Jump to content

S4GRU temporarily not accessible from some ISP's


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

Based on some reports from members not being able to access S4GRU from Comcast and some other ISP's, I opened up a ticket with IPBoard.  See IPBoard's response below:

 

...This is a wide spread issue with some major ISP's and not related to our services locally, the providers are aware of the issue and are working to correct it.

 

So, it sounds like a major internet outage issue is occurring somewhere.  It is not affecting all ISP's.  You may want to try using S4GRU thorough your mobile wireless device in the interim.  Hopefully it will be rectified soon.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if they can't access S4GRU, how are they going to see the post? [emoji1]

 

I did see chatter on the outages mailing list about a widespread outage. No details unfortunately.

 

The same way it was reported to me.  By using another ISP, especially their wireless provider.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Widespread outage:

 

Comcast http://downdetector.com/status/comcast-xfinity/map

AT&T http://downdetector.com/status/att/map/

 

Even Level 3 is majorly impacted in some areas:  http://downdetector.com/status/level3/map/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an explanation to the outages:

 

There is currently a very wide spread issue affecting several major ISPs. The global routing table for IPv4 went over 512k routes this morning which was the default on many routers causing memory issues.

IPv6 can't come soon enough.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The internet is down??!! :frantic:

 

IT IS THE APOCALYPSE!!!

 

Skynet has become self aware 17 years late.  Cyber attacks on the Internet are now more effective against the human race than are terminator attacks.

 

Now, for a little bit of fun during this outage, I will contribute to S4GRU a $10 donation in the name of the first member to write why my facetious post is still particularly relevant.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Leftover Magentians have started their attack. Run for your lives.

 

 

Skynet has become self aware 17 years late.  Cyber attacks on the Internet are now more effective against the human race than are terminator attacks.

Actually I think its Colossus and Guardian becoming one, which supersede Skynet by quite a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something similar happened to another forum I go to that uses IP board. Weird!

It was a lot of sites around the country. Not just IPBoard sites. I blame the melancholy ferret people.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skynet has become self aware 17 years late.  Cyber attacks on the Internet are now more effective against the human race than are terminator attacks.

 

Now, for a little bit of fun during this outage, I will contribute to S4GRU a $10 donation in the name of the first member to write why my facetious post is still particularly relevant.

 

AJ

 

So you are saying that John Legere's real name is Serena Kogan and that M. Claure is actually John Conner, and that today, August 12, is the real start of the apocalypse, even though it's now 2014 and not 1997, and that by 2018 we are all going to be nuclear toast (and our B41 cannot save us because it will be installed too late -- okay I added that one).  Yet you don't account for the fact that August 12, 1997 was itself already nearly 22 years too late (ref: December 1, 1975). :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are saying that John Legere's real name is Serena Kogan and that M. Claure is actually John Conner, and that today, August 12, is the real start of the apocalypse, even though it's now 2014 and not 1997, and that by 2018 we are all going to be nuclear toast (and our B41 cannot save us because it will be installed too late -- okay I added that one).  Yet you don't account for the fact that August 12, 1997 was itself already nearly 22 years too late (ref: December 1, 1975). :wacko:

 

So, do you want the $10 or not?

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, do you want the $10 or not?

 

AJ

I would like to match it and ask Robert to apply it to someone who could benefit from a status uplift.

 

(BTW, for my obscure reference, Google "Dial F for Frankenstein".)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to match it and ask Robert to apply it to someone who could benefit from a status uplift.

 

(BTW, for my obscure reference, Google "Dial F for Frankenstein".)

 

It can be added to the S4GRU Scholarship Fund, if you like.  That is where we fund sponsor status and upgrades to worthy individual out of.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...