Jump to content

Network Vision and Spark EARFCN logging thread


Recommended Posts

 

I can send in spreadsheet form, not too many adds

 

Band 25

  • EARFCN 8640 (downlink) [10x10] [PCS C/G Blocks] [dkyeager 8/17/15 screenshot] 1990
  • EARFCN 26640 (uplink) [10x10] [PCS C/G Blocks] [dkyeager 8/17/15 screenshot] 1910

 

 

The first person to find 10x10 in the Columbus market was nowerlater on 8/3 http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4742-columbus-market-mapspreadsheet/page-193#entry434099.  It has also been found in the Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Seattle markets.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if Its possible For that area to see 10x10 then?

 

 

They would have to expand the second carrier to do that because I don't believe sprint has the PCS C5 block in Des Moines...

 

this is correct, we don't have anything next to the G block here so they would have to eat into the B block more to expand the 2nd B25 to a 10x10. would be nice though because we would then have a 10x10 and a 5x5, but i don't think they will be able to refarm that much CDMA/EVDO anytime soon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is correct, we don't have anything next to the G block here so they would have to eat into the B block more to expand the 2nd B25 to a 10x10. would be nice though because we would then have a 10x10 and a 5x5, but i don't think they will be able to refarm that much CDMA/EVDO anytime soon.

Yea probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is correct, we don't have anything next to the G block here so they would have to eat into the B block more to expand the 2nd B25 to a 10x10. would be nice though because we would then have a 10x10 and a 5x5, but i don't think they will be able to refarm that much CDMA/EVDO anytime soon.

Shows what I know. I thought they could just take the 2 5x5 and, make them one 10X10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shows what I know. I thought they could just take the 2 5x5 and, make them one 10X10.

 

The spectrum has to be contiguous to do that. The B block and G block are not aligned next to each other, so there is no way to combine them. That's why there are only limited markets with a 10x10 carrier right now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is the right place for this question, but I was wondering why TD-LTE carriers are 19.8mhz apart (198 difference in EARFCN) when they are 20mhz each.  Shouldn't the center frequencies be 20mhz apart (200 difference in EARFCN) to avoid interference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is the right place for this question, but I was wondering why TD-LTE carriers are 19.8mhz apart (198 difference in EARFCN) when they are 20mhz each.  Shouldn't the center frequencies be 20mhz apart (200 difference in EARFCN) to avoid interference?

 

Nope.  The subcarrier occupied bandwidth of an LTE carrier is 90 percent of its total bandwidth.  The other 10 percent is used for unoccupied internal guard bands.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boston Market B41 info (not an HTML expert, so apologies for the formatting):
Channel Name Paired/Unpaired Start Freq (MHz) Center Freq (MHz) Stop Freq (MHz) Guardband Bandwidth (MHz) Regulatory Channels Band Name Area Mode EARFCN (D/L) Downlink (MHz) EARFCN (U/L) Uplinnk (MHz)
L16 (CH1) UNPAIRED 2504.60 2513.60 2522.60 1 18 A1,A2,A3,B1 41 TD 2500 ALL TDD 39826 2513.60 39826 2513.60
L17 (CH2) UNPAIRED 2524.40 2533.40 2542.40 1 18 B1,B2,B3,C1,C2 41 TD 2500 ALL TDD 40024 2533.40 40024 2533.40
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Channel Name Paired/Unpaired Start Freq Center Freq Stop Freq Guardband Bandwidth Regulatory Channels Band Name Area Mode Earfcn DL Downlink (MHz) Earfcn UL Uplink (MHz) L16 (CH1) Unpaired 2,504.60 2,513.60 2,522.60 1 18 A1,A2,A3,B1 41 TD 2500 All TDD 39826 2513.6 39826 2513.6 L17 (CH2) Unpaired 2,524.40 2,533.40 2,542.40 1 18 B1,B2,B3,C1,C2 41 TD 2500 All TDD 40024 2533.4 40024 2533.4

 

I am unsure what you are posting, but this appears to be some sort of log output.

 

You have two 20 MHz TDD band 41 carriers:  the first centered at 2513.6 MHz as EARFCN 39826 and a second centered at 2533.4 MHz as EARFCN 40024.  Both of those are known.  The first already is in the list in the top post.  The second previously has been reported, though I have not gotten around to updating and adding it to the list.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick question - LTE and 1x800 can only be deployed if 1x800 is on channel 476, not 526, right?

We are hoping they deploy b26 3x3 in the 1x800 channel 526 area.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what would the EARFCN of the 3x3 carrier be?

 http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4825-columbus-market-mapspreadsheet-premier-edition/page-94&do=findComment&comment=452869

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PCS B DFW MTA (East Texas)

DL 8309

UL 26309

 

https://goo.gl/photos/PLLDjkcUUCFg1jYK8

 

Aj, I have seen this on about 4 different sites near I-30 from Sulphur Springs, TX to Mt. Pleasant, TX.

I believe that is used in Flint Michigan too

 

Sent from Moto X Pure via Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

620def9e989fbe46d6b2e8eb2087aa60.jpg
So I'm at work where I usually do not get LTE unless the wind blows just right and noticed I had a faint LTE signal.

Mind you I'm in an iPhone 6s Plus so this could be a mistake in the field test app but 8321 denotes a second band 25 carrier right?

 

BTW this is in central Kentucky.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by AppleFanBoy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

620def9e989fbe46d6b2e8eb2087aa60.jpg

So I'm at work where I usually do not get LTE unless the wind blows just right and noticed I had a faint LTE signal.

Mind you I'm in an iPhone 6s Plus so this could be a mistake in the field test app but 8321 denotes a second band 25 carrier right?

 

BTW this is in central Kentucky.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep that's a second carrier in the PCS B Block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep that's a second carrier in the PCS B Block.

Nice.

 

What is curious is that I'm now getting a consistent LTE signal now with this carrier throughout my entire building where before I would have to get close to a window to get a LTE signal.

 

We do have cellular repeaters throughout the building so maybe that has something to do with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...