Jump to content

Sprint Reportedly Bowing Out of T-Mobile Bid (was "Sprint offer" and "Iliad" threads)


thepowerofdonuts

Recommended Posts

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 15 January 2011

 

I figured I would see LTE before WiMax too. She may have just seen the 4G icon as it was trying to connect and thought it was connected...

Everytime I see those ping numbers comparing providers I laugh. They always show Sprint worse than I experience and AT&T better than I experience.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know of anyone that has been throttled? I am still curious to see if sprint is actually throttling people above 5gb this month or if they raised the limit after much consumer complaint.

 

I would expect the top 5 percent throttling to take a month to kick in following the initiation date earlier this month.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“T-Mobile is loved by regulators. Before, Legere was just half a maverick. After, he will be twice as crazy with double the asset base to work with.”

 

I read that quote and had a good chuckle. [Via]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well 12GB (no idea how I got that high, and no throttle). I did try to load some web pages today, and it tookva few tries to get it to load.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well 12GB (no idea how I got that high, and no throttle). I did try to load some web pages today, and it tookva few tries to get it to load.

That's been happening to me on both wifi and cellular data on and off the past few days here in California.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's been happening to me on both wifi and cellular data on and off the past few days here in California.

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Yeah my WiFi has been severely slow ping wise. 400+ms ping, jumping to sub 30ms ping and back high. Either my nexus Is acting up or networks are being funky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/don-t-let-sprint-buy-t-mobile

 

In which Susan Crawford laments a duopoly yet doesn't want a true challenger to that duopoly.

 

Here is the other side of it.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/let-sprint-buy-t-mobile

 

 

Wouldn't a combined company be able to leverage cheaper equipment from vendors? Especially if they expand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the other side of it.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/let-sprint-buy-t-mobile

 

 

Wouldn't a combined company be able to leverage cheaper equipment from vendors? Especially if they expand?

Yes, they would be able to purchase cheaper equipment.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the other side of it.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-06-10/let-sprint-buy-t-mobile

 

 

Wouldn't a combined company be able to leverage cheaper equipment from vendors? Especially if they expand?

There are actually some intelligent comments on that article. I was surprised by how many were in favor of the merger. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are actually some intelligent comments on that article. I was surprised by how many were in favor of the merger.

 

Yes a lot more intelligent than most articles posted regarding the words Sprint in it.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's free cash flow is affected by the massive capex outlay...

The 7 billion in capex Sprint has spent the last two years is about the same AT&T and Verizon spent for each of the last five years. This is the main arguement in favor of the merger vzw and AT&T can spend that much and still generate all the free cash flow of the industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 7 billion in capex Sprint has spent the last two years is about the same AT&T and Verizon spent for each of the last five years. This is the main arguement in favor of the merger vzw and AT&T can spend that much and still generate all the free cash flow of the industry.

Yep, I have been in support of the merger forever, although the two companies could have undertaken a joint venture to deploy LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.pcmag.com/fastest-mobile-networks

 

Accurate or flawed, sprint just cant catch a break. 2014 is just not shaping up to be sprints year, at least not with the media.

This helps frame a flawed argument that "sprint needs tmobile".

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

Since testing is done over a period of months or a year with most of these performance type stories, it will not be good for Sprint.  So even if things are much better right now, we are going to hear about how they were last quarter or last year.  Tmo was in a better position last year and will come off better in these analyses.

 

The best Sprint can do at this point for 2014 is starting to get good press by the end of the year and maybe relegate AT&T to last place.  AT&T is degrading at the moment and Sprint is improving.  That should be their next goal when this all happens again in 3-4 months.

 

Robert

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best Sprint can do at this point for 2014 is starting to get good press by the end of the year and maybe relegate AT&T to last place.  AT&T is degrading at the moment and Sprint is improving.  That should be their next goal when this all happens again in 3-4 months.

 

Robert

Already been happening in Manhattan over the past three months. Sprint's median data rates have surpassed AT&T's. http://explorer.netindex.com/maps

It should only get better once TDD LTE grid gets denser on the island, and TDD capacity layer should absolutely shine in this kind of environment.

 

5Ul2IfM.png

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since testing is done over a period of months or a year with most of these performance type stories, it will not be good for Sprint.

 

Robert

Well, actually the article says the tests were conducted from May 1st to May 23rd, which is a tight enough window for a test of this scale. Edited by CaptainSlow
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, actually the article says the tests were conducted from May 1st to May 23rd, which is a tight enough window for a test of this scale.

 

I wasn't addressing this specific test.  I was addressing JeffDTD's point that this is going to be a problem for Sprint throughout 2014.  It will be a common theme, however, probably starting to get better than AT&T in many markets.  And it looks like that is starting to happen as Milan pointed out above.

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh. I really hope this merger goes through and Masa knows what he is doing. Could 2 billion be enough for tmobile to complete their plan to expand HSPA and LTE to edge sites by the end of 2015? If so, Sprint is about to become number 4.

 

For some reason that video does not work on safari for me. Heres this http://seekingalpha.com/news/1799763-cnbc-sprint-t-mobile-agree-on-2b-breakup-fee-name

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want the name to be T-Mobile. That's counter-intuitive to Masa's goal.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Your referring to the $25.00 a month Infinite Unlimited plan?  I don't see any other plans on there even cheaper than that on their website.  I was looking at the Motorola 2023 Edge fwiw as well for $10.00 a month. 
    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...