing in the street waiting for buildings to crumble since we don't experience them very often. I guess I can add that to the list of things I've experienced in NYC: 

 

Floods, Hurricanes, Tornadoes, Blizzards, and an Earthquake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't feel a thing when I was in upper Manhattan for that earthquake. This one in sf was scary. It was like being a bus and train passed right under my apt for 20 seconds.

 

What's crazy is that, I was on the phone with a friend from North Carolina who was telling me his house is shaking and about 10 seconds later my house started shaking. My aunt claimed she didn't feel a thing but still ran because everyone else was. A lot of people didn't notice it but I certainly did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...