Jump to content

Galaxy Note Edge (SMN915P)


z250kid

Recommended Posts

Soooo, Apparently my local Corporate Sprint store here in NY will not have the Note Edge on hand to purchase tomorrow. Only way to buy it is via online or in stores for delivery at a later date. Damn it.

 

TS

That is the case with every store. They are available for Direct Ship only. Same with the Nexus 6.

 

Sent from my Sprint LG G3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called some stores and one of them said they will have them but to get there early.

 

You will still be in line behind Edward Furlong, Steven Tyler, and some green guy.

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's this or the Nexus 6, but the N6 lower nit screen performance is a slight deterrence for me. Who here is definitely buying this. rural agreement cat 6 device with great screen, and camera performance is as future proof as it gets. N6 and lollipop or this ehlp a brother make the rational choice. I know this cost more but I will only need to upgrade fora 64 bit CPU rather than have to upgrade for cat 6 future speeds this has it baked in. If this were 64 bit I would not even think about this. The Note 4 is omitted purely because it has no rural roaming or cat 6 feature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's this or the Nexus 6, but the N6 lower nit screen performance is a slight deterrence for me. Who here is definitely buying this. rural agreement cat 6 device with great screen, and camera performance is as future proof as it gets. N6 and lollipop or this ehlp a brother make the rational choice. I know this cost more but I will only need to upgrade fora 64 bit CPU rather than have to upgrade for cat 6 future speeds this has it baked in. If this were 64 bit I would not even think about this. The Note 4 is omitted purely because it has no rural roaming or cat 6 feature.

 

I am not sure where you got the idea that the Sprint variant Galaxy Note Edge supports CCA/RRPP LTE roaming bands.  It does not.  It is just a typical Sprint tri band handset.  In that regard, it is no different from the Sprint variant Galaxy Note 4.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure where you got the idea that the Sprint variant Galaxy Note Edge supports CCA/RRPP LTE roaming bands.  It does not.  It is just a typical Sprint tri band handset.  In that regard, it is no different from the Sprint variant Galaxy Note 4.

 

AJ

Nexus 6 it is then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's disappointing that uplink CA is not supported at all.

 

To my knowledge, not a single North American handset has ever supported uplink carrier aggregation -- not for DC-HSPA+, not for LTE.  Only downlink carriers may be aggregated.  And I do not see that changing soon.  Uplink carrier aggregation, since it would affect uplink transmission, would just be a big battery drain on handsets.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nexus 6 it is then.

 

To my knowledge, not a single North American handset has ever supported uplink carrier aggregation -- not for DC-HSPA+, not for LTE.  Only downlink carriers may be aggregated.  And I do not see that changing soon.  Uplink carrier aggregation, since it would affect uplink transmission, would just be a big battery drain on handsets.

 

AJ

 

 

I am not sure where you got the idea that the Sprint variant Galaxy Note Edge supports CCA/RRPP LTE roaming bands.  It does not.  It is just a typical Sprint tri band handset.  In that regard, it is no different from the Sprint variant Galaxy Note 4.

 

AJ

I was told this by some one but after reading this this morning I ordered a Nexus 6 that should arrive by Monday or Tuesday.

 

Thanks for your always knowledgeable response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to that store that told me they have them and it ended up being a lie. Luckily I had the day off otherwise i would be pissed that on any other work day I would drive there at lunch to end up with nothing but air and broken promises.

They took my info and said they will call me when it comes in but I'm not holding my breath. Fool me once...

 

I can't order it online since I'm placing it on easy pay and doing ein swaps on a few devices, so I'll just continue checking the stores.

 

TS out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fool me once...

Shame on you. Fool me twice...you can't get fooled again.

 

At least, that is what George W. Bush thinks they say in Texas and Tennessee.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my knowledge, not a single North American handset has ever supported uplink carrier aggregation -- not for DC-HSPA+, not for LTE. Only downlink carriers may be aggregated. And I do not see that changing soon. Uplink carrier aggregation, since it would affect uplink transmission, would just be a big battery drain on handsets.

Uplink CA is new to LTE-A (3GPP Rel 10+). Rel 10 specified 3 new UE categories- 6, 7, and 8. Rel 11 introduced two more- 9 & 10.

 

I'm not sure about Cat 8 (not that it really matters, since no mobile device is going to be supporting 8x8 MIMO anytime soon), but Cat 7 & 10 appear to support 2-way uplink CA as a prerequisite to reaching their theoretical upload spec of 102 Mbps.

 

After I wrote the post you've quoted, I did some digging, and it appears most if not all devices next year with a SD 808 or 810 should be Cat 7-ready:

 

Anandtech:

Both SoCs have a MDM9x35 derived LTE Category 6/7 modem. The SoCs feature essentially the same modem core as a 9x35 discrete modem, but with one exception: Qualcomm enabled support for 3 carrier aggregation LTE (up from 2). The discrete 9x35 modem implementation can aggregate up to two 20MHz LTE carriers in order to reach Cat 6 LTE's 300Mbps peak download rate. The 808/810, on the other hand, can combine up to three 20MHz LTE carriers (although you'll likely see 3x CA used with narrower channels, e.g. 20MHz + 5MHz + 5MHz or 20MHz + 10MHz + 10MHz).

 

Enabling 3x LTE CA requires two RF transceiver front ends: Qualcomm's WTR3925 and WTR3905. The WTR3925 is a single chip, 2x CA RF transceiver and you need the WTR3905 to add support for combining another carrier. Category 7 LTE is also supported by the hardware (100Mbps uplink), however due to operator readiness Qualcomm will be promoting the design primarily as category 6.

So thanks to a die shrink (28 to 20nm), Qualcomm has been able to move the Gobi 9x35 on-die, unlike the 805 package, where it is a separate part. If nothing else, this guarantees that a SD 808/810 device will support *at least* 2x20 downlink CA rather than being cheap and using an older Cat 4 modem (cough, cough, Galaxy Note 4).

 

While this updated Gobi 9x35 still only supports 2x20MHz downlink CA, there is now room for a second transceiver to aggregate one more 20MHz carrier. Since it is said that "the hardware supports Cat 7", and the standalone 9x35 modem (like the one in the Note Edge) does not, I believe it can be reasonably inferred that the additional transceiver- the WTR3905- adds support for another 20 MHz carrier for both the downlink *and* uplink, for a total of 3*20MHz down & 2*20MHz up. The WTR3905, while separate, is being shipped automatically alongside the new SoCs (at no extra cost), so an OEM is very unlikely to omit it, since it wouldn't lower their BOM.

 

So then it would come down to network support. Will Sprint enable aggregation in the uplink if devices support it? The new 8T8R radios, being Rel 10/11 certified, *should* support it.

 

Rel 12, due out soon, will add even more CA combinations, such as aggregating 2-3 *non-contiguous* uplink carriers (which the 8T8R radios may be able to support with a software update), B25 intra-band CA, and rudimentary FDD-TDD CA (e.g. B25+B41). I imagine those last two items are a long ways off, however, as they would likely require new PCS RRUs, since the current ones only support Rel 8 + some Rel 9 features via software patches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uplink CA is new to LTE-A (3GPP Rel 10+). Rel 10 specified 3 new UE categories- 6, 7, and 8. Rel 11 introduced two more- 9 & 10.

 

I'm not sure about Cat 8 (not that it really matters, since no mobile device is going to be supporting 8x8 MIMO anytime soon), but Cat 7 & 10 appear to support 2-way uplink CA as a prerequisite to reaching their theoretical upload spec of 102 Mbps.

 

After I wrote the post you've quoted, I did some digging, and it appears most if not all devices next year with a SD 808 or 810 should be Cat 7-ready:

 

 

So thanks to a die shrink (28 to 20nm), Qualcomm has been able to move the Gobi 9x35 on-die, unlike the 805 package, where it is a separate part. If nothing else, this guarantees that a SD 808/810 device will support *at least* 2x20 downlink CA rather than being cheap and using an older Cat 4 modem (cough, cough, Galaxy Note 4).

 

While this updated Gobi 9x35 still only supports 2x20MHz downlink CA, there is now room for a second transceiver to aggregate one more 20MHz carrier. Since it is said that "the hardware supports Cat 7", and the standalone 9x35 modem (like the one in the Note Edge) does not, I believe it can be reasonably inferred that the additional transceiver- the WTR3905- adds support for another 20 MHz carrier for both the downlink *and* uplink, for a total of 3*20MHz down & 2*20MHz up. The WTR3905, while separate, is being shipped automatically alongside the new SoCs (at no extra cost), so an OEM is very unlikely to omit it, since it wouldn't lower their BOM.

 

So then it would come down to network support. Will Sprint enable aggregation in the uplink if devices support it? The new 8T8R radios, being Rel 10/11 certified, *should* support it.

 

Rel 12, due out soon, will add even more CA combinations, such as aggregating 2-3 *non-contiguous* uplink carriers (which the 8T8R radios may be able to support with a software update), B25 intra-band CA, and rudimentary FDD-TDD CA (e.g. B25+B41). I imagine those last two items are a long ways off, however, as they would likely require new PCS RRUs, since the current ones only support Rel 8 + some Rel 9 features via software patches.

Remember the movie " A Fish Called Wanda"..a classic so after reading the above I have to ask

"what was the middle part"?   Man, this is deep stuff!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember the movie " A Fish Called Wanda"..a classic so after reading the above I have to ask

"what was the middle part"? Man, this is deep stuff!!!

One of my favorite movies of all time. "I looked at the clock... because I was saying to myself... It's five to seven, where could he be going with that sawed off shotgun?"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Wa wa wa wa wa wa anda!  SHhhhh! Don't tell anyone about the key...Wa wa wa    wa nda..."

 

Great, Robert glad to see someone out there loves the classics..Planes Trains & Automobiles is another

of my alltime favs along with Caddy Shack...dating myself here

 

Stay warm up there...remember the Sioux managed to survive those winters for eons until someone

killed off all the Buffalo...( mild political statement here..apologies to those offended)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stay warm up there...remember the Sioux managed to survive those winters for eons until someone

killed off all the Buffalo...

 

Robert ate them all for their wings.  The buffalo, not the Sioux.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I went to that store that told me they have them and it ended up being a lie. Luckily I had the day off otherwise i would be pissed that on any other work day I would drive there at lunch to end up with nothing but air and broken promises.

They took my info and said they will call me when it comes in but I'm not holding my breath. Fool me once...

 

I can't order it online since I'm placing it on easy pay and doing ein swaps on a few devices, so I'll just continue checking the stores.

 

TS out

If you used the same avatar here as in sprint id realized who i was talking to lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So thanks to a die shrink (28 to 20nm), Qualcomm has been able to move the Gobi 9x35 on-die, unlike the 805 package, where it is a separate part. If nothing else, this guarantees that a SD 808/810 device will support *at least* 2x20 downlink CA rather than being cheap and using an older Cat 4 modem (cough, cough, Galaxy Note 4).

 

While this updated Gobi 9x35 still only supports 2x20MHz downlink CA, there is now room for a second transceiver to aggregate one more 20MHz carrier. Since it is said that "the hardware supports Cat 7", and the standalone 9x35 modem (like the one in the Note Edge) does not, I believe it can be reasonably inferred that the additional transceiver- the WTR3905- adds support for another 20 MHz carrier for both the downlink *and* uplink, for a total of 3*20MHz down & 2*20MHz up. The WTR3905, while separate, is being shipped automatically alongside the new SoCs (at no extra cost), so an OEM is very unlikely to omit it, since it wouldn't lower their BOM.

 

 

Your comment made it sound like the 805 not having a modem was a die size limitation. The Snapdragon 800 and 801 have integrated modems already. The 808 / 810 getting an integrated modem isn't purely about die shrink - the 805 didn't have one for a couple reasons.

1. It was originally developed towards targeting tablets with high performance needs. An integrated modem part is wasted on such products as most tablets are sold without a modem.

2. Rather than die size, the die shrink means the 808/810 are built on the same die process as the 9x35 - both are 20nm parts and thus can be done in one single monolithic SOC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Throwed Roll Lambert's Cafe 
    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...