Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 5 User Thread


COZisBack

Recommended Posts

Has anyone noticed not being connected to 800 voice since last update or could be one from before?

I dont know about that but that last update definitely made the note 5s amazing band 26 a lot weaker. Hopefully 7.0 comes with another better radio update.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone noticed not being connected to 800 voice since last update or could be one from before?

Still connecting to 1x800 for voice here.

I dont know about that but that last update definitely made the note 5s amazing band 26 a lot weaker.

And no change in band 26 reception for me either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still connecting to 1x800 for voice here.

And no change in band 26 reception for me either.

If your in a market where band 41 is on at least some towers you might not notice but trust me when i say it is weaker.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh and i don't connect to Band 26 as much either. Band 25 allot.

That is more proper network management than anything. If a device is capable of getting a Band 25 signal (especially in markets with multiple carriers) it is better to keep that traffic off of Band 26 and reserve that for people in buildings or at the edge of the cell where it is either band 26 or no lte.

If your in a market where band 41 is on at least some towers you might not notice but trust me when i say it is weaker.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

I only get Band 26 at home and my phone is getting the exact same signal levels as it was prior to the previous updates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like the once very good Note 5 is now meh network performance wise to consider a used one?  My Note 4 is failing even with factory reset/ODIN so it apparently is time to move on unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like the once very good Note 5 is now meh network performance wise to consider a used one? My Note 4 is failing even with factory reset/ODIN so it apparently is time to move on unfortunately.

Mine is still great, besides the occasional sim issue and my now shit battery which doesn't last for shit anymore. I'm looking at the S8 next month, if I don't like it I'll be moving onto an S7 Edge.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine is still great, besides the occasional sim issue and my now shit battery which doesn't last for shit anymore. I'm looking at the S8 next month, if I don't like it I'll be moving onto an S7 Edge.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

Yeah that is something that concerns me about buying a phone with a non-replaceable battery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that is something that concerns me about buying a phone with a non-replaceable battery.

Yeah this thing just suddenly took a massive shit, and I always take proper care of my batteries. Sad I still love this phone, but I think it's time to move on.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine is still great, besides the occasional sim issue and my now shit battery which doesn't last for shit anymore. I'm looking at the S8 next month, if I don't like it I'll be moving onto an S7 Edge.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

I would not dare get a non hpue device if I was staying on Sprint. S7 anything is off the table whether its cheaper to buy or not. Performance over savings anyday.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not dare get a non hpue device if I was staying on Sprint. S7 anything is off the table whether its cheaper to buy or not. Performance over savings anyday.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Yeah I just remembered that lol.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, my battery has been pretty bad, but not terrible.  The more concerning thing for me is that my USB port is a little finicky.  Which isn't a big deal as I wireless charge a lot of places, but I'll be traveling quite a bit the next two weeks and corded top ups on my portable QC battery require a cord.  Oh well.  They replaced my wife's port and destroyed her screen = free refurb, but I don't want to go through that hassle.  I'm patiently waiting for the S8 jesus phone and praying it doesn't explode. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, my battery has been pretty bad, but not terrible. The more concerning thing for me is that my USB port is a little finicky. Which isn't a big deal as I wireless charge a lot of places, but I'll be traveling quite a bit the next two weeks and corded top ups on my portable QC battery require a cord. Oh well. They replaced my wife's port and destroyed her screen = free refurb, but I don't want to go through that hassle. I'm patiently waiting for the S8 jesus phone and praying it doesn't explode. :)

Yeah my USB port port is a little weird too, but I'll have a new phone soon.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about it now it will be no interesting to see how much hpue helps with signal, the best I get in my house on B41 is around 94dBm, will the S8 get low 80's? Should be interesting considering I hardly ever see B25, my other question is will clearwire sites support hpue? If not probably won't be a change is dBm.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about it now it will be no interesting to see how much hpue helps with signal, the best I get in my house on B41 is around 94dBm, will the S8 get low 80's? Should be interesting considering I hardly ever see B25, my other question is will clearwire sites support hpue? If not probably won't be a change is dBm.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

All band 41 sites will support HPUE as its really has nothing to do with the tower. Band 41 signal should look similar to band 25.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All band 41 sites will support HPUE as its really has nothing to do with the tower. Band 41 signal should look similar to band 25.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

I have no idea what a B25 signal looks like at this point lol.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea what a B25 signal looks like at this point lol.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Some of us wish we had that "problem." B41 is starting to fill in here in the more populated areas (in the cities and towns), but it's not ubiquitous as it is in other places. It would be nice to have it everywhere, but I know Shentel is being smart with their money and only putting it where they believe it's needed. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but it would be nice to have B41 on all towers.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of us wish we had that "problem." B41 is starting to fill in here in the more populated areas (in the cities and towns), but it's not ubiquitous as it is in other places. It would be nice to have it everywhere, but I know Shentel is being smart with their money and only putting it where they believe it's needed. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but it would be nice to have B41 on all towers.

B41 is nice, but there are a lot of times when I am stuck on a basically useless signal when I should kick down to B26, but seeing as B26 is really unoptimized here B41 quickly becomes useless. Won't even kick down to B25. Which​ is marginally better than B41 at least in my area.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of us wish we had that "problem." B41 is starting to fill in here in the more populated areas (in the cities and towns), but it's not ubiquitous as it is in other places. It would be nice to have it everywhere, but I know Shentel is being smart with their money and only putting it where they believe it's needed. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but it would be nice to have B41 on all towers.

At this point on the LTE game if its only 5x5 b25/26. Band 41 or at least 10x10 25 is needed period unless you live in the middle of nowhere.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point on the LTE game if its only 5x5 b25/26. Band 41 or at least 10x10 25 is needed period unless you live in the middle of nowhere.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

There are some areas near me you would probably consider the middle of nowhere. 5x5 B25 and B26 is all they have on some of the rural towers here, and they run faster than some towers in the towns and cities with 40 Mhz B41, 10x10 B25, 5x5 B25, and B26.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point on the LTE game if its only 5x5 b25/26. Band 41 or at least 10x10 25 is needed period unless you live in the middle of nowhere.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

I agree even a single carrier of B41 is so much better, you're almost guaranteed at least 10+Mbps, even on a low signal.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...