Jump to content

Sprint to expand to Montana using shut down CellularOne sites


Recommended Posts

Nah, it was the popularity of the Evo and lack of investments that crippled the network.

 

This.  I remember when I first got the Evo, my 3g speeds were decent (usually 600kbps -1mbs) but I was waiting for more Wimax coverage.  Unfortunately Wimax was nothing but a bunch of hot spots around town and I saw my 3g speeds decline over the next 6 months until it became almost unusable in many places around Houston.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The above SignalCheck Pro and engineering screenshots have nothing to do with the takeover of Chinook PCS sites.  The screenshots are of Nemont Communications, a local CDMA2000 operator.

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseMarketSum.jsp?licKey=2360492

http://www.nemont.net/pdfs/Nemont-local-wireless-coverage.pdf

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The above SignalCheck Pro and engineering screenshots have nothing to do with the takeover of Chinook PCS sites.  

 

AJ

Do we know the location of Chinook PCS sites in Billings, MT?  If so I'll specifically focus on them, otherwise I'll drive around and look at all sites that I can find. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we know the location of Chinook PCS sites in Billings, MT?  If so I'll specifically focus on them, otherwise I'll drive around and look at all sites that I can find. 

 

No, not that I am aware.  Billings is not that large of a city, though, so Chinook PCS sites should not be that hard to find.  However, that would be largely a waste of your time.  The Chinook sites have been turned off, some may have been decommissioned, but they are all W-CDMA/GSM or GSM only sites.  The infrastructure is of no use to Sprint.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What may be happening now at some Chinook PCS sites though is installation of Samsung NV equipment. And that would be good to look for around Billings.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Is there a timeframe when Sprint will have the network up and running? There is a core CDMA network and will that be used first before going full NV on Montana?

 

We aren't aware of any details, yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have to say I helped a couple of offices migrate from T lines to FTTP and this is totally true. In my case I had to enact my backup plan because WindStream literally pushed the date like 4 times. I ended up going with Comcast Metro Ethernet and boy were they a TON easier/cheaper to deal with.

 

I went through this same thing at my office but with Metro Ethernet... absolute worst telecom experience of my life. I wish it upon noone.

 

We were using 4 bonded T1's w/ a MPLS link to another office with T's as well. It was supposed to be a 20 meg line, and 4.5 months later I ended up with 10 megs (after multiple visits, 'line conditioning', plus a couple visits where techs showed up with no clue what they were doing) -- coming up on nearly a year and it's still at 10.

 

My CLEC XO Networks says Centurylink can't deliver enough clean pairs to provide me the 20 megs that they swear are available; Centurylink says that XO's equipment can't support the additional pairs, but if it could, they'd totally install them -- THEN XO calls and says "we'll just bring fiber to the premises" -- no build charge -- HELL YES I say... CenturyLink says their still waiting on the orders -- but it'd be a 70 grand job if I ordered from them... Meanwhile I constantly have 1-2 of my 8 pairs inoperable and our service is more like 7-8 megs (Comcast can't build to our location for less than 100 grand as no cable even comes up this far let alone FTTP -- but at least the guy who came out and inspected was honest and upfront).

 

I wish I would have just added a couple more T1's and sat happy with 9 megs. The T1's were rock solid. So if the cell companies are dealing with ANYTHING like this with thousands and thousands of sites, I can only imagine the PURE HELL and feel a little more sympathetic about the delays....

 

Back on topic -- MTPCS used the 10 mhz. F block in central and eastern Montana. Not a large amount of spectrum, and nothing contiguous with Sprint. That said, it is contiguous with AT&T, who has the lower C block in these locations -- and it makes perfect sense. Especially if Sprint reclaims the 10 mhz. lease they had to AT&T in the middle of their B block...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone has a theory on the Montana FIT -- but I just have a feeling they are located on Sprint's towers that they acquired from Qwest in 2004... If you remember, Qwest provided native service in Montana, then Sprint did for a few years after they got ahold of them until the Alltel thing happened -- and even after the Alltel thing happened it also appeared to me, since I was in Billings and Butte and while my Blackberry happily camped on Alltel's 850 1x and EV-DO as native, my Epic 4G camped on native Sprint, using the Spokane SID for 1x at PCS, while Alltel's EV-DO for data -- but only in the old Qwest areas; everywhere else it picked up Alltel for both... so up until around 2011 Sprint still had CDMA on these towers... apparently when AT&T pulled the plug, they also pulled their native 1x service off the Qwest towers...

 

Here are two examples that are under the Sprint name:

 

This one is active:

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/asrRegistration.jsp?regKey=2612078

 

...one that was dismantled:

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/asrRegistration.jsp?regKey=2612652

 

 

I did this search two years ago and came up with a lot more that had been renewed in 2010 (16 sites IIRC which was about the number of sites Qwest had in Montana) and under the Sprint name at that but can't seem to find them now. I have a feeling they leased them out to CCR or someone else -- since if they would have dismantled them they would have shown up.. so the only way to track them down would be to look at all the towers and find the ones originally built by US West Wireless... that will be labor intensive.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Here's our song for Marcelo

 

 

Maybe Marie and Marcelo can meet up to announce new service in Montana in a few months?  :lol:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would imagine with the new debt they have taken up for equipment, some of said equipment would go to Montana

 

I was thinking that might be a possibility. That might partially explain why Samsung's financing was significantly larger than ALUs...all though it doesn't explain the amount Nokia provided (of course maybe that might be needed to clean up after Ericsson)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking that might be a possibility. That might partially explain why Samsung's financing was significantly larger than ALUs...all though it doesn't explain the amount Nokia provided (of course maybe that might be needed to clean up after Ericsson)...

Probably planning to split Montana, Wyoming, and the Dakotas between the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quarterly bump. Any new news or at least wild rumors on this?

Considering the first buildout deadlines for some of Sprint's licenses are in March 2016, and that it takes 12-16 months to deploy a network of sufficient size in a brand new market, I would definitely expect to hear some rumblings of activity from Montana by this spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

:secret: any site reports?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the first buildout deadlines for some of Sprint's licenses are in March 2016, and that it takes 12-16 months to deploy a network of sufficient size in a brand new market, I would definitely expect to hear some rumblings of activity from Montana by this spring.

 

Couldn't Sprint just deploy 1 site per city since 800 has the range to cover an entire city?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That'd be so bad. Too many users for one tower. Sprint is just gonna  build out on all of those old CellularOne sites.

 

Are there existing subs in Montana?  For Montana it might work just to get it going and fill in as user base grows.  Each site would have coverage for 800, 1900 and 2.5 at full power.  Just 1xAdvance alone could take a lot of voice load?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there existing subs in Montana?  For Montana it might work just to get it going and fill in as user base grows.  Each site would have coverage for 800, 1900 and 2.5 at full power.  Just 1xAdvance alone could take a lot of voice load?  

 

If Sprint were to do that people wouldn't come because coverage would be poor in too many places. If people did come, the network would get loaded way to quickly. If you want to put one tower in a small town, that's one thing. But one tower in a city is not nearly enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yes! That does keep it from wandering off Dish and most importantly, reconnecting immediately (at least where there is n70). Thanks!
    • I have my Dish phone locked to NR-only.  That keeps it on Dish and only occasionally will it see T-Mobile NR SA for brief periods before going to no service. I also don't have mine band locked beyond that, except that I have some of the unused bands turned off just to try to reduce scan time.  Fortunately, my Dish phone is the one with the MediaTek chipset, so it has NR neighbor cells, and I can usually see n71, n70, n66, and sometimes n29 (market-dependent) through those regardless of which band it's connected to as primary. - Trip
    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...