Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Shentel Market (Shenandoah Valley/Hagerstown/Harrisburg)


Boosted20V

Recommended Posts

Gets the "go ahead" for what? B41?

 

Sent from my Note 4.

I thought they were waiting to get approval to start turning it on or something like that, unless I was just confused, because I remember someone talking about them having the back-haul already in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my knowledge, they will begin installing the B41 antennas this year. Nobody on here has seen any yet though. Also, Lancaster is in the Philly market. York is Shentel. If I recall, I believe the dividing line is the Susquehanna River.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my knowledge, they will begin installing the B41 antennas this year. Nobody on here has seen any yet though. Also, Lancaster is in the Philly market. York is Shentel. If I recall, I believe the dividing line is the Susquehanna River.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

Yep that's true, once I pass the river, I hit b26 instantly for shentel market, I was just surprised to see b41 out here in lancaster, now obviously since I'm not a paying person on the forums, I'm not allowed to know the details, but I can do my own testing since I know where the towers are. But that's great news, I hope the rest of pa gets covered in b41, but I just hope it's optimized because it really got bad in baltimore or at least since the last time I went there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep that's true, once I pass the river, I hit b26 instantly for shentel market, I was just surprised to see b41 out here in lancaster, now obviously since I'm not a paying person on the forums, I'm not allowed to know the details, but I can do my own testing since I know where the towers are. But that's great news, I hope the rest of pa gets covered in b41, but I just hope it's optimized because it really got bad in baltimore or at least since the last time I went there

 Just for clarification, Shentel does extend east on the other side of the Susquehanna river but that is only up towards the Harrisburg area and not as far south as Columbia, PA.  Shentel's earning's call is this week so maybe you will find out more about their B41 deployment and maybe if they have already started deploying towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for clarification, Shentel does extend east on the other side of the Susquehanna river but that is only up towards the Harrisburg area and not as far south as Columbia, PA. Shentel's earning's call is this week so maybe you will find out more about their B41 deployment and maybe if they have already started deploying towers.

I was referring to the area around York and Lancaster when I mentioned the river. Thanks for the clarification though. Shentel's towers go to the beginning of I-78 in the greater Harrisburg area.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my knowledge, they will begin installing the B41 antennas this year. Nobody on here has seen any yet though. Also, Lancaster is in the Philly market. York is Shentel. If I recall, I believe the dividing line is the Susquehanna River.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

 

Lancaster is actually part of the Central PA market, not Philly Market. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's awesome A2CKilla! Where did you pick that up? Is that also in Lancaster?

Yea, it's the area I had I hard time connecting to again when I first spotted it, the whole hacc Lancaster campus is covered with b41 but then it drops as soon as you get a little bit away, which makes me feel like this is a small cell tower, I also work nearby the area so I usually keep testing as well, they've gotten b26 to shentel levels out here rarely do I drop to 3g outside of a small spot

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

News from the earnings call (I'll update as the call goes on and from the Q&A):

 

Network Statistics

·         538 Cell Sites

·         94% have a second LTE carrier at 800 MHz

·         120 sites have three carriers, including a second carrier at 1900 MHz

 

Traffic

·         77% of data traffic is on LTE, with 40% on 800 MHz

·         Data usage grew more than 2x in 2014

·         LTE traffic grew more than 3x in 2014

·         Average speeds of approximately 6 Mbps

·         Average customer uses over 3GB per month

 

Cross band load balancing is preventing some deployment of LTE and voice functionality.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Q&A section was extremely dissapointing, as the one analyst who really knows wireless networks did not join the call so the Q&A was not very insightful.  Here are the last few points of interest from the call:

 

  • Most customers aren’t taking the “Cut your rate plan in half” but taking other plans.
  • They are aware of customers wanting stronger LTE signal and service once they leave the Shentel footprint.  Cited the Rootmetrics results from Harrisburg showing strong network results and then poor results for other non-Shentel areas that are adjacent.

 

*** I think it would be awesome if we could get together a list of questions for next quarter's earnings call and join the Q&A portion, as Shentel is a "small" company and I don't think we would get shut out.  At a minimum they have been very receptive, in the past, to questions submitted outside of the earnings call.  ***  

 

I'm sure the more network savy members and visitors could contribute some insightful questions that I/(we) could submit.

 

Any takers?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

·         120 sites have three carriers, including a second carrier at 1900 MHz

 

Cross band load balancing is preventing some deployment of LTE and voice functionality.

Shentel surely did the right thing when adding the second 1900 LTE carrier at some of their sites.  It was needed. It is totally amazing at how the public will use the capacity if it is there.  You can even see the usage climbing and speeds slowing slightly on the sites with the second 1900 carrier.  B-41 will be arriving just in time. 

 

We need some explanation of the issue with load balancing preventing some deployment.  The only thing I see is that my Galaxy S-5's are not hanging onto band 26 as tightly as they did a month ago.  They seem to transfer to band 25 more easily than they once did.  Maybe the band 26 is getting more congested and the extra band 25 carrier at some spots looks better to any load balancing software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

*** I think it would be awesome if we could get together a list of questions for next quarter's earnings call and join the Q&A portion, as Shentel is a "small" company and I don't think we would get shut out. At a minimum they have been very receptive, in the past, to questions submitted outside of the earnings call. ***

 

I'm sure the more network savy members and visitors could contribute some insightful questions that I/(we) could submit.

 

Any takers?

Excellent idea. I'm on board.

 

I was disappointed there was no talk of B41. It should be imminent for Shentel now. It illustrates how important having the right question askers there is critical.

 

Thanks for your write up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just finished talking to a sprint rep that came into my store, he showed me the tower statistics, estimated completion time, what towers had b41 running, everything, man I wish I had the app he had, we have to get our hands on it, lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I

 

 

Excellent idea. I'm on board.

I was disappointed there was no talk of B41. It should be imminent for Shentel now. It illustrates how important having the right question askers there is critical.

Thanks for your write up.

It's disappointing when the analysts from FBR Capital Markets don't join the call because they are the only ones it seems that understand the technology deployment and strategy side to Shentel's operations and ask the "good" questions.  I feel like they would have pressed hard about B41 deployment status and plans, but neither one of the two (noted below) joined.  

 

I would be glad to coordinate a separate Q&A submission or chiming in on the next earning's call.  I just need the questions in advance and will try and consolidate them into something that Shentel might be interested in responding to.  I would say post your question out in the forum so we know what people are thinking and I can work on keeping a master listing.

 

David Dixon - FBR Capital Markets

Neil Macker - FBR Capital Markets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I

 

 

It's disappointing when the analysts from FBR Capital Markets don't join the call because they are the only ones it seems that understand the technology deployment and strategy side to Shentel's operations and ask the "good" questions.  I feel like they would have pressed hard about B41 deployment status and plans, but neither one of the two (noted below) joined.  

 

I would be glad to coordinate a separate Q&A submission or chiming in on the next earning's call.  I just need the questions in advance and will try and consolidate them into something that Shentel might be interested in responding to.  I would say post your question out in the forum so we know what people are thinking and I can work on keeping a master listing.

 

David Dixon - FBR Capital Markets

Neil Macker - FBR Capital Markets

 

I would suggest creating a new thread in the Sponsor section specifically for this and start culling Shentel related questions.  I appreciate your interest in putting this together.  Awesome.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A new thread has been created in the Sponsor section.  Please feel free to contribute, review submitted questions, and throw out ideas to make a really great listing over the next couple of weeks.  Spread the word to other members.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A new thread has been created in the Sponsor section.  Please feel free to contribute, review submitted questions, and throw out ideas to make a really great listing over the next couple of weeks.  Spread the word to other members.

well that's saddening :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shentel surely did the right thing when adding the second 1900 LTE carrier at some of their sites.  It was needed. It is totally amazing at how the public will use the capacity if it is there.  You can even see the usage climbing and speeds slowing slightly on the sites with the second 1900 carrier.  B-41 will be arriving just in time. 

 

We need some explanation of the issue with load balancing preventing some deployment.  The only thing I see is that my Galaxy S-5's are not hanging onto band 26 as tightly as they did a month ago.  They seem to transfer to band 25 more easily than they once did.  Maybe the band 26 is getting more congested and the extra band 25 carrier at some spots looks better to any load balancing software.

 

I have noticed something lately now that the towers are load balancing. The closest tower to my house had two PCS carriers live prior to B26 being lit up. Since B26 came online, I never see the second carrier anymore from that tower. I'm curious as to why I never see it anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have noticed something lately now that the towers are load balancing. The closest tower to my house had two PCS carriers live prior to B26 being lit up. Since B26 came online, I never see the second carrier anymore from that tower. I'm curious as to why I never see it anymore. 

I think, and this is just my observation, the phones tend to go back where they were after any kind of restart.  Toggling Airplane mode will sometimes place you on the other carrier, but it seems to be sort of rare to see that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have noticed something lately now that the towers are load balancing. The closest tower to my house had two PCS carriers live prior to B26 being lit up. Since B26 came online, I never see the second carrier anymore from that tower. I'm curious as to why I never see it anymore. 

 

Load balancing algorithms automatically shuffle connections between lte carriers so that performance on both are within a few perctange delta. 

 

You personally not seeing it doesn't mean others aren't on it. It just means that the network parameters have decided that you are better off staying on "this" carrier other than the other one. 

 

IIRC, the algorithms also allow them to prioritise certain carriers for offloading purposes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...