Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I have a feeling they are going to announce a "nationwide" launch of 3x CA when the iPhone 7 launch.

 

Bookmark this page lol

 

Just waiting on the final vendors equipment to be ready it would appear, now that Nokia and Samsung are ready to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just waiting on the final vendors equipment to be ready it would appear, now that Nokia and Samsung are ready to go.

Nokia and Samsung are the two vendors.

 

 

Alcatel-Lucent is defunct as a hardware vendor don't forget!

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to be a downer, I'm calling it like I see it.  I live in Fairfax County, the most populated county in Virginia, and the most populated county in the DC metro area.  I live so close to I-95 I can hear it from my back yard and the exit ramp practically ends in front of my house, and yet I can drive less than 2 minutes and get to a site without NV upgrades or LTE, a site where T-Mobile has LTE on both AWS and 700.  (Somehow they managed to deal with it being on a power line, as did Verizon and AT&T on adjacent power line towers, so why can't Sprint?)  I can drive past that site and less than 3 minutes later I'll be in an area where I'm roaming on Verizon 1X/EV-DO, an area where Sprint allowed a permit to expire that would have filled the hole--a hole found outdoors on a highway that an exit off I-95 leads you to.  Not exactly a back road.

 

In the past year, Sprint has zero antenna permit applications on file with the county, and two granted and active antenna permits, one of which is for a microwave antenna.  For good measure, I also searched for "APC Realty" and "Mobilitie" since I have seen Sprint applications under the first name and could imagine some under the second.  None found.  In the entire county.

 

By contrast, AT&T has two or three pages of permit search results in the last year, T-Mobile has three or four pages of permit search results in the last year, and Verizon has at least six pages.

 

I'm glad to hear they're talking less and doing more, I'm just not entirely sure where else I should be looking for evidence of all this work that's supposedly being done.  It's clearly not being done here.  I have seen zero evidence of any small cells, additional Clearwire/IDEN conversions, new sites, or new B41 equipment being installed.  As far as I can tell, all work here has stopped.  If I'm looking in the wrong places, please tell me.  I want to believe Sprint is continuing to improve, but I can't find any evidence to support it.

 

- Trip

 

I feel your pain. No new permits in a year and a half here. And that powerline story sounds familiar. T-Mobile just took up Cricket's spot and managed to get tower-mounted RRUs and full size antennas permitted on a slim flagpole site near me that required some pretty extensive aesthetic modifications (the site looks kinda like a thin Seattle Space Needle now). Sprint GMO'd it in 2014 and hasn't touched it since.

 

The GMOs really sting. We've got a couple that really give Sprint a bad reputation around here because they happen to be in bad spots. That's something I don't get: all of the other carriers seem to be able to prioritize and fix pain-points at a hyper-local level whereas Sprint will just go through and upgrade as many sites in a market as they can in one pass and leave anything that they couldn't get to whether the non-upgraded site is next to a huge mall or in the middle of a corn field. The other three will do what they need to do to fix the mall site immediately and they’ll even eventually get around to the cornfield site. Sprint will let both sit indefinitely. I know my time watching this stuff is pretty limited compared to many others here, but from where I’ve been sitting for the past three years it looks like when a site isn’t done right the first time (i.e. subcontractor permit screwups, site owner negotiation problems, structural limitations) they just call it a day and leave it until total equipment failure happens. The result is a very inconsistent experience depending on where you live. I can drive from a GMO LTE build to a triband full build to a congested dualband full build to a non-functional 3G GMO to no service in about 15 minutes depending on traffic without leaving suburban south Charlotte. When it’s good it’s great, but when it’s bad it’s like I’m back in 2011. The lack of new sites doesn't help.

 

But I don't think it's fair to put all of the blame on Sprint's new executives or even past executives here. Since before NV started they have never really had a surplus of cash that would be required to go back and fix bad sites. And there's some good news. Even with Sprint's lingering cash deficiencies they appear to be doing serious infill work in critical markets to make the network more consistent. They're still trialing new small cell types. They are appointing regional managers whose duties include local network patchwork. And they’re quite surprisingly taking small cells a lot more seriously than T-Mobile (and AT&T too from what I can tell) which allow them to really fix hyper-local network holes.

 

And have billions of dollars in debt maturing this year and next year. 

 

Oh and they cut their CAPEX by billions. 

 

I wonder where that CAPEX money went... hmmm...

 

^^^ this is really unfortunate timing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD Powers released a few days ago that Sprint ranked higher than Att and T-Mobile, second after Verizon in terms of problems customers encountered with their networks.  This is a surprise.  I would never thought Sprint is better than Att or even T-mobile.  

Also the early root metrics release for 2nd half show that Tmobile is falling behind, first place finishes are less than 1st half whereas Sprint's first places finishes are trending up.  Verizon is holding up well and same is true for Att.  Well I guess relatively, Son and Marcelo are doing something right with their limited capital spending.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD Powers released a few days ago that Sprint ranked higher than Att and T-Mobile, second after Verizon in terms of problems customers encountered with their networks. This is a surprise. I would never thought Sprint is better than Att or even T-mobile.

Also the early root metrics release for 2nd half show that Tmobile is falling behind, first place finishes are less than 1st half whereas Sprint's first places finishes are trending up. Verizon is holding up well and same is true for Att. Well I guess relatively, Son and Marcelo are doing something right with their limited capital spending.

 

Wow I'm very impressed and shocked.

 

Well the old adage -- Thin to Win -- does work. Kudos for them.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD Powers released a few days ago that Sprint ranked higher than Att and T-Mobile, second after Verizon in terms of problems customers encountered with their networks.  This is a surprise.  I would never thought Sprint is better than Att or even T-mobile.  

Also the early root metrics release for 2nd half show that Tmobile is falling behind, first place finishes are less than 1st half whereas Sprint's first places finishes are trending up.  Verizon is holding up well and same is true for Att.  Well I guess relatively, Son and Marcelo are doing something right with their limited capital spending.

 

 

Link to this for those wondering/not wanting to go searching for it.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) No salesperson will ever mention speed limits. "You get unlimited data including unlimited standard definition video". Who cares about 500Kbps of streaming music or 2Mbps for gaming? No one is that hardcore, no need to mention it. Want HD video? $20 on top of $60

2) At 9Mbps you can watch HD video, and at $45 that would destroy the quality of the network because everyone would be on it. Bad idea.

 

True. This is a reason why these limits are a bad idea for Sprint to implement. There already is enough complaints online against Sprint over the 50% discount mess, with people complaining they were quoted differently than they were billed, etc. When people start noticing their Tidal HiFi usage isn't right over Sprint's Unlimited Freedom plan limitation to 500kbps, they will complain about how they weren't told of the limit an how they wouldn't have switched to Sprint otherwise knowing they'd have to pay more for service that worked with that properly. Same could be said among gamers not told of the limitation.

 

This just makes things confusing to consumers whenever it is they find out about it and then have to calculate their usage. The whole point of Unlimited Data is to remove those complications based on the term "Unlimited", typically meaning "No limits". I'm only supportive of such stipulations where there is a flat across the board policy among all uses, such as Cricket saying "LTE maxed out at 8mbps", since all forms of usage is throttled to that maximum speed. I can understand having different speed tiers too, so long as it covers all forms of usage. 

Yeah I pretty positive that normal folk (that excludes most people reading this) just want to have FB posts occur quickly - send photos or videos to friends - and stream pandora. If it works they are happy.

 

Maybe I'm wrong.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

There certainly are people like that and they probably won't notice any difference with the speed limitations. However, there are those that will, and a great many of them will complain about it and leave Sprint. Currently, Sprint needs new customers and they need to keep them. Building a great network will certainly help with that, but first Sprint has to offer great rates that people both understand and know that they will have a level of service that works for all of their usage. Sprint could do this easily by removing the speed limitations. The Unlimited Freedom plan without them is a great deal, no doubt. As the example I used here the other day, Sprint is offering through their Employee Referring Customers plan two lines for $90 monthly, This is the exact great rate I had on T-Mobile. This could be like SERO part two, if Sprint removed the speed limits and advertised this quietly through the internet.

 

When I was on HowardForums back in mid2000s when SERO came around, I had a friend who worked at Sprint who gave me their employee number and gave me permission to give it out for people to join. I got dozens of requests per day back then from people on HF. Those are customers Sprint could gain, even with a reasonable across the board speed cap in place, if indeed it does help the network somehow. Otherwise, drop the speed cap and watch the customers rush to sign up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was just posted on Günther Ottendorfer COO FB page. Thing I noticed right away after they zoomed into the speed results were the upload speeds. Seems like they are still on the same TDD Config version. That would explain the lower peak download speeds.

 

 

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=176960726067550&id=100012608712657

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. This is a reason why these limits are a bad idea for Sprint to implement. There already is enough complaints online against Sprint over the 50% discount mess, with people complaining they were quoted differently than they were billed, etc. When people start noticing their Tidal HiFi usage isn't right over Sprint's Unlimited Freedom plan limitation to 500kbps, they will complain about how they weren't told of the limit an how they wouldn't have switched to Sprint otherwise knowing they'd have to pay more for service that worked with that properly. Same could be said among gamers not told of the limitation.

 

This just makes things confusing to consumers whenever it is they find out about it and then have to calculate their usage. The whole point of Unlimited Data is to remove those complications based on the term "Unlimited", typically meaning "No limits". I'm only supportive of such stipulations where there is a flat across the board policy among all uses, such as Cricket saying "LTE maxed out at 8mbps", since all forms of usage is throttled to that maximum speed. I can understand having different speed tiers too, so long as it covers all forms of usage.

 

There certainly are people like that and they probably won't notice any difference with the speed limitations. However, there are those that will, and a great many of them will complain about it and leave Sprint. Currently, Sprint needs new customers and they need to keep them. Building a great network will certainly help with that, but first Sprint has to offer great rates that people both understand and know that they will have a level of service that works for all of their usage. Sprint could do this easily by removing the speed limitations. The Unlimited Freedom plan without them is a great deal, no doubt. As the example I used here the other day, Sprint is offering through their Employee Referring Customers plan two lines for $90 monthly, This is the exact great rate I had on T-Mobile. This could be like SERO part two, if Sprint removed the speed limits and advertised this quietly through the internet.

 

When I was on HowardForums back in mid2000s when SERO came around, I had a friend who worked at Sprint who gave me their employee number and gave me permission to give it out for people to join. I got dozens of requests per day back then from people on HF. Those are customers Sprint could gain, even with a reasonable across the board speed cap in place, if indeed it does help the network somehow. Otherwise, drop the speed cap and watch the customers rush to sign up.

 

 

I may be wrong -- but Sero users basically just give sprint revenue.

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong -- but Sero users basically just give sprint revenue.

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I just remember the massive popularity of SERO, which if Sprint were to want something positive to show towards people who generally think negatively about Sprint, perhaps bringing SERO back in a new, affordable form may help them get customers signing up, which means more revenue. Sprint could call the plan "Sprint Everything, Really! Offer" with no limits whatsoever at $45 monthly. I know it sounds silly and that is a pretty low cost, unless you consider the additional line rates Sprint and other carriers are charging below that price point, you've got a plan that wins. Sprint already essentially is charging that for Unlimited Data with two lines under their Employee Referring Customers offer, so I can't see doing this as a loss at all to Sprint, just so Sprint keeps a watch well enough over its network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except 5G isn't commercially deployed. When Sprint tested CA in 2014 and was getting insanely high speeds of 1Gbps+ we all said "cool but that's obviously not happening on our phone anytime soon". Likewise for VZW and 5G.

 

Sprint's press releases about 3xCA and getting 230Mbps is something that is happening in the field today and can be utilized by devices that are out now (even though they require a software update). That's the difference.

 

It's nice but who cares if I am 230 and 2blocks later on 3G???

 

Don't get me wrong I like 3xcA but would much rather these damn towers get optimized, get their fiber or microwave going. There are way to many areas that are lacking so far into the project

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice but who cares if I am 230 and 2blocks later on 3G???

 

Don't get me wrong I like 3xcA but would much rather these damn towers get optimized, get their fiber or microwave going. There are way to many areas that are lacking so far into the project

You need to get in contact with your local regional manager or higher ups so that they can optimize the area's you visit. I have done it two or three times the last few years with awesome results.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice but who cares if I am 230 and 2blocks later on 3G???

 

Don't get me wrong I like 3xcA but would much rather these damn towers get optimized, get their fiber or microwave going. There are way to many areas that are lacking so far into the project

2 blocks? Come on, quit your trolling, you have 3 additional carriers to pick from if you're so frustrated with Sprints performance. Most of them offering incentives for your business.

 

Sent from my SM-N930P using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to get in contact with your local regional manager or higher ups so that they can optimize the area's you visit. I have done it two or three times the last few years with awesome results.

I doubt I get a response.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last 2 times I tweeted Marcelo/Marci/Sprintcare and got great results.

No I get great results via sprintcares via Marcelo!!!

 

I'm referring to the regional person based off of his twitter account, which is 95% filed with retweets from other events.

 

I'll give the benefit of the doubt by waiting a few days to see if he responds.

 

In my area Sprint pulled the majority of upgrades and no pending new requests.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nice but who cares if I am 230 and 2blocks later on 3G???

 

Don't get me wrong I like 3xcA but would much rather these damn towers get optimized, get their fiber or microwave going. There are way to many areas that are lacking so far into the project

 

 

I can sympathize but I can't empathize. The only time I see 3G is on I-84 is around the border of Connecticut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have another idea that might help Sprint if they went back to having a $75 monthly Unlimited Data plan with no additional line discounts, yet they could remove the restrictions on it. Then, Sprint could apply a $30 monthly discount on lines that had an active device EIP or device lease, making the rate $45 monthly, instead of $75 monthly, so long as there is an active monthly payment on a device for that line.

 

If Sprint offered this, it might be a great way of not only getting customers onto Sprint, but increase store traffic with people getting devices and upgrades, which accessories would get sold more often to go along with the device purchases/leases. Plus, smartphone manufacturers might be impressed upon Sprint having this arrangement and be more willing to have their devices work on the Sprint network. In turn, business would be up and Sprint would have more money to do the necessary and desired network additions/upgrades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 blocks? Come on, quit your trolling, you have 3 additional carriers to pick from if you're so frustrated with Sprints performance. Most of them offering incentives for your business.

 

Sent from my SM-N930P using Tapatalk

 

Lol, yeah trolling. Austin, MN is perfect example of the two blocks of Band 41. Literally only get Band 41 on north side of town if outside and for a few blocks. Specifically this area: http://imgur.com/a/IUpE4

 

Though where there is density, e.g. downtown Minneapolis, it's fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
    • https://www.phonearena.com/news/t-mobile-older-rate-plan-prices-june_id157821 We're on Sprint Max for our seven phone/two Apple Watch (with Cellular) family plan... Because it doesn't make sense to switch to anything else, especially if we can't even finance all of our devices. Some of you may recall that T-Mobile suddenly cut our credit limit to $1,500 (which is barely more than one iPhone 15 Pro) with no notice at all. I escalated it to the Office of the CEO and was told to pound sand, even though I have 800+ Credit as a longtime customer and was suddenly being treated as a deadbeat. I ultimately upgraded my three iPhone lines directly through Apple and they're Unlocked. I haven't bothered to check on whether my Credit Limit has updated, but I don't plan on upgrading them through T-Mobile again. I guess we'll find out if "Sprint Max" counts as "older" soon enough.
    • From just under a week ago: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-announces-163-million-in-completed-network-upgrades-for-arkansas Progress!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...