Jump to content

Make Spectrum Great Again - Group wants to put pressure on Dish


orangeblue

Recommended Posts

I understand the new LTE band but couldn't Sprint tweak their current RRUs and antennas to support the H block? It wouldn't be optimal but it would be a band aid fix until they are able to roll out new RRUs and antennas...

No.

 

A radio is a licenses transmitter which is designed explicitly to not be able to do out of band emissions. What it's designed to do is what it can do. No ifs or buts.

 

Antennas can be reused but are not optimal. Radios and carrier cards need to be replaced.

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

 

A radio is a licenses transmitter which is designed explicitly to not be able to do out of band emissions. What it's designed to do is what it can do. No ifs or buts.

 

Antennas can be reused but are not optimal. Radios and carrier cards need to be replaced.

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought there other point of network vision was to be able to plug anything into their network. Does anyone at Sprint know how to run a wireless carrier. Can they plug 600mhz into their base stations if they ever get any of that?

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought there other point of network vision was to be able to plug anything into their network. Does anyone at Sprint know how to run a wireless carrier. Can they plug 600mhz into their base stations if they ever get any of that?

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Yes, Network Vision made it easy to plug anything into their network. But that doesn't mean that the current equipment can use any frequency ever - you gotta buy new, compliant radio heads, network cards, and antennas and then pay contractors to install it.

 

If Sprint ever got 700MHz, AWS, CLR, WCS, CBRS, any frequency, they could install it through new network cards, radio heads, and antennas. They will just need to buy the equipment, pay contractors, and make sure there's room in the cabinet for new cards and that the cell site can physically handle the added weight of the new equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Network Vision made it easy to plug anything into their network. But that doesn't mean that the current equipment can use any frequency ever - you gotta buy new, compliant radio heads, network cards, and antennas and then pay contractors to install it.

 

If Sprint ever got 700MHz, AWS, CLR, WCS, CBRS, any frequency, they could install it through new network cards, radio heads, and antennas. They will just need to buy the equipment, pay contractors, and make sure there's room in the cabinet for new cards and that the cell site can physically handle the added weight of the new equipment.

True

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought there other point of network vision was to be able to plug anything into their network. Does anyone at Sprint know how to run a wireless carrier. Can they plug 600mhz into their base stations if they ever get any of that?

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

The point of the rip/replace upgrade of the network was to make every cell site expandable from a base station level. In theory any spectrum holder could come to Sprint and use the physical site to broadcast their spectrum. They would just need a card for the specific frequency, an antenna panel and a radio head to connect to said panel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dish auctioned its spectrum holdings, 'carriers would show up in size,' Jefferies analysts argue

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/if-dish-auctioned-its-spectrum-holdings-carriers-would-show-size-jefferies/2016-05-20

 

Honestly, I'm inclined to believe. Set a price on some and people will be hesitant. Let people fight for their price and then you get successful sales! Part of the reason eBay is so great; if Dish does this I think they'll definitely flip it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Dish auctioned its spectrum holdings, 'carriers would show up in size,' Jefferies analysts argue

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/if-dish-auctioned-its-spectrum-holdings-carriers-would-show-size-jefferies/2016-05-20

 

Honestly, I'm inclined to believe. Set a price on some and people will be hesitant. Let people fight for their price and then you get successful sales! Part of the reason eBay is so great; if Dish does this I think they'll definitely flip it

 

It will be a lot less than the AWS-3 prices.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be a lot less than the AWS-3 prices.

Still better than what it's valued at, which as this point in time makes it a gain on sale technically if they're applying Lower of Cost or Market on the asset.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still better than what it's valued at, which as this point in time makes it a gain on sale technically if they're applying Lower of Cost or Market on the asset.

Spectrum is not an asset like inventory.

 

Most telecoms record and recognize at historical cost. However with the new leasing standard effective for year end 2017 this will change.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...