Jump to content

Sprint & Tmobile


Recommended Posts

 

 

"It's really more a matter of the finances. Could Sprint work out a financing scheme to buy out Tmo from DK? Or would it have to be DK ponying up to buy up Sprint? That's for all the fancy MBAs and lawyers to figure out."

 

I agree.

In fact these guys are trying to make money 1st.

Then they shoehorn FCC, networks employees.

I still think there some very creative salesmen at the telecom companies staying up late at night figuring out how to get a bigger slice. It won't be anything standard. It will be something out of the main stream paradigm.

Sprint seems like it is leveraged to the max and then some. They have to catch their breath or sell an investor on the next big thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a compromise? Dan Hesse would remain the Sprint spokesman, but he would wear the pink dress.

 

AJ

 

NOOOOO!

 

How about a trade of Dan Hesse for Carly Foulkes instead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

NOOOOO!

 

How about a trade of Dan Hesse for Carly Foulkes instead?

 

Carly Foulkes is not worth Hesse, even if she looks great in magenta dresses and skin tight leather. If we lose hesse, we could end up replacing him with a Randall Stephenson clone. I would rather not take the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carly Foulkes is not worth Hesse, even if she looks great in magenta dresses and skin tight leather.

 

Alternatively, Carly could do some black & white Sprint commercials like Dan has done. See...

 

1305k645mid100415img_00066_lg.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If only there were plans for a nationwide cell network of any kind' date=' that'd be great.[/quote']

 

What are you talking about?

 

Sent from my Jelly Bean Toro using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alternatively, Carly could do some black & white Sprint commercials like Dan has done. See...

 

1305k645mid100415img_00066_lg.jpg

 

AJ

 

Dayuuummmn!

Usually I remove the media when quoting for the sake of space... not this time! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Dayuuummmn!

Usually I remove the media when quoting for the sake of space... not this time! ;)

 

This thread just made me consider the following... there are only guys on this board, huh? No female members? Interesting to see what interests different groups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem with that' date=' though somebody please get the lass a cheeseburger or three.[/quote']

 

My wife read this thread, and this was her favorite comment of all. She concurs. :)

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL nice! Though I would make it all one font ;)

 

Yeah, it is just a merge of the Sprint logo and the "mobile" part of the T-mobile logo, with the Sprint "pin drop" color changed to Magenta, and the name changed to dark grey, with the addition of the T-mobile squares. That way you could read it "Sprint Mobile" or "Sprin T-Mobile". Okay, had too much time on hands... like 10 min. :)

Edited by sprinturg4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...