Jump to content

What is verizon doing with 800MHz? (fcc website)


stuckinohio1

Recommended Posts

Well i was on the FCC website reading about the Comcast time warner stuff and noticed there is a spectrum map or something. 

 

So i started clicking around and found the county i live in and its showing 50 licenses for something or another. i dont know if they are recent purchases or what but it shows verizon doing something with 824MHz to 891.5

 

Now this is the first time i have ever used this website so i might be confused but i though that sprint owned a small sliver of 800MHz (for 1x and LTE) and the rest was all reserved for emergency stuff.

 

 

here is a link directly

 

http://reboot.fcc.gov/spectrumdashboard/detailLicense.seam?conversationId=35632

 

If i am not understanding this information correctly please feel free to explain what exactly this is.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the Cellular band. Verizon has either block A or block B in most of the country, and it supports their 1x and EV-DO network.

ahhh ok. yeah expanding on it, it lists the block as A.

 

I thought both LTE and there EVDO/1x was on 700MHz so its only their 4G LTE that is on 700? and then XLTE on 1800 or whatever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ahhh ok. yeah expanding on it, it lists the block as A.

 

I thought both LTE and there EVDO/1x was on 700MHz so its only their 4G LTE that is on 700? and then XLTE on 1800 or whatever?

 

 

Only LTE is on 700MHz and XLTE on AWS (1800/2100MHz). They use Cellular (800MHz) and PCS (1900MHz) for 1x and EV-DO.

Pretty sure I read somewhere that VZ is in the early testing phases of LTE on CLR 850, but it probably won't happen for awhile. It takes a long time to refarm such valuable spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure I read somewhere that VZ is in the early testing phases of LTE on CLR 850, but it probably won't happen for awhile. It takes a long time to refarm such valuable spectrum.

While most carriers built out their inital LTE builds on newly purchased/acquired spectrum (700Mhz, AWS, PCS G) eventually they will all end up transitioning most of the spectrum currently providing 2G/3G services to providing additional LTE capacity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure I read somewhere that VZ is in the early testing phases of LTE on CLR 850, but it probably won't happen for awhile. It takes a long time to refarm such valuable spectrum.

It seems more likely that they (along with AT&T) will refarm PCS first. 700 Mhz already gives them the coverage they need (although they'll argue differently come the 600 MHz auction). For VZW, it's all about providing capacity to bring speeds back up to snuff. All of their legacy handsets (and Sprint 's) support CLR 850 for 2G/3G, so eliminating CDMA/GSM on PCS would likely only impact some M2M. It would also avoid reducing 2G/3G coverage during the transition to all-(Vo)LTE. Obviously their plans would have to differ a bit in the few markets where they don't have either CLR license.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, it appears that VZW has already begun reframing their PCS spectrum to LTE in the Cleveland market. This was taken from a VZW iPhone 6 in the Eastern Cleveland market a couple weeks ago:

44551a74bbbcb82702cf2f2fdd0516cc.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, it appears that VZW has already begun reframing their PCS spectrum to LTE in the Cleveland market. This was taken from a VZW iPhone 6 in the Eastern Cleveland market a couple weeks ago:

44551a74bbbcb82702cf2f2fdd0516cc.jpg

Wow. VZW using just 5MHz channels in PCS? Surprising.

 

Using Sharp AQUOS Crystal on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. VZW using just 5MHz channels in PCS? Surprising.

 

Using Sharp AQUOS Crystal on Tapatalk

Could be a samsung Pico cell. Their Samsung Pico cells are pcs Lte only.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be a samsung Pico cell. Their Samsung Pico cells are pcs Lte only.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Verizon is using Samsung as a vendor?  And Verizon would use pico cells only on a LTE band that only a very small amount of their devices currently support?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon is using Samsung as a vendor? And Verizon would use pico cells only on a LTE band that only a very small amount of their devices currently support?

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=441669&fcc_id=A3LSLS-BP00AK

 

http://www.lightreading.com/mobile/small-cells/samsung-snags-verizon-4g-small-cell-indoor-deal/d/d-id/708029

 

Verizon small cells are everywhere.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Even though that specific item is for Band 2 only, I cannot imagine Verizon using Band 2 only in its LTE pico cell deployment.  They either have another Samsung pico cell that has passed the FCC or that will be submitted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though that specific item is for Band 2 only, I cannot imagine Verizon using Band 2 only in its LTE pico cell deployment. They either have another Samsung pico cell that has passed the FCC or that will be submitted.

I believe their existing Ericson pico cell is pcs Lte only as well but they undoubtedly have more models. They have 750 mhz and aws small cells too.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I believe their existing Ericson pico cell is pcs Lte only as well but they undoubtedly have more models. They have 750 mhz and aws small cells too.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

These small cells are popping up like mushrooms in columbus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Wow. VZW using just 5MHz channels in PCS? Surprising.

 

Using Sharp AQUOS Crystal on Tapatalk

All 4 US carriers 1900 PCS is 5mhz. vzw's sprint's at&t's and Tmobile"S are all 5mhz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only LTE is on 700MHz and XLTE on AWS (1800/2100MHz). They use Cellular (800MHz) and PCS (1900MHz) for 1x and EV-DO.

verzion is planning LTE on there 1900 pcs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have been thinking about this for a while now. if you take away B41 (2500MHz) from sprint they actually have like no spectrum what so ever. if they could only deploy 5x5 on B26 and 25 they effectively have less spectrum than T-Mo.

 

I know they license some 2500MHz from schools and such so lets hope they dont get any ideas to take the spectrum from sprint and try to sell if for a profit. considering a 20 or 40MHz Block of spectrum would get them a boat load of money.

 

On the other hand i have no idea why verizon is even deploying LTE in 1900MHz as a 5x5 carrier. they have so many customers that their 700MHz 10x10 is slower than sprint in alot of places so whats the point of a 5x5 carrier. all they would do is give their subs slower speeds and miff em real good.

 

They would be better off selling that small sliver of spectrum since T-mo/spint/AT&T/ would probably be highly interested in adding it to their own holdings for wider channels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have been thinking about this for a while now. if you take away B41 (2500MHz) from sprint they actually have like no spectrum what so ever. if they could only deploy 5x5 on B26 and 25 they effectively have less spectrum than T-Mo.

 

I know they license some 2500MHz from schools and such so lets hope they dont get any ideas to take the spectrum from sprint and try to sell if for a profit. considering a 20 or 40MHz Block of spectrum would get them a boat load of money.

 

On the other hand i have no idea why verizon is even deploying LTE in 1900MHz as a 5x5 carrier. they have so many customers that their 700MHz 10x10 is slower than sprint in alot of places so whats the point of a 5x5 carrier. all they would do is give their subs slower speeds and miff em real good.

 

They would be better off selling that small sliver of spectrum since T-mo/spint/AT&T/ would probably be highly interested in adding it to their own holdings for wider channels.

First, you have to include Sprint's PCS holdings that currently are being used for CDMA instead of LTE, which alone can be more than 35 MHz in some markets.

 

Next, the benefit of Verizon running a 5x5 in PCS means that Verizon goes from having the capacity of a 10x10 network to having the capacity of a 15x15 network when in range of the PCS carrier. Which, in turn, will increase speeds on the 700 MHz network.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, you have to include Sprint's PCS holdings that currently are being used for CDMA instead of LTE, which alone can be more than 35 MHz in some markets.

 

Next, the benefit of Verizon running a 5x5 in PCS means that Verizon goes from having the capacity of a 10x10 network to having the capacity of a 15x15 network when in range of the PCS carrier. Which, in turn, will increase speeds on the 700 MHz network.

 

-Anthony

But that would involve carrier aggregation which Verizon hasn't really starting to build out for. Only 2 current US carriers can do LTEAdvanced, AT&T and Sprint. T-Mobile and Verizon for right now are still on FDD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that would involve carrier aggregation which Verizon hasn't really starting to build out for. Only 2 current US carriers can do LTEAdvanced, AT&T and Sprint. T-Mobile and Verizon for right now are still on FDD.

The CAPACITY of a 15x15, not the throughput of a 15x15. It's the same thing as Sprint launching a second 5x5 carrier in PCS.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you are talking about 2 different frequency bands. 700 and 800.

 

I think you are misunderstanding. Right now, Sprint doesn't have any carrier aggregation in place (as far as we all know). Sprint is currently running a 5x5 in PCS and a 5x5 in SMR in most places which effectively gives them the capacity of a 10x10. Speeds on the other hand are at 5x5 levels.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...