Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Northern & Southern Connecticut Markets (includes all cities)


shmget

Recommended Posts

Where are you seeing this information? On the state website, I didnt see any useful data, quite possibly, looking at the exact wrong link. I havent seen any work going on in East Windsor or Windsor Locks, and havent noticed anything in any of the towns various approval boards. Is it all controlled at the state level? I thought most towns had a role in the process as well.

 

I will say, sporadically my data speeds to go absolute crap in the area. That is a new issue, because for the last 3 years, my 3g speeds in the north of Windsor I91 corridor have been superb.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In there devolpment they need to add more towers buy my house and in general areas. Theres three towers in my area. One is lower sectoion of a valley that is were sprints is of course. One is at a high school on other side of valley on top of it. Last one is at town dump also up high. Where i live i fall in a dead spot and that airave thing is junk. But anyways i really hope they add new towers lte is not going to help dead spots. When att has full bars and verizon has 3. In my old town there where two towers one on highway side and other, on other side of the hill. Both have att and verizon the highway had sprint. So if you go on the other side your in a dead spot lol. I dont understand why verizon and att took off unlimted data. There have fiber optic cables with the local cable companys wich is a business account and get unlimted data because there a business. Then charge people for data thats a joke

Edited by z250kid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In there devolpment they need to add more towers buy my house and in general areas. Theres three towers in my area. One is lower sectoion of a valley that is were sprints is of course. One is at a high school on other side of valley on top of it. Last one is at town dump also up high. Where i live i fall in a dead spot and that airave thing is junk. But anyways i really hope they add new towers lte is not going to help dead spots. When att has full bars and verizon has 3. In my old town there where two towers one on highway side and other, on other side of the hill. Both have att and verizon the highway had sprint. So if you go on the other side your in a dead spot lol. I dont understand why verizon and att took off unlimted data. There have fiber optic cables with the local cable companys wich is a business account and get unlimted data because there a business. Then charge people for data thats a joke

 

Sprint won't be adding additional towers any time soon, unless they are already in the works. Sprint's main focus right now is Network Vision, once that is complete, they may consider adding additional towers.

 

Part of NV is adding 800 SMR to every towers. 800 SMR is usable further from the tower, and penetrates buildings a little better. Once 800 SMR goes live in your area, it will help tremendously with filling in the gaps between towers, and increasing coverage in fringe areas. It may not solve all issues, but it will certainly help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not sure what's going on right now in Windsor Locks, East Windsor and Enfield, but signal has been crappy, then great, and same with data. All abnormal. I know the East Granby site was done, but don't see anything for sites in surrounding towns. Anyone know? My phone didn't have working data on 3g at Bradley today until about 1130, and last few days it's been sporadic. Normally it's rock solid and fast.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 84 west right after exit 14 the tower closet to the highway had a crane last two days. They put new pannels on it today. I saw them as i drove by. I cant wait for these to go live. I know it needs fiber ran to the tower still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone mapped the 4g in Meriden at 691 X 91 interchange. Great to see that in Ct

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

If you drive south theres a brown building with pannels on them thats is sprints

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay my tower is not updated but its on the ct website to be. But another one in southbury ct. Has had new antennas on it just in the last two days. Still waiting for fiber i hope this is sprints. It is there tower and the top antennas were replaced. 214 Russian Village Road, 06488 Southbury, CT

Edited by z250kid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay my tower is not updated but its on the ct website to be. But another one in southbury ct. Has had new antennas on it just in the last two days. Still waiting for fiber i hope this is sprints. It is there tower and the top antennas were replaced. 214 Russian Village Road, 06488 Southbury, CT

 

The CT website doesn't show sites that are completed, but rather sites the State has approved to start work. They may still even require local approval before work can even start. It has taken months before a site shows up on the CT site and work actually begins.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CT website doesn't show sites that are completed, but rather sites the State has approved to start work. They may still even require local approval before work can even start. It has taken months before a site shows up on the CT site and work actually begins.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

I know that i was just wondering if it was sprint who had there antennas replaced. At this tower i went to drive to it but its a mile long dirt driveway thats blocked off

Edited by z250kid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tower in Windsor Locks (not Sheraton at Bradley) has had no working data for a week now. Have to get East of the 96 Prospect Hill Rd tower in East Windsor to get any data in Warehouse Point.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The CT website doesn't show sites that are completed, but rather sites the State has approved to start work. They may still even require local approval before work can even start. It has taken months before a site shows up on the CT site and work actually begins.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Can someone link this state site? Every state site I saw, is pretty useless with information, or at least discernible information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Can someone link this state site? Every state site I saw, is pretty useless with information, or at least discernible information.

 

I don't have the link. I've seen others post it in the past.

 

Robert via LG Optimus G using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

awesome. Thank you. So I assume, if nothing is listed for Sprint, then they haven't gotten the state level go ahead yet? I don't see too much Sprint on there that is recent. I don't even see some towers listed.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well that was lame.. back to 3g today. this is in new/fair haven zip 06513, near rt 80.

 

well here is a follow-up to this.. i had 4G with full signal at my house for a day, then the next day it was gone.. so i thought maybe they prematurely turned on a tower.. in fact there is 4G coverage just outside of my house near rt 80 in southern CT a few blocks away still, it doesn't make sense how i had 4G one day and gone the next at the same location (my house).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone noticed how fast the Northern market has been climbing up the percentage chart? We're already at 21% and ahead of the Southern market that started way before us. Hope this is a sign that I'll pick up a 4G signal on my Note 2 soon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
    • Looks like a great place for for FWA. Many apartment dwellers only have one overpriced choice.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...