Jump to content

Network Vision and Spark EARFCN logging thread


Recommended Posts

Revol-ting!  Revol-ting!

 

Yeah, I guess Ting, too, would get some of that second band 25 carrier.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also second PCS LTE carrier confirmed in Cleveland earfcn 26465/8645 (PCS F Block) and Columbus earfcn 26565 / 8565 PCS C block.

This is awesome. Tim, where did this spectrum come from? Was it refarmed Sprint spectrum? Or, was it through a regional acquisition.

 

Edit: AJ answered this as I was typing. Revol?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B41 in mid Michigan is on channel 58978. I don't see that listed on the OP. I've got a screenshot if needed.

 

Carefully read the top post, please.

 

egg-on-face.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have again updated the top post and spreadsheet.  They do not, however, include the reported second band 25 carriers in Revol spectrum yet.  Those await screenshot confirmation.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have again updated the top post and spreadsheet. They do not, however, include the reported second band 25 carriers in Revol spectrum yet. Those await screenshot confirmation.

 

AJ

uploadfromtaptalk1414803694540.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I was requested to post my B25 second carrier finds for the Cleveland market, so here's the screenshots. Both of these were found October 29thattachicon.gif Screenshot_2014-10-29-15-51-27.pngattachicon.gif Screenshot_2014-10-29-17-58-39.png

Cleveland is now running 3 5x5mhz band 25 carriers? That's nice.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was requested to post my B25 second carrier finds for the Cleveland market, so here's the screenshots. Both of these were found October 29thattachicon.gifScreenshot_2014-10-29-15-51-27.pngattachicon.gifScreenshot_2014-10-29-17-58-39.png

 

Were both of those screenshots taken in the Cleveland-Akron market?  The second appears to be an anomaly, as that LTE carrier is centered in the PCS E block, which is licensed to T-Mobile.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, both were taken in the Cleveland market, though in different regions. The 8415/26415 pair was grabbed from a site near Warren, OH. I'll reevaluate the result the next time I'm in that area and let you know if anything's different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, both were taken in the Cleveland market, though in different regions. The 8415/26415 pair was grabbed from a site near Warren, OH. I'll reevaluate the result the next time I'm in that area and let you know if anything's different.

 

Ah, that is not the Cleveland-Akron market.  It is the Youngstown-Warren market, where Sprint did acquire a different Revol license -- the PCS E block license.  So, your screenshot is accurate.

 

Apparently, Sprint is not screwing around with this Revol spectrum.  Youngstown is basically an armpit, a heavily depressed area that is losing population like crazy.  But, regardless of market prospects, Sprint is rolling this acquired spectrum right into band 25 LTE.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These were taken in and around Eaton Ohio in the Cincinnati market. There are three sites that always give me an invalid UL Channel. I took a screen shot so we know it is not software. Is this a site configuration error? Also the uploads either fail or they are extremely slow. dkyeager helped me figure out it was an invalid UL channel.18421d434ec0b772ea18144f4e858221.jpg38db66189bea6a745b6885593852602e.jpgc821ab31c4e742336e8f03b52228895a.jpg

Also found a second band 25 carrier but was unable to get a engineering screenshot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

New B41 sites coming online in the Metro Detroit area. I saw EARFCN 41374 coming from sites in the Madison Heights and Troy area. There was a B41 site that just came online in the Warren area but  I wasn't able to determine the EARFCN. Any other B41 site I've seen in outstate Michigan is on the common 40978 EARFCN thus far. 

 

Screenshot_2015-01-02-16-51-07.png

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Over 90 b25 second carrier sites have been found in the Cleveland Market so far. Maybe they can be moved up to the big league on the first page of this thread.  Columbus continues to have just one B25 second carrier site.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Top post has been updated.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Earfcn 26315 is pretty widespread throughout Ft Wayne and points south, Southern Illinois and St Louis.

That's Chicago's second PCS carrier, too.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Earfcn 26315 is pretty widespread throughout Ft Wayne and points south, Southern Illinois and St Louis. 

 

A few thoughts...

 

EARFCN 26315 is the uplink.  Focus on the downlink EARFCN, which would be EARFCN 8315.  Generally, logging either is fine.  But TD-LTE throws a wrench into the mix -- with invalid uplink EARFCNs.

 

The PCS B block spectrum acquired from USCC is in the Chicago MTA.  Parts of Northern Indiana, such as Ft. Wayne, and much of Southern Illinois are still in the Chicago MTA.  So, reports of a second carrier in those areas with the same EARFCN as in Chicago are not exactly new info.  Those areas are all part of the Chicago MTA.

 

Now, St. Louis is a whole new ballgame -- to the cheers of insufferable Cardinals fans.  The USCC spectrum acquired there is from the St. Louis MTA PCS A block license.  It is not the same spectrum as in the Chicago MTA, so it cannot contain the same EARFCN.  But Sprint itself has long held the PCS B block license for the St. Louis MTA.  Thus, a second band 25 carrier in St. Louis with the same EARFCN as in Chicago would have to come from Sprint's own spectrum.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few thoughts...

 

EARFCN 26315 is the uplink.  Focus on the downlink EARFCN, which would be EARFCN 8315.  Generally, logging either is fine.  But TD-LTE throws a wrench into the mix -- with invalid uplink EARFCNs.

 

The PCS B block spectrum acquired from USCC is in the Chicago MTA.  Parts of Northern Indiana, such as Ft. Wayne, and much of Southern Illinois are still in the Chicago MTA.  So, reports of a second carrier in those areas with the same EARFCN as in Chicago are not exactly new info.  Those areas are all part of the Chicago MTA.

 

I was simply replying to the post above mine that basically the 2nd LTE carrier is more widespread across this region than South Bend.

 

 

Now, St. Louis is a whole new ballgame -- to the cheers of insufferable Cardinals fans.  The USCC spectrum acquired there is from the St. Louis MTA PCS A block license.  It is not the same spectrum as in the Chicago MTA, so it cannot contain the same EARFCN.  But Sprint itself has long held the PCS B block license for the St. Louis MTA.  Thus, a second band 25 carrier in St. Louis with the same EARFCN as in Chicago would have to come from Sprint's own spectrum.

 

AJ

 

Let me see what I can do about a screen shot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...