Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Miami/West Palm Market


Mondays In Flames

Recommended Posts

I'm at the New Zaxby's on Okechobee Rd. in West Palm, and I had B26 at Palm Beach Lakes & Okeechobee!!!IT'S HAPPENING!!

Ive lived down there all my life and never knew there was a Zaxbys down there. Fail.

 

But yay for b26! Next time I visit I won't be stuck on b25!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Crapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive lived down there all my life and never knew there was a Zaxbys down there. Fail.

 

But yay for b26! Next time I visit I won't be stuck on b25!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Crapatalk

 

It just opened yesterday....It was slammed packed, we had to wait an hour for our food....:-/ But at any rate, the B26 still needs optimized, but it's coming!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fixed your post.

 

THANK YOU!!! I was on my phone and didn't want to wait to get the GIF...although, I should have it stored in my arsenal of Meme's...LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most are likely on low power mode. There is that chance that sprint is already so congetested there that the speeds are slow but its likely low power. I will happen quick. They had mist of Florida with band 26 within 4 months.

I wonder why the speeds are so slow.. But it should be much needed relief instead of dropping to 3g

 

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting B26 near Miramar Prkwy and i-75 (The NBC/Telemundo Building).   It's slow (.5 mbps with a 4 meg upload which is odd) but ill take it!

 

*Update* B26 is much more usable/stable than B25 down here.  I think B25 here was saturated for this cell tower.  It may not be fast but it's constant and I can stream music (which I couldn't do on B25.) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dumb question I know... But with 800 on now... It only connects to that one band, not 800 and 2.5 right?

 

Its been a while since i last focused on sprint stuff instead of school

It will connect to the best band possible at that location and given time.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk about Nokia showing up with their 8t8r, a record low ping Of 14 just WOW !! Anyone can feel free to to correct me if I'm wrong but I don't recap anything close to 14 being report in this forum.

It would be easier to identify with a signal check screenshot, but with a ping that low I can pretty much make a guess that its not clear b41. That's got to be 8t8r. I don't recall anyone posting a ping that low on this forum. I can't wait for that to be everywhere in Florida. That is actually faster than my home internet, and the ping is better too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be easier to identify with a signal check screenshot, but with a ping that low I can pretty much make a guess that its not clear b41. That's got to be 8t8r. I don't recall anyone posting a ping that low on this forum. I can't wait for that to be everywhere in Florida. That is actually faster than my home internet, and the ping is better too.

This is my home tower and believe me is Sprint, either way here is the screen shots from signal check.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/sc/2p7wwei8koh0uyj/AADE3Q2s-AUqIIYSB4vIPFcKa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...