Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 User Thread


COZisBack

Recommended Posts

After having the Note 4 for almost a month, and experiencing all 3 bands of LTE, Roaming, and Native service 1x and 1x800, here are a few things I notice:

 

- This phone likes to hang onto smoke signals when roaming.  For instance, my drive to work consists of roaming on Verizon, then US Cellular.  For some reason, it likes to hang onto US Cellular (makes sense PRL wise since US Cellular is on a higher priority than Verizon), however, the US Cellular signal is unusable.  The signal strength is usually -105 dbm at this point, and the Ec/Io is between -20 and -30, way beyond the usable range.  I have to cycle airplane mode to get it to switch to Verizon.

 

- Another issue I have is voice quality is worse on this device compared to my Note II.  This is especially noticeable on 1x800.  The signal will be all over the place, and I drop calls more often. 

 

- The battery life is excellent, and a good step above my Note II. 

 

Also, which PRL would be good to use for this device?  I tried flashing a few, but it won't take any of the 65xxx PRL's.  I'm currently using 56014, as that is the only one that the phone will accept.  Any ideas?

 

Overall, it's an awesome device, but the annoyances with hanging on a unusable signal and terrible 1x800 call quality are degrading my experience with the device.  Hopefully this can be corrected with later software updates.  :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After having the Note 4 for almost a month, and experiencing all 3 bands of LTE, Roaming, and Native service 1x and 1x800, here are a few things I notice:

 

- This phone likes to hang onto smoke signals when roaming. For instance, my drive to work consists of roaming on Verizon, then US Cellular. For some reason, it likes to hang onto US Cellular (makes sense PRL wise since US Cellular is on a higher priority than Verizon), however, the US Cellular signal is unusable. The signal strength is usually -105 dbm at this point, and the Ec/Io is between -20 and -30, way beyond the usable range. I have to cycle airplane mode to get it to switch to Verizon.

 

- Another issue I have is voice quality is worse on this device compared to my Note II. This is especially noticeable on 1x800. The signal will be all over the place, and I drop calls more often.

 

- The battery life is excellent, and a good step above my Note II.

 

Also, which PRL would be good to use for this device? I tried flashing a few, but it won't take any of the 65xxx PRL's. I'm currently using 56014, as that is the only one that the phone will accept. Any ideas?

 

Overall, it's an awesome device, but the annoyances with hanging on a unusable signal and terrible 1x800 call quality are degrading my experience with the device. Hopefully this can be corrected with later software updates. :P

How are you changing prls?

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By using the method described a few pages back in this thread, with DFS.

I have 513 from digiblur that worked awesome on gn2 in this market? If you want to try it pm me your email.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Another issue I have is voice quality is worse on this device compared to my Note II. This is especially noticeable on 1x800. The signal will be all over the place, and I drop calls more often.

 

 

Overall, it's an awesome device, but the annoyances with hanging on a unusable signal and terrible 1x800 call quality are degrading my experience with the device. Hopefully this can be corrected with later software updates. :P

My GN4 seems to like 1x800 as well. I'm on it almost all the time according to signal check. I've not had any voice issues at all. I've even been connecting to HD voice about half the time to known Sprint subscribers with HD voice compatible devices. It could be an issue with your phone or the local towers.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 513 from digiblur that worked awesome on gn2 in this market? If you want to try it pm me your email.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

 

Thanks for the offer, I have that one already.  I tried to flash it, but the phone remains on 55021.  If I flash 56014, it takes it just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My GN4 seems to like 1x800 as well. I'm on it almost all the time according to signal check. I've not had any voice issues at all. I've even been connecting to HD voice about half the time to known Sprint subscribers with HD voice compatible devices. It could be an issue with your phone or the local towers.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

 

I always have HD if I talk to someone with a capable device.  I've had good results with the HD every time.  I wonder if it could be my device.  Hopefully not and it's just a network issue.  We shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

- Another issue I have is voice quality is worse on this device compared to my Note II.  This is especially noticeable on 1x800.  The signal will be all over the place, and I drop calls more often. 

 

- The battery life is excellent, and a good step above my Note II. 

 

I've also had the Note 4 for about a month:

 

1) Using wi-fi calling I've never experienced voice quality like I get now...never..it is utterly

    superb and I notice this profoundly because of my hearing loss issues..I know, it's not the

    same environment you mention  (we don't have 1x800 hear yet) but still I feel advances

    have been made in audio reproduction and transmission both by Sprint & Samsung

2) Not having all the bands yet (25 41 26) I can't relate to how well this beast picks & chooses;

    seems like it favors low signal B41 to medium to good signal 25 where I do have both

    competing bands..no band 26 here

3)For the punch this guy carries around I think the battery life is killer!  I freely admit I'm on wifi a lot

   so I'm not getting the drain you get from using the on-board radios but I do a lot with the graphics

   and camera so this uses a lot of juice as I love the Quad HD screen..I can't bear to turn the

   crisp display down..the camera on this guy is just plain awesome..

 

Stay tuned..your mileage may & will vary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah that sucks I was going to try that one soon. I was awesome on my gn2

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

 

Yeah, I know...ugh lol.  The 56014 works just fine, 3G roaming and such, but when on 1x800, it shows that my phone is roaming.  If I recall, Digi set it that way on purpose.  I just need to find one that doesn't show roaming while on 1x800 that the phone will accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know...ugh lol. The 56014 works just fine, 3G roaming and such, but when on 1x800, it shows that my phone is roaming. If I recall, Digi set it that way on purpose. I just need to find one that doesn't show roaming while on 1x800.

Once I got 513 I never looked back. It was awesome here in Utah. However I tried it in AZ in the spring and it was horrible. I'll have to start looking into these now as voice performance is sub par and I rarely get on 1x800 with current prl.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the service mode screen, I assume that CA - Disabled will eventually go enabled when carrier aggregation has been rolled out.

Nope the gn4 doesn't have the capable hardware.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GN4 should have a Cat 4 Modem allowing up to 2 aggregated streams. I saw somewhere where they were going to upgrade their network with 20x20 by the end of next year. The GN5 should have a Cat 6 modem for up to 5 streams. I would think it would be a simple OTA that will enable LTE Agg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GN4 should have a Cat 4 Modem allowing up to 2 aggregated streams. I saw somewhere where they were going to upgrade their network with 20x20 by the end of next year. The GN5 should have a Cat 6 modem for up to 5 streams. I would think it would be a simple OTA that will enable LTE Agg.

Sorry but it doesn't it's been discussed already and verified that the sprint versions cat 4 modem doesn't support CA.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone heard if Samsung will sell a car charger with adaptive fast charging? There's nothing on their website yet. That seems to be where it would be nice for me. When I charge at home, it has all night to charge. No need for it to be quick.

 

Sent from my Note 4.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://smile.amazon.com/Getwow-Qualcomm®-Certified-Charger-Adapter/dp/B00Q0WTOXQ/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&qid=1417010062&sr=8-7&keywords=quick+charge+qualcomm&pebp=1417010081807

Cheap option coming?

Also home charger:

http://smile.amazon.com/Getwow-Qualcomm-Certified-Charger-Adapter/dp/B00Q0WM8KC/ref=pd_sim_sbs_cps_1?ie=UTF8&refRID=19350N2AVWC8CBAZ0S4R

 

 

I will say the only review for the car charger is an obvious paid-for review (it isn't even out yet and it is getting praise, even saying the glossy look makes it look expensive?!?  puhleez)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=56470951&postcount=62

 

Those of you who want your MSL, you can install this utility, and it works even without root. (I did have to reboot after installing for it to read the MSL for some reason)

Worked fine no reboot needed! Thank you!

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didn't work on my LG g2

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

The utility does say for Samsung phones, so likely there's something unique to Samsung.  Others have stated customer service will give it to you without reason sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...