Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Indianapolis Market


omega

Recommended Posts

Ladies and gentleman. I am pleased to announce......

 

DANVILLE HAS SPRINT LTE. Strong LTE.

 

I got outbof best buy and installed sensorly. Drove straight home.

 

Should see my mapping sometime soon I hope.

 

I also scored an S3 for a PENNY on a pricematch with Amazon. Also met a cute girl there too.

 

Bedtime and will chat tonight after I get to work. This morning has been an ultra win for me.

 

i did the same thing the week before when bestbuy had the 50.00 deal on all carriers. i left verizon to go to sprint for unlimited and had to wait about 3 hours but had them match amazon for a 1 cent on all 5 of my galaxy s3's on my plan. it was alot easier than i thought. walked out with 5 s3's and only paid a nickel. now i just need lte in greenfield

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i did the same thing the week before when bestbuy had the 50.00 deal on all carriers. i left verizon to go to sprint for unlimited and had to wait about 3 hours but had them match amazon for a 1 cent on all 5 of my galaxy s3's on my plan. it was alot easier than i thought. walked out with 5 s3's and only paid a nickel. now i just need lte in greenfield

 

Yeah I went over to Dayton last night, and didn't have LTE at all, once I got a bit into Hancock County.

 

But otherwise, I'm satisfied so far!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I went over to Dayton last night, and didn't have LTE at all, once I got a bit into Hancock County.

 

But otherwise, I'm satisfied so far!

 

i get great lte along 70. i have to toggle the moble data in the notification bar sometimes to get the lte to kick back in but it will go out past knightstown exit at 109 i know for sure. there are towers just west from greenfield along 70 and just east of greenfield along 70 that are putting out. i can also get it all the way out 40 till i get almost to the west edge of town. pretty much what sensorly shows. 40 and mount comfort of was getting over 30mb down along with i70 about 2 miles east of greenfield around the rest stop

crazy thing is i live only about 2 miles south west of the one to the east of greenfield and barely get a signal when i check the debug and its not enough to get the phone to pick it up and connect. i just assume these are directed along the interstate and dont put out to the south because i can hold on to that tower for 10 miles to the east but not at my house.

went to the one here in the center of town that shows in progress but there are 3 towers there within 100 ft. and there are no signs. gonna snoop around tomarrow and get better pictures with my camera and post them if they get the commercial area there in plowed so i can drive back there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint coverage maps shows 4g lte on there website in area code 46259 indianapolis but this is not the case. What up with that.

 

There maps are over stating coverage in most cases. Check out sensorly for more real life coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint coverage maps shows 4g lte on there website in area code 46259 indianapolis but this is not the case. What up with that.

ive got the same thing in greenfield. im miles inside solid coverage but as soon as i jump off of 70 i loose lte after about 100 feet. they are saying they have coverage on towers that are just scheduled to be done. mine is in progress here in greenfield.

 

once you sponsor and donate atleast 5 dollars you get access to the sponsor forums where there are updated site maps with progress. lots of info for finding out where your area might be at. you can find the tower and take a look and see where there progess is at.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drove from Cincinnati to Franklin Indiana today for work and signal has improved a ton on I-74 right before Shelbyville. Before there was about a 10 mile dead zone for me and now its almost full strength 3G. Also, right at the exit for Shelbyville there is a cell tower. I saw what looked like Sprint antennas laying on the ground so it looks like they will be getting LTE there here soon.

 

I have marked the tower on this Google Maps

https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ll=39.524984,-85.736194&spn=0.00092,0.002236&t=h&z=20&vpsrc=6&iwloc=0004d26b23b9d75b93cf0&msa=0&msid=215114600708536080953.0004d26b2114ba869e759

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drove from Cincinnati to Franklin Indiana today for work and signal has improved a ton on I-74 right before Shelbyville. Before there was about a 10 mile dead zone for me and now its almost full strength 3G. Also' date=' right at the exit for Shelbyville there is a cell tower. I saw what looked like Sprint antennas laying on the ground so it looks like they will be getting LTE there here soon.

 

I have marked the tower on this Google Maps

https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ll=39.524984,-85.736194&spn=0.00092,0.002236&t=h&z=20&vpsrc=6&iwloc=0004d26b23b9d75b93cf0&msa=0&msid=215114600708536080953.0004d26b2114ba869e759

 

Unless its going to be a brand new site, it isn't one currently. If your back in the area and can, grab some pics of what you see!

 

Sent from my EVO LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will try today. I usually drive by when its dark so my phone would take a really bad picture. I also wouldnt be surprised if it was a brand new one, like I said, I usually had really horrible service (either no bars or 1 bar) in that area. I have seem some pictures of other Sprint antennas and they look exactly the same. Not sure how similar Sprint's are to other carriers though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drove by the site today, they had lifted 1 side of the antenna up already. If they are any still on the ground when I leave today I will try and snag a picture.

 

Awesome!

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a shot of the backside of the antenna and radios being used in Indy. This one is on a rooftop in Carmel. For a time you will see the old and the new antennas on the tower.

 

20121130_093502.jpg

I don't see anything

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see anything

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Maybe I can't post links to content yet. I hate being a newb on a forum all over again. I'll try again and see what happens, maybe it was an issue with linking back to an image stores on xda's server.

 

Since on on my other computer this time, I added a picture of antenna that has it's RRUs mounted to the monopole

 

20121130_093502.jpg

 

Antenna.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a high capacity sector near the airport(Minnesota and Lyndhurst). There's an extra antenna and an additional PCS RRU. This appears to be the north facing sector.

 

hi-cap%2520Antenna.jpg

Edited by jeremyandrew
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

just started getting lte in greenfield today. its in and out today obviously and its a good signal but weak speeds. with all the crazy coverage north of 70 in the open countryside i would think the populated area would get atleast as good of coverage. given any buildings in the way.

this is tower that is in the center of greenfield that is in progress on the map

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just started getting lte in greenfield today. its in and out today obviously and its a good signal but weak speeds. with all the crazy coverage north of 70 in the open countryside i would think the populated area would get atleast as good of coverage. given any buildings in the way.

this is tower that is in the center of greenfield that is in progress on the map

How do you know its a good signal? You can use Sensorly app and go into details and when connected to LTE it will show you your LTE dbm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was running sensorly and using network signal info widged which is nice too for running all the time. I put up a few marks on sensorly while running a couple places last night

Network signal info widget doesn't give the correct signal strength for LTE

guheqe6e.jpgave3y6yj.jpg

 

The LTE engineering screen gives the correct information for LTE signal strength.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...