Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Missouri Market (includes St. Louis)


riddlebox

Recommended Posts

I believe that that is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints… At least that's what Google maps told me

It is right behind Frontenac's City Hall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been spoiled by the LTE progress the last few weeks.

 

Seems so quite now.

I'm scared to think of what happens if we have a really awful winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pulled these 2 while at 70 & Salisbury and going across the McKinley. I went through my other screen shots, one looks like it it John & McKissock, the other I hadn't seen before.

 

The other one is Brooklyn, IL. They are checked off on the map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Site acceptance reports from Thursday (9/26) and Friday (9/27):

 

 

 

nuff said

  • Missouri - 17 updates (16 LTE)
  • Oklahoma – 3 updates (LTE)

Not sure its a fair comparison any more considering most of Oklahoma is launched already......

 

Sent from my HTC ONE

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the 3950 bunkum rd site was broadcasting today, if so that was one quick turn around time from start to finish (less than a week).  I was getting lte at home(less than a mile south) and at the firestation (about 1 mile to the northeast) for the first time.   Sector ID that I got were: 150-north, 319-East, 488-South.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, btw driving home last night i saw a rope hanging from the I-270 and Old Alton Rd site. Will get a closer look at that one and New Poag and Old Alton on the way to church this evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, btw driving home last night i saw a rope hanging from the I-270 and Old Alton Rd site. Will get a closer look at that one and New Poag and Old Alton on the way to church this evening.

I noticed this morning that the I-270 and Old Alton Rd (Thorngate) site had a different look to the rack this morning.  Before the rack was just a single "level" now it looked like they had added another level to above the old rack. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • T-Mobile has saved its 28Mhz mmWave licenses by using the point to point method to do environment monitoring inside its cabinets. The attachment below shows the antennas used: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdmin.jsp;JSESSIONID_APPSEARCH=LxvbnJuvusmIklPhKy6gVK7f9uwylrZ8LiNf3BqIKlDp3_5GxoBr!300973589!225089709?applID=14787154#   Here are the sites for Franklin county OH: https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp?applType=search&fileKey=66518254&attachmentKey=21989782&attachmentInd=applAttach
    • Yep, there is a label on the side of the box but it doesn't provide any useful info that the city doesn't already provide (Crown Castle Solutions is the franchisee). You can see my graphical interpretation of the city's dataset here.
    • T-Mobile UScellular agreement links from SEC filings: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/821130/000110465924065665/tm2415626d2_8k.htm Look inside for main link. Credit mdav-dos1 on reddit
    • Totally agree.  In my county and surrounding counties, TM did not place n-41 on every site.  When I look at the sites in question, I probably would have not placed it there either.  I can find just a few with n-71 only and in most of those cases if you live there and know the probable usage of the residents, you would not do a full upgrade on those sites.  One site in particular is set up to force feed n-71 through a long tunnel on the Turnpike.  No stopping allowed in the tunnel. No stores, movie theaters, bathrooms, so n41 would be a waste.    n25 is not really needed either, so it is not there.  The tunnel is going through & under a mountain with more black bears than people.  TM was smart.  Get good coverage in the tunnel but do not waste many many thousands of dollars with extra unused spectrum. I also see sites with only n71 & n25.  Again this makes sense to me.  Depending on what county we are talking about, they moved much of their b25 from LTE to nr.  Some counties have more n25 than a neighboring county, but luckily, it is plenty everywhere.   When you are in a very rural area, n41 can run up the bills and then be barely used.  I am NOT finding sites that should have had n41 but TM failed to provide it.  They may have to come back later in a few years and upgrade the site to n41.  However, we just may eventually see the last little piece on Band 25 leave LTE and move to n25. I am not sure if the satellite to phone service is using band 25 G block as LTE or nr. We also can possibly have at least some AWS move from LTE to nr at some point.  Yes, everybody wants n41. it is not justified in some cases.  When I travel, I desire some decent service along the entire route but it does not have to be 1 or 2 gig download.   If I can get 50/5 on a speedtest with data that will flow and not stutter, I am very happy. Yes, they will swap out the USC gear.  TM needs to match their existing network. The USCC equipment did the job for years, but it is time to retire it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...