Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Jacksonville Market (including Gainesville/St. Augustine/Ocala)


Syph3r

Recommended Posts

I never actually thought that whats it could be...I was just thinking its referring to Network vision entirely...Never considered it might just be referring to 800 CMDA/LTE

 

At this rate, I wouldn't bet any money on it referring to 800.  Probably just in regards to having NV equipment and 3G/LTE 1900 upgrades on each site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope to see band 26 soon in Jacksonville. I really only spend time on the Southside of Jacksonville, so overall I still have a spotty view of LTE in Jacksonville over St Augustine, Orlando, Daytona Beach and West Palm Beach. It will be nice to see a fuller coverage, especially on the highway. That is a weak point with Sprint from what I have seen. Sprint has great highway coverage, but the spacing makes for a constant low signal and spotty 4G for most of the time while traveling.

I have LTE almost everywhere I go. I live in the downtown area (San Marco) and am usually always in the Riverside, downtown, Springfield, San Marco areas of town. When I do leave this area, I'm frequently in Southside/Mandarin and The Beaches (Atlantic beach to Ponte Vedra), as well as St. Augustine and Orange Park and I very rarely ever drop LTE signal on my iPhone 5, which has very good RF characteristics.

 

The only LTE holdouts I see are Atlantic blvd between St. John's bluff and Kernan (not the best coverage due to some towers still on legacy), A1A from Ponte Vedra Beach south to north St. Augustine, extreme north end of The Town Centre (in-building penetration), certain stretches of Philips highway between racetrack road and just north of St. Auggy, downtown St. Augustine and Riverside's in-building penetration, which will be fixed once the last site finally gets upgraded (fine if outside most buildings).

 

When I was in Orlando a few weekends ago, I barely saw LTE and when I did it was slow, as was EVDO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was in Orlando a few weekends ago, I barely saw LTE and when I did it was slow, as was EVDO.

 

I had a completely opposite experience in Orlando.  Had a strong LTE signal everywhere I went, with the exception of inside some buildings downtown.  Was primarily on the east side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a completely opposite experience in Orlando. Had a strong LTE signal everywhere I went, with the exception of inside some buildings downtown. Was primarily on the easy side.

Most places in Orlando have decent LTE. I just had a friend who has att do a speed test against me where we both had LTE and 4 bars. I had like 8 down and she had barely 1. It was glorious

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a completely opposite experience in Orlando. Had a strong LTE signal everywhere I went, with the exception of inside some buildings downtown. Was primarily on the easy side.

That's strange. I've talked about this before in this thread. I'm not sure why I have a different experience. Who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T will be in trouble with regards to capacity soon. They're already slowing down a lot and there isn't much they can do to fix it, spectrum-wise. They will no longer be able to claim they have the fastest LTE network. Between the big three, AT&T has the least spectrum overhead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T will be in trouble with regards to capacity soon. They're already slowing down a lot and there isn't much they can do to fix it, spectrum-wise. They will no longer be able to claim they have the fastest LTE network. Between the big three, AT&T has the least spectrum overhead.

 

Yeah AT&T is in a weird position in regards to their spectrum.  They don't have enough continuous spectrum for large carriers if I remember correctly.  It's probably going to require an extensive refarm to get them where they want to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just imagine if a combined Sprint/T-Mobile didn't have to divest any spectrum. Sprint could very well be unstoppable.

And we'd be paying a lot more for service too. I don't approve of the merger.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just imagine if a combined Sprint/T-Mobile didn't have to divest any spectrum. Sprint could very well be unstoppable.

 

Will probably be okay for them to divest some of the AWS holdings.  Sprint/T-Mobile would have A LOT of PCS spectrum, which would serve them well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And we'd be paying a lot more for service too. I don't approve of the merger.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

I'm not for the merger either. But I don't think it will be all bad should it happen. It won't destroy competition. Tmo and Sprint together can grow into a true nationwide network. Individually, neither will likely expand coverage much more than they already have got

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just imagine if a combined Sprint/T-Mobile didn't have to divest any spectrum. Sprint could very well be unstoppable.

Sprint should be in amazing shape, even without Magenta, so long as they start executing properly.

 

BTW, I pulled a consistent 16-20mbps down and a steady 8mbps up at dinner in Riverside tonight, on B25. This was in the middle of Riverside on Saturday night, despite the last major site in riverside not having been upgraded yet.

 

Considering I use to struggle to even get an EVDO signal in this area and when I did it was abysmal, Sprint has come a long way. I didn't have my other devices with me, but I seriously doubt AT&T or VZW could come close to this in this densely populated area. This area is known to destroy network speeds.

 

The same holds true for San Marco and Downtown. My data speeds are always 6-25mbps and the low-end is usually in-building with signal over -110dbm. The two sites at I-95 on the east-side of the Fuller Warren bridge are my home sites, btw. San Marco and downtown have several sites with good spacing. I've been very impressed with the data speeds lately. It wasn't this good a few months ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys were definitely on to something when you all were saying that eHRPD wasn't connecting and devices were dropping back 3g and staying there. This has been going on for at least a week. Hopefully when this clear up we will see some type of 800 service. CDMA or LTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys were definitely on to something when you all were saying that eHRPD wasn't connecting and devices were dropping back 3g and staying there. This has been going on for at least a week. Hopefully when this clear up we will see some type of 800 service. CDMA or LTE

Yeah something interesting is going on. Its been a few weeks without an eHRPD sighting for me.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just came back from St. Augustine. My sprint service was terrible in downtown, still. I roamed anytime I walked into a building and was on 1x almost the entire time I was down there. The only times I saw EVDO, it was SLOW and I never once connected to LTE, until I was leaving the downtown area and heading towards US-1. This area needs CDMA800 and LTE badly and could possible use another site for capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site that serves downtown St Augustine is the only 3G only site on St Augustine and also happens to be really poor with 3G despite being NV upgraded. I am not sure what is going on with the site, it is terrible no matter the time of day or how close you are to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site that serves downtown St Augustine is the only 3G only site on St Augustine and also happens to be really poor with 3G despite being NV upgraded. I am not sure what is going on with the site, it is terrible no matter the time of day or how close you are to it.

Yeah, I've been keeping track on the sponsor maps. I've gotten terrible service for quite some time, in that area. It won't last for long, hopefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site that serves downtown St Augustine is the only 3G only site on St Augustine and also happens to be really poor with 3G despite being NV upgraded. I am not sure what is going on with the site, it is terrible no matter the time of day or how close you are to it.

Could not agree more, I always here about it from the Wife when we're there hanging out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to keep the wife from jumping ship. The black hole at our house and her work bugs her more than me. I can deal with waiting until I'm a 1/2 mile down the road before making a call off of the airave. Her work location having no signal is harder to deal with. I work downtown so I'm good for signal.

 

Trying to buy time for 800 to see if that fixes the 0 signal issues we deal with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else get the Sprint text about the network status?

 

SprintFreeMsg: Over the next month, the new network will be largely completed in your area.

Yes. It most likely 99% means nothing

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • My hope is they can spot something in the data that was exported. I am going after all 4 carriers on a multitude of phones and Android versions. My S24 did work.  I have not checked another S24 or S22.  S21s failed which are on Android 14 as well. It should be noted I did not reboot after updates and some of the data was captured on the prior update. Data from some new Boost Mobile Dish (Echostar) sites in the Wheeling area did make it in. Was hoping for more SA data from the duo. Many of the phones are just LTE.
    • I was traveling for a couple of days.   Sunday evening, I upload from 3 phones.  A S-22 and two Moto 5G phones.  Everything looked ok.    How do we explain that?   One person has issues and another person does not.  All my phones have the latest update.
    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...