Jump to content

Apple event Oct 16th, new iPads likely


nobius

Recommended Posts

That iMac is gorgeous! But I'm sure not buying one anytime soon. If someone wants to donate one to me, I won't turn it down, though! :)

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm happy they finally updated the mini, though it's too late for me as I ended up finding a good deal on an older iMac instead when I needed a new one earlier this year.

 

Can't believe there still hasn't been an Apple TV update.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm confused as to what's different between the iPad Mini 2 and the iPad Mini 3? All I see is the 3 gets Touch ID, more LTE bands, and a gold color option. No A8, no reduction in size, weight, or thickness, and no upgraded display. What was the point of calling it a third generation? This is probably the worst incremental upgrade that I have ever seen Apple do. I'm very disappointed with this. I guess the mini is taking a backseat to the original iPad, yet again.

 

-Anthony

 

Edit: apparently, the mini 3 doesn't even have Spark support. EVEN WORSE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm excited for that new Mac Mini. I'd love to buy that mid-range one for the processor, drop in a SSD and 16GB of RAM, and get to Monoprice and buy a 4K display.

 

Or, jut plunk down the $2500 for the new 5k iMac. Yeesh. That's a lotta computer. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that the iPad Air 2 has Band 41 support for Spark, hopefully Marcelo has some revised tablet data plans to introduce.

 

Yeah, the iPad Mini 3 is a letdown. No Spark? What's up with that? Guess it didn't make the cut-off in the design stage.

 

The Apple TV is still rocking a single core A5.... Jeezus... Not even a peep from them. Sad.

Edited by ipplanman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that the iPad Air 2 has Band 41 support for Spark, hopefully Marcelo has some revised tablet data plans to introduce.

 

Yeah, the iPad Mini 3 is a letdown. No Spark? What's up with that? Guess it didn't make the cut-off in the design stage.

 

The Apple TV is still rocking a single core A5.... Jeezus... Not even a peep from them. Sad.

I won't be surprised if their will be an "IPad for life program" same deal and criteria as the iPhone 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just configured a $3,250 iMac 5k. That escalated quickly.

 

3.5GHz Quad-core Intel Core i5, Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz

32GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 4x8GB
3TB Fusion Drive
AMD Radeon R9 M290X 2GB GDDR5
Apple Magic Mouse
Apple Wireless Keyboard (English) & User's Guide
Accessory Kit

 

The RAM is not user-upgradable, so that's an additional $600 for 32GB. Yeezus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is true I may get the LTE version.

 

http://engt.co/1rgb06u

 

LOL @ Legere jumping on this like it's his genius idea.

 

 

If #Apple offered one SIM that works on multiple carriers in the new iPads, they'd be so #uncarrier!! Wait.. What?! They do?! #YEEESSSSS
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't be surprised if their will be an "IPad for life program" same deal and criteria as the iPhone 6

 

I wrote Marcelo to suggest this program a week ago.... We'll see soon I hope!

Edited by ipplanman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing holding me back from buying a cellular version iPad is the tablet data/ plan options. I personally don't understand why Sprint doesn't offer an unlimited plan on tablets, I feel both tablets and phones will use the same amount of data.

 

Now if sprint can offer an iPad for life program with unlimited data or 10gbs for a reasonable cost then I will probably get one other than that I'll just buy the wifi version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the only gains for the iPad mini 3 are Touch ID and new finish colors?  Is that really all?  Bwahaha!  I am glad I bought my iPad mini 2 both on sale and with Reward Zone certificates six months ago.  Makes me look smart.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...