Jump to content

COUNTDOWN!!! Nextel iDEN Shutdown


Recommended Posts

Here is my quip

"All your Nextel are belong to us"

See if anyone recognizes that line....

 

Aybabtu.png

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was quick, nice AJ.

 

Maybe a better variation would be "All your 800 MHz are belong to us."

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That was quick, nice AJ.

 

 

Maybe a better variation would be "All your 800 MHz are belong to us."

 

AJ

Ugh, that is better. Perfect actually, I wish I thought of that one. Hahaha.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one can say foy sure but in general 800 dies better inside and usally covers a bit further.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few of local towers in Granville, oh are 3g/800 nv accepted. I picked up 800 once.... Think they were testing it and shut off until after the iden shutdown?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what she said

 

Hey, if it is "outdoor penetration," it often has to be quick.

 

(See this thread:  http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4125-lte-coverage-more-like-a-road-line-not-a-blanket/)

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're removing most of them from its network: 68k towers to 39k towers. That's where much of the cost savings from NV is coming from: removing redundant towers. With Direct Connect on CDMA SMR 800 MHz, Sprint has no need for the Nextek towers. Also, Direct Connect will be available even while roaming on VZW albeit with possibly some additional latency in the call setup.

Also, you know they don't own any of those, right? They lease them.

I don't think Sprint outright owns any of its towers.

Someone else on forums said some of the Nextel lease agreements were really bad and that on many of the towers, Sprint was sole leasee. So, maybe once the site owner sees that they have an empty tower, they'll give Speint better lease rates and Sprint will come back to that tower.

 

I know most of the towers are leased as a rule, but I thought sprint still owned the old Qwest towers in Montana and the Dakotas, plus the odd ones here and there that they built themselves for some reason (maybe they there were no good options for leasing a tower in a particular area?). Did they sell those all off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sectime

IDEN rollin', rollin', rollin' down the river

IDergEN works better 

Tell um Charlie sent you

Edited by sectime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WiWavelength, on 30 Jun 2013 - 11:32 AM, said:snapback.png

 

enyce9, on 30 Jun 2013 - 11:30 AM, said:

 

That was quick, nice AJ.

 

Maybe a better variation would be "All your 800 MHz are belong to us."

 

AJ

 

Ugh, that is better. Perfect actually, I wish I thought of that one. Hahaha.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

Ugh, that is better. Perfect actually, I wish I thought of that one. Hahaha.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

All your base station are belong to us.

Your towers are on the way to destruction, make your time (division multiplex access).

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one can say foy sure but in general 800 dies better inside and usally covers a bit further.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

penetrates buildings better.  I can tell you That one tower buy my work I have a Verizon work phone.  Sprint an Verizon on same tower I keep loosing 4g and Verizon stays on it maybe 3 bars but not dropping it.  As for distance a little more not like miles more unless its a flat open valley maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

penetrates buildings better.  I can tell you That one tower buy my work I have a Verizon work phone.  Sprint an Verizon on same tower I keep loosing 4g...

 

You should not try to "penetrate" buildings.  They definitely are not "loose."

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think goes in with exactly what some of you were iDen phones were seeing where calls didn't work then later it was No Service on the display:

 

"The end of the network didn’t come with flip of a switch, but rather with the dispatch of software code, Sprint network chief Bob Azzi said Monday. Just after midnight local time in the U.S., an initial script was sent to stop calls from working on the network and then over a few hours another set of code turned off the actual radios at more than 20,000 remaining Nextel sites. That process rolled with the time zones every hour as the clock struck midnight."

 

Source:  http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/07/01/sprints-nextel-network-is-finally-no-more/

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think goes in with exactly what some of you were iDen phones were seeing where calls didn't work then later it was No Service on the display:

 

"The end of the network didn’t come with flip of a switch, but rather with the dispatch of software code, Sprint network chief Bob Azzi said Monday. Just after midnight local time in the U.S., an initial script was sent to stop calls from working on the network and then over a few hours another set of code turned off the actual radios at more than 20,000 remaining Nextel sites. That process rolled with the time zones every hour as the clock struck midnight."

 

Source:  http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/07/01/sprints-nextel-network-is-finally-no-more/

 

Interesting.  So this seems to imply that the radios were remotely shut off so that it would stop broadcasting the signal.  I know Sprint still needs to send folks out to turn off the power, remove T-1 backhaul and cabinets for the OPEX savings but if this means that CDMA 800 can be launched faster because the 800 MHz signal all over the US is no longer being broadcasted then this is good news.  I still think it will be a few weeks before we see a large acceptance of 800 CDMA sites but I am hope I am wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Luckily, that hasn't arisen in my area where I am, aside from having B14 (well, ALL of AT&T signal) not work at all in Coosa county, Alabama. I wish there was a service for first responders that would go to ANY available carrier, provider, etc..and in the absolute worst case scenario, would give us service. I've been on an ambulance, trying to find an address, and my driver actually had to pull over and we pulled out a map book and tried to find the road using the "old fashioned way".. and that takes valuable time away that sometimes may be vital to someone surviving. BUT, I will say that I've only seen that in Coosa county... both my Tmo and AT&T phones had zero service and I couldn't get GPS, and neither could my driver (VZW service). Maybe satellite will help with that in those times where that occurs.. but that's an extreme example.     Edit to add: Let me add some context to this.. Coosa county isn't regular coverage area for my job.. so it's not a regular thing that we are dispatched to Coosa county.. and actually, there's been a change and that county now has it's own ambulance service that operates.. so the only time we might receive a request is if it's a multiple casualty scenario, or it's a transfer going home from our contracted hospital.  The way that reads above, it may seem like we are just out without some sort of GPS gadget to direct us on where to go, but for the most part, we know our coverage area pretty well. Dispatch can also give us cross streets for reference inside our coverage area (and our home county). Coosa just isn't a regular area for my job to run in. 
    • "Priority" doesn't mean "exclusivity."  When emergency services don't need B14, AT&T can use it for everyone else.  The trade-off is that when it is needed for emergency services, they not only get all of B14, but they have also arranged for priority on the rest of the AT&T network as well.  Beats having spectrum sitting unused most of the time and then not having enough when disaster strikes, as it could be without a partnership with a wireless company like AT&T. - Trip
    • I've wondered if being on the first responder plan has the priority over other 'regular' lines in the same way firstnet does (or, supposed to do with B14...I've seen normal customers on AT&T hit B14 so it's not {specifically} for Firstnet only)...  
    • T-Mobile prices people pay are all over the map. The free lines are key, so take them if ever offered again.  Your priority level would be a key factor for your price.  Only T-Mobile would know the average prices people pay.  Samsung has been offering very good deals at time of new model introductions so I have gone that route for factory unlocked, which allows me to also have a Verizon priority MVNO for when T-Mobile signal fails or I manually override.
    • I also wanted to post a speed test result.. I only do these once in a while from my home area because we are gonna be the last to see changes, like load balancing.  Right now they are digging all over the place for fiber installs, so I'm not sure what the hold-up is on making the upload speed a little more in-line with download speeds, but here is the most recent from my area:   https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10133670525
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...