Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

Of course they haven't updated it. There's no reason for them to.

 

At this point, not even extra T-1's are worth being listed on the network.sprint.com maps. I just wish that things would start progressing there soon. :td:

 

Oedipus, is your profile pic a cat with beaver-like teeth and eyes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some activity not the kind I expected. Any idea what they are putting up?

 

A microwave of some sort. Not sure who it's for though. I guess we will know for sure in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, not even extra T-1's are worth being listed on the network.sprint.com maps. I just wish that things would start progressing there soon. :td:

 

Oedipus, is your profile pic a cat with beaver-like teeth and eyes?

 

It's not a cat, but I forget what it is. It's some weird European woodland creature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are constantly working on a cell tower at the intersection of Fresno and "P" as I can see them from my office window.  Not sure what they are doing, but we still haven't gotten any better 3G.  I am just glad that I am able to get Wimax where I sit.

 

I was in Mendota today, how the heck do they get LTE while the big city gets nothing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are constantly working on a cell tower at the intersection of Fresno and "P" as I can see them from my office window.  Not sure what they are doing, but we still haven't gotten any better 3G.  I am just glad that I am able to get Wimax where I sit.

 

I was in Mendota today, how the heck do they get LTE while the big city gets nothing?

Current Device: Blazing Fast EVO 4G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They only have one tower

 

Yeah, I'm impressed that the signal reaches as far as downtown. It probably fades out pretty quickly once you start getting some buildings in the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are constantly working on a cell tower at the intersection of Fresno and "P" as I can see them from my office window.  Not sure what they are doing, but we still haven't gotten any better 3G.  I am just glad that I am able to get Wimax where I sit.

 

I was in Mendota today, how the heck do they get LTE while the big city gets nothing?

 

What floor are you on the you get wimax?

 

I never got wimax downtown at street level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only time we've gotten wimax was at courthouse park downtown. Worked well there but that's it. Surrounding vicinity... not so much (my wife has an EVO). Works well in LA and parts of the bar area though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, despite how bad the network is in Fresno, I was still able to use Apple Maps to get someone directions. And there were times that I wondered if I'd get any data, but in the end it was better than I expected. PS, I was at the fairgrounds all day.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only time we've gotten wimax was at courthouse park downtown. Worked well there but that's it. Surrounding vicinity... not so much (my wife has an EVO). Works well in LA and parts of the bar area though.

 

WiMAX in Visalia was always hit or miss for me. I hope they add some new towers when they start doing their broader band 41 deployment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What floor are you on the you get wimax?

 

I never got wimax downtown at street level.

 

I am on the 4th floor of the State building on the East side facing Fresno Street.  The connection is either 1 or 2 bars but always connected.  Where would this tower be?

Edited by ArcFlash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More specifically Blackstone and I think Mckinley.

 

That tower always gave me garbage range though. Like half mile on a good day with a GS2.

 

Thats why its so surprising you have it downtown, although sensorly shows other people got it to. 

 

 

Well, despite how bad the network is in Fresno, I was still able to use Apple Maps to get someone directions. And there were times that I wondered if I'd get any data, but in the end it was better than I expected. PS, I was at the fairgrounds all day.


Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

 



"was able to use data" is not a ringing endorsement...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, despite how bad the network is in Fresno, I was still able to use Apple Maps to get someone directions. And there were times that I wondered if I'd get any data, but in the end it was better than I expected. PS, I was at the fairgrounds all day.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

I must admit that the 3g at the fairgrounds is really good, I was totally able to use the phone last year when we went to the fair, both indoors and out and it was very crowded! Close to 2.0 mbs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must admit that the 3g at the fairgrounds is really good, I was totally able to use the phone last year when we went to the fair, both indoors and out and it was very crowded! Close to 2.0 mbs. 

 

Yeah, it's not that fast this year. However, if anyone from the Fresno areas wants to meet and hangout tomorrow at the fairgrounds, I will be back over there. Have an LCV S4GRU get together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...