Jump to content

Major coverage map update 2016/01/10


JWMaloney

Recommended Posts

My exact situation. I report to sprint zone twice per week and they don't do anything.

Ya same issue here. With all honestly we just have to wait until it gets to our markets at this point! That what i was told. It sucks

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My exact situation. I report to sprint zone twice per week and they don't do anything.

The problem is.... when you only have band 25 it has to do too much. It has to cover in buildings as much as it can.... it has to handle traffic...but even getting band 41 im already seeing it with band 25.....if you are not within a half of mile to the tower the signal strength sucks. So im assuming it will be worse until small cells come along

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is.... when you only have band 25 it has to do too much. It has to cover in buildings as much as it can.... it has to handle traffic...but even getting band 41 im already seeing it with band 25.....if you are not within a half of mile to the tower the signal strength sucks. So im assuming it will be worse until small cells come along

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

I thought you didn't have Band 41? Unless I'm reading that wrong you're saying B41 signal is bad unless you're close to the tower.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't.....im guessing that if i do get it.... since its a higher frequency it's harder to travel further. Since the 1900 mhz already has trouble to travel.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Nokia's (Nokia is the vendor for your market) 8T8R antennas help a lot with that. Thanks to the advanced antennas and with the help of beam forming, the usable reach of B41 is very close to that of B25, especially outdoors. Indoors will vary due to different construction materials, and many other variables.

 

Sent from my LG G4

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nokia's (Nokia is the vendor for your market) 8T8R antennas help a lot with that. Thanks to the advanced antennas and with the help of beam forming, the usable reach of B41 is very close to that of B25, especially outdoors. Indoors will vary due to different construction materials, and many other variables.

 

Sent from my LG G4

I see. I did read about that in my research just making sure it's valid. Can these antennas be put on towers that are shared? Mine is shared with at&t.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see. I did read about that in my research just making sure it's valid. Can these antennas be put on towers that are shared? Mine is shared with at&t.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Yes...? AT&T has multiple antennas do they not? So unless there's some sort of engineering issue like a weight limit, most of your typical freestanding monopole/lattice towers have multiple tiers, each for a different carrier with their own mix on antennas.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes...? AT&T has multiple antennas do they not? So unless there's some sort of engineering issue like a weight limit, most of your typical freestanding monopole/lattice towers have multiple tiers, each for a different carrier with their own mix on antennas.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Cool. Thanks for the info. Guess ill just have to wait until sprint decides to bring this here.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Total tech dude is hit or miss. Very inconsistent with his news. I will believe it when I see it. I hope Verizon does bring back unlimited though.

It would only make sense. Especially since at&t is starting to offer it. I know there is a catch to it, but there are a lot of direct tv customers out there.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't.....im guessing that if i do get it.... since its a higher frequency it's harder to travel further. Since the 1900 mhz already has trouble to travel.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Nokia's (Nokia is the vendor for your market) 8T8R antennas help a lot with that. Thanks to the advanced antennas and with the help of beam forming, the usable reach of B41 is very close to that of B25, especially outdoors. Indoors will vary due to different construction materials, and many other variables.

 

Sent from my LG G4

 

I can say what David said is 100 percent true. Depending on which tower I'm connected to (from what I've seen) is anywhere from a -2 to -10 (on average) difference in radio frequency. Where B25 is at -88, I see B41 sit at about -92 to about -95 on one tower. On another where B25 sits at about -100, B41 sits at -108. Both of these are full builds (B25, B26 and B41) and have a second B41 carrier and IMO are fully optimized sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can say what David said is 100 percent true. Depending on which tower I'm connected to (from what I've seen) is anywhere from a -2 to -10 (on average) difference in radio frequency. Where B25 is at -88, I see B41 sit at about -92 to about -95 on one tower. On another where B25 sits at about -100, B41 sits at -108. Both of these are full builds (B25, B26 and B41) and have a second B41 carrier and IMO are fully optimized sites.

Nice.... just waiting to get it is frustrating.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice.... just waiting to get it is frustrating.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

I feel ya, I'm very grateful my home towers have at least B25/B26 on. But go a couple mile any direction and you hit 3G only towers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel ya, I'm very grateful my home towers have at least B25/B26 on. But go a couple mile any direction and you hit 3G only towers.

So since the max speed of band 25 is 37 mbps. Does band 26 give you some relief to where u see about 10 to 15 mbps on band 25?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So since the max speed of band 25 is 37 mbps. Does band 26 give you some relief to where u see about 10 to 15 mbps on band 25?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

Oh easily! Now while the one tower I'm using as an example (B25/B26 only) is surrounded by full build towers with second carriers I know it makes this tower a bit faster than if you had multiple towers all at B25/B26 only.

 

On B25 I can usually pull 15-20 Mbps at normal hours and at least 8-10 Mbps on B26. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh easily! Now while the one tower I'm using as an example (B25/B26 only) is surrounded by full build towers with second carriers I know it makes this tower a bit faster than if you had multiple towers all at B25/B26 only.

 

On B25 I can usually pull 15-20 Mbps at normal hours and at least 8-10 Mbps on B26.

That is great!

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Things could be much worse. We are dead smack in the middle of DFW and lost 2 of our B41 towers in December, currently only have 1 left in range and it drops off line more than 20% of the time. I hear Sprint is moving towers and equipment around, but this is getting crazy. We (our daughter) switched to Sprint in November...from Clear, things have been going down hill quickly. If things progress at the current rate, we'll just drop them and start using the public library. Kind of sad in this age, especially in the middle of a city. Sorry for ranting, just be happy your still able to get a signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things could be much worse. We are dead smack in the middle of DFW and lost 2 of our B41 towers in December, currently only have 1 left in range and it drops off line more than 20% of the time. I hear Sprint is moving towers and equipment around, but this is getting crazy. We (our daughter) switched to Sprint in November...from Clear, things have been going down hill quickly. If things progress at the current rate, we'll just drop them and start using the public library. Kind of sad in this age, especially in the middle of a city. Sorry for ranting, just be happy your still able to get a signal.

 

May I ask how you know for a fact that you lost 2 of your towers?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things could be much worse. We are dead smack in the middle of DFW and lost 2 of our B41 towers in December, currently only have 1 left in range and it drops off line more than 20% of the time. I hear Sprint is moving towers and equipment around, but this is getting crazy. We (our daughter) switched to Sprint in November...from Clear, things have been going down hill quickly. If things progress at the current rate, we'll just drop them and start using the public library. Kind of sad in this age, especially in the middle of a city. Sorry for ranting, just be happy your still able to get a signal.

How did you lose towers? Haven't heard of this.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, Let me reword a little. We lost the signal from 2 towers we were using. I suspect the equipment or "site" was moved to another location. I'm sure the tower itself is still there. We did find another "site" that is currently transmitting on the west side of the airport, at least sometimes.  The 2 "sites" we lost were located on a hotel or building in downtown FW and the other was on the north side of Dallas. Oh yea, I say lost because they aren't transmitting anymore, at least not on B41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That also may be to combat the Mexican operators. They are notorious for spilling signal over the border, potentially trying to grab roaming traffic. A border town is a less than ideal place to be for wireless, unfortunately.

 

AJ

Driving East of El Paso, I-10 parallels the U.S.-Mexico border for a good 50 miles. There is (or was as of 2012) a good stretch of that highway in which At&t phones would roam on Mexican operator Telcel for about 5 miles. My friend accidentally sent 3 messages on that stretch of highway without him noticing the Telcel indicator on his iPhone.

 

But the same holds true for At&t. Back in 2007, I was driving south of Nuevo Laredo, MX towards Monterrey and as soon as I left the city, At&t was covering MX Highway 85 all the way to the Tamaulipas-Nuevo Leon state line. That's a pretty good long stretch of highway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Dish network down since 3:31am Signalcheck Pro reports the Dish Network, at least the site at Scioto-Darby Rd Near I-270  in Columbus Ohio, was last operational at 3:31am. I normally pickup signal from two other Dish sites as well.  Reported via downdetector.com as Boost Infinite but one is such a lonely number. Tried to manually reconnect to Dish, but network is not appearing. Hopefully scheduled maintenance.
    • Probably a lot of Midwest towers. Slight bias since Nebraska is a weird market, but there are tons of USCC sites that T-Mobile isn't yet co-located on. Think a similar situation in Iowa, Wisconsin, and Missouri. But some other markets, like yours, probably don't have that issue!
    • Sticky Customers - YES, and leave them flip to the T-Mobile PLMN when needed and they will be even more likely to Stick.
    • It seems to me that if the goal is to improve rural, the US Cellular buy-out would get them only part of the way there, considering there are plenty of rural areas that US Cellular does not serve.  But I also have a hard time reading it the way I think that article is, that the cost of this deal comes straight out of the $9 billion.  I mean, they're getting spectrum for their existing operations in US Cellular markets, including places that I wouldn't call rural.  (Roanoke, VA is the 9th largest city in the state, for example.)  It seems like some of it should be allocated to rural expansion, but certainly not the whole purchase price. There's also something to be said for getting the customer base of potentially sticky customers who have been used to US Cellular being the only game in town for potentially decades. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...