Jump to content

Google to give Nexus the boot?


Recommended Posts

So, according to this link— androidauthority.com/android-silver-retiring-nexus-374512/ —and many others, Google plans to kick the Nexus line to the curb and start up "Android Silver" —which is basically Google Play Edition with more +'s. According gto Android Authority, there will be minimal bloatware, and all bloated apps must be easily uninstalled without rooting the device. Also, Google will tell the manufacturers the specs that the device must have. There's more to read on their site, but what I wanted to ask is this: Do you think Google is ready to abandon the Nexus line and start Android Silver? Why or why not? As for myself, I have no idea. It doesn't seem likely but anything can happen in the phone world.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's beneficial for Google to demand this move. You'll now get the majority of flagship devices in Google Editions with the options of having them on any (most) provider with the release of the latest Android updates.

 

It's taking the Nexus line to greater heights under a new name.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, according to this link— androidauthority.com/android-silver-retiring-nexus-374512/ —and many others, Google plans to kick the Nexus line to the curb and start up "Android Silver" —which is basically Google Play Edition with more +'s. According gto Android Authority, there will be minimal bloatware, and all bloated apps must be easily uninstalled without rooting the device. Also, Google will tell the manufacturers the specs that the device must have. There's more to read on their site, but what I wanted to ask is this: Do you think Google is ready to abandon the Nexus line and start Android Silver? Why or why not? As for myself, I have no idea. It doesn't seem likely but anything can happen in the phone world.

I don't think Google would at this point and time. It would essentially ruin their main goal with the nexus line, a flagship phone at or less than half the cost of all the others (excluding the new CM1+1). Unless the respective phone makers allowed them to set the cost of gpe phones which I highly doubt, considering they've been even more expensive in the past. Plus with nexus devices (including tablets) becoming increasingly more popular I'd think Google would be actually making profit off them now even if they sell them at a loss. Why ruin an increasingly more useful product line when they have no need to?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Google would at this point and time. It would essentially ruin their main goal with the nexus line, a flagship phone at or less than half the cost of all the others (excluding the new CM1+1).

 

There have already been talks of the 2014 Nexus 5 (or whatever) being the final release. Even though rumors, I see it as a possibility. Google's attempt at having an affordable smartphone is still being outshined by the flagship devices of HTC, LG and Samsung.

 

As much as I love the Nexus smartphone, the swing of "smart-pay" like options are changing a lot of buyers thoughts on cost of smartphones.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have already been talks of the 2014 Nexus 5 (or whatever) being the final release. Even though rumors, I see it as a possibility. Google's attempt at having an affordable smartphone is still being outshined by the flagship devices of HTC, LG and Samsung.

 

As much as I love the Nexus smartphone, the swing of "smart-pay" like options are changing a lot of buyers thoughts on cost of smartphones.

I fully understand why they'd be throwing it around, and the reasons behind it. However I also see a slew of reasons why to not do it. Honestly I'd like to see more gpe phones (especially Samsung considering how hard it is to root and unlock them now) and the nexus phones stick around for those who want a high quality device at a more affordable price point.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fully understand why they'd be throwing it around, and the reasons behind it. However I also see a slew of reasons why to not do it. Honestly I'd like to see more gpe phones (especially Samsung considering how hard it is to root and unlock them now) and the nexus phones stick around for those who want a high quality device at a more affordable price point.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Agreed. Hopefully we get the both of best. Hell, they may just roll the "Nexus Type" device into this new line. Just at an affordable price.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Hopefully we get the both of best. Hell, they may just roll the "Nexus Type" device into this new line. Just at an affordable price.

 

I don't think I would go to anything other than the next Nexus after having the Nexus5.  Just a huge breath of fresh air after doing ROMs for HTC and Samsung.  I didn't have to do my own ROM for the Nexus5 and there's a huge reason why.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Google would at this point and time. It would essentially ruin their main goal with the nexus line, a flagship phone at or less than half the cost of all the others (excluding the new CM1+1). Unless the respective phone makers allowed them to set the cost of gpe phones which I highly doubt, considering they've been even more expensive in the past. Plus with nexus devices (including tablets) becoming increasingly more popular I'd think Google would be actually making profit off them now even if they sell them at a loss. Why ruin an increasingly more useful product line when they have no need to?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

LOL, how can they make a profit even if they are selling them at a loss?  Anyway, Google's intent with the nexus line was never to make a profit.   Nexus devices, which were mainly geared towards developers/enthusiast, where never meant to be as mainstream as iphone/galaxy devices, if that was the case you would have seen google themselves pushing to move units by marketing/advertising as much as apple and samsung.  Google makes their money off of ad revenue so whatever profit they may have gotten from hardware sales would be too small to even quantify when compared to their main revenue source which is ad revenue. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I would go to anything other than the next Nexus after having the Nexus5.  Just a huge breath of fresh air after doing ROMs for HTC and Samsung.  I didn't have to do my own ROM for the Nexus5 and there's a huge reason why.

If the n5 continues to be the king of lte connectivity, I will probably keep mines until the wheels fall off regardless of whatever device comes out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the n5 continues to be the king of lte connectivity, I will probably keep mines until the wheels fall off regardless of whatever device comes out.

 

I think that's why I'm in the hunt for one, in the price range I want to spend off contract.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if there has been considerable Nexus pushback from Android handset OEMs.  Basically, they get to manufacture high end handsets for Google, which then sells them at a cut rate, thereby undercutting the OEMs' own branded flagships.  Like it or not, Google, unlike Apple, needs the triumvirate of Samsung, HTC, and LG.  Otherwise, Android is in deep trouble, since Google's full vertical integration via Motorola did not last long at all.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if there has been considerable Nexus pushback from Android handset OEMs.  Basically, they get to manufacture high end handsets for Google, which then sells them at a cut rate, thereby undercutting the OEMs' own branded flagships.  Like it or not, Google, unlike Apple, needs the triumvirate of Samsung, HTC, and LG.  Otherwise, Android is in deep trouble, since Google's full vertical integration via Motorola did not last long at all.

 

AJ

On top of that AJ the Nexus line was always meant to push development of Android. Perhaps Google feels that they have accomplished that. I also heard that Google owning Motorola caused issues with the OEM's. I would not be surprised if the promise to sell Motorola and a bigger piece of the "Nexus" prize kept the OEM's happy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I would go to anything other than the next Nexus after having the Nexus5.  Just a huge breath of fresh air after doing ROMs for HTC and Samsung.  I didn't have to do my own ROM for the Nexus5 and there's a huge reason why.

Amen to that. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I would go to anything other than the next Nexus after having the Nexus5.  Just a huge breath of fresh air after doing ROMs for HTC and Samsung.  I didn't have to do my own ROM for the Nexus5 and there's a huge reason why.

 

Amen to that. 

 

Times three. On my Galaxy Nexus I always felt as thought I needed a Custom ROM (CM) to have the phone working as well as it could (which was till a little wonky at times... !@%$ the trash CDMA radio they put in that thing, I am no longer in denial about that digiblur)... the Nexus 5 on Stock 4.4.2 does exactly what I need it to, and flawlessly, no BS.

 

Long live Nexus (or whatever Google decides to call it)...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

http://www.androidheadlines.com/2014/05/lg-device-snapdragon-810-chipset-rumored-android-silver-product.html

 

So the rumos is Nexus is dead. I know this might be off topic but I'm wondering what nexus 5 owners feel about this.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

The same feeling when evleaks said the LG D820 was not the nexus 5. I'll believe it when I see it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That article is terrible. All evleaks said is there won't be a nexus 6... Which means It will simply be called something else.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Wouldn't there be a copyright issue with Nexus 6? Isn't t at the line of replicates in the Blade Runner book and movie?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't there be a copyright issue with Nexus 6? Isn't t at the line of replicates in the Blade Runner book and movie?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Different uses of the name, so no.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different uses of the name, so no.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Maybe not. Verizon licensed Droid didn't they? Then again I have no clue. I'm just arm chair quarter backing this one.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe not. Verizon licensed Droid didn't they? Then again I have no clue. I'm just arm chair quarter backing this one.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Yeah Verizon licensed droid from lucasfilm because they had a trademark on the word Droid. Blade runner also referenced Nexus 4s and 5s so I can't see the Nexus 6 being an issue. They don't have a trademark for the use of nexus 6 either.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blade runner also referenced Nexus 4s and 5s so I can't see the Nexus 6 being an issue. They don't have a trademark for the use of nexus 6 either.

 

Make the Nexus 6 a "pleasure model," and it will not be an issue. In fact, it will be a huge hit among this crowd.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, if it's different in name only, I'm fine with no Nexus 6.  That said, I have a bad feeling that the low pricing will be out the window, at least for (near) top of the line hardware.  I'm just going to wait until more details come out regarding the Nexus and Android Silver.  To get too worked up before that isn't really worth the effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...