Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)


brendan4t

Recommended Posts

I was able to get a brief flicker of 4G at Hafners near the "flagpole" this morning by toggling between "CDMA Only" and "CDMA/LTE", but it stayed less than a second before falling over to 3G. Still, it was exciting to see a 4 show up in in the notification bar for the first time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got LTE here in Everett again today on Bartlett st off 99. My phone went into roaming and for a minute I had Verizon LTE.

 

Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk 2

 

Hate to burst your bubble, but the phone is incapable to connect to Verizon lte. Not sure why it showed up like that, but I would guess it was ehrpd.

 

Sent with AOSP JB Toro on Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hate to burst your bubble, but the phone is incapable to connect to Verizon lte. Not sure why it showed up like that, but I would guess it was ehrpd.

 

He's looking at a Netmonitor screen that is very misleading. One field on the app screen shows the data type as LTE because there is an LTE connection somewhere. The other fields show CDMA IDs that the phone happens to be connected to at the same time. And further, because of timing issues in the underlying Android API, we can't even be sure that the device is updating all those CDMA data elements concurrently to provide data for an app like Netmonitor to display. The SID, NID and BSID values are not even updated in sync with each other. This is documented as a known issue with the Android API.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been able to connect to Verizon eHRPD on 850 Cellular here locally on my GS3. Can't keep it long. It will dump me back to EVDO-A in approximately 20 seconds.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

He's looking at a Netmonitor screen that is very misleading. One field on the app screen shows the data type as LTE because there is an LTE connection somewhere. The other fields show CDMA IDs that the phone happens to be connected to at the same time. And further' date=' because of timing issues in the underlying Android API, we can't even be sure that the device is updating all those CDMA data elements concurrently to provide data for an app like Netmonitor to display. The SID, NID and BSID values are not even updated in sync with each other. This is documented as a known issue with the Android API.

 

Not sure what you're trying to prove. I stated that the phone is not capable of connecting to Verizon LTE.

 

Sent with AOSP JB Toro on Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what you're trying to prove. I stated that the phone is not capable of connecting to Verizon LTE.

 

Sent with AOSP JB Toro on Forum Runner

 

Yes. And you also said, "Not sure why it showed up like that, but I would guess it was ehrpd."

 

That's what I was responding to. I was explaining how LTE could show up on the Netmonitor screen while it also showed a CDMA connection to Verizon. It was all just a reporting anomaly. But Android and Netmonitor are capable of distinguishing between eHRPD and LTE. I believe that he had a Sprint LTE connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else feel like the string is just being dangled here? I also seem to be having a problem where my phone tries to jump to 4G in areas where they may be working on it, but instead it just has no data signal at all despite having 4-5 bars. This is nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else feel like the string is just being dangled here? I also seem to be having a problem where my phone tries to jump to 4G in areas where they may be working on it, but instead it just has no data signal at all despite having 4-5 bars. This is nonsense.

 

Take a deep breath. Sprint hasn't even officially announced Boston as an LTE city yet. Put your phone in CDMA-only mode if you don't want to get bounced around during testing. I'm just excited that we have been seeing steady signs of progress!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Take a deep breath. Sprint hasn't even officially announced Boston as an LTE city yet. Put your phone in CDMA-only mode if you don't want to get bounced around during testing. I'm just excited that we have been seeing steady signs of progress!

 

Well said.

 

Sort of strange someone would say that Sprint making steady progress deploying LTE in the Boston market is "nonsense".

 

bostonsprintguy: bars have nothing to do with your LTE connection anyway, they are completely meaningless when looking at LTE signal. Bars map to CDMA voice, not LTE. Considering how far along Sprint is in Boston, in a market they haven't even announced, things seem pretty good for us.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well said.

 

Sort of strange someone would say that Sprint making steady progress deploying LTE in the Boston market is "nonsense".

 

bostonsprintguy: bars have nothing to do with your LTE connection anyway' date=' they are completely meaningless when looking at LTE signal. Bars map to CDMA voice, not LTE. Considering how far along Sprint is in Boston, in a market they haven't even announced, things seem pretty good for us.[/quote']

 

Strange you say that about bars, cause my Viper bars sometimes displays for 3G and most of the time it displays 1x.

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped at Cote's Market in Lowell today to pick up some baked beans, and low and behold, I had a great LTE signal in the parking lot. 15Mbps down/12Mbps up. Looking at the maps when I got home, it looks like I was hitting the tower a couple of blocks away at Merrimack and Cabot. I can't wait for the big rollout!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped at Cote's Market in Lowell today to pick up some baked beans, and low and behold, I had a great LTE signal in the parking lot. 15Mbps down/12Mbps up. Looking at the maps when I got home, it looks like I was hitting the tower a couple of blocks away at Merrimack and Cabot. I can't wait for the big rollout!

 

Got another 4G signal in Everett, MA today (probably the tower was in Malden). Not as great speeds (6Mbps up/2Mbps down), but I was probably 1.5 miles from the tower. This is getting exciting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is about the arm pit of Massachusetts, western mass? What is the status with 4g lte around these parts? Anyone know a guesstimate?

 

Areas of West of Springfield, like in the Pittsfield area, are some of the last areas in the Boston market schedule to get Network Vision/LTE upgrades. However, some of the Springfield area sites have already been completed. But likely will not be live until closer to market launch.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually next to springfield in Chicopee. Do you happen to know when it's the"launch" for this part? I seen on the sprint site that some of the towers around here have gotten upgrades but I haven't seen any 4g pop up on my phone like in the Boston area. I was thinking that I would as I'm thinking sprint will like to test the sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually next to springfield in Chicopee. Do you happen to know when it's the"launch" for this part? I seen on the sprint site that some of the towers around here have gotten upgrades but I haven't seen any 4g pop up on my phone like in the Boston area. I was thinking that I would as I'm thinking sprint will like to test the sites.

 

The Sprint site, network.sprint.com, only tracks maintenance upgrades being performed by their Network Management firm. That work is not associated with Network Vision and LTE deployment. S4GRU.com is the only site to date that tracks Network Vision/LTE deployment on a site by site basis.

 

In our Sponsors section we have maps that show all the sites in the country that will receive NV/LTE, as well as maps that show all the sites that have been completed to date. For more information about how to become a sponsor, you can read this thread: http://s4gru.com/ind...come-a-sponsor/

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...