Rawvega Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-use-bandwidth-aggregation-mimo-and-comp-handle-lte-traffic/2013-10-08 October 8, 2013 | By Phil Goldstein HOLLYWOOD BEACH, Fla.--Sprint (NYSE:S) CTO Stephen Bye said there is no "silver bullet" in terms of what the carrier and its peers are doing to architect their networks to handle increased mobile data. "We're going to have to push the envelope in every direction," he said during a keynote appearance here during the PCIA wireless infrastructure conference. He said that as Sprint continues to deploy its LTE network, it will turn to a variety of techniques to help it manage increasing data traffic. The comments are notable considering Sprint continues to offer unlimited data services, while its main rivals have switched to metered data pricing structures. Specifically, Bye said Sprint will use... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamMrFamous07 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I was getting ready to put this on here -____- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrell352 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 GREAT NEWS. Really makes me doubt 800 LTE is coming online by the end of this year though. If it does it would likely be Chicago, Baltimore and a few other cities but most of the country won't see this benefit until 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 GREAT NEWS. Really makes me doubt 800 LTE is coming online by the end of this year though. If it does it would likely be Chicago, Baltimore and a few other cities but most of the country won't see this benefit until 2014 This article also makes it sound like TD-LTE on 2600 will not be live until the end of the year. And it is live now on thousands of sites. Sprint is making sure to under promise and over deliver. A new strategy for them and very wise. Robert 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dave Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 They better start over delivering some G2s asap, then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJC1973 Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 This article also makes it sound like TD-LTE on 2600 will not be live until the end of the year. And it is live now on thousands of sites. Sprint is making sure to under promise and over deliver. A new strategy for them and very wise. Robert Its the Montgomery Scott doctrine... say it will take hours get it done in ten minutes... then you are known as the miracle worker lol 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avb Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 For those that are much more knowledgeable than me - will MIMO, bandwidth and carrier aggregation have an adverse impact on battery life? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryman101 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 For those that are much more knowledgeable than me - will MIMO, bandwidth and carrier aggregation have an adverse impact on battery life? I don't believe so, as I believe most of those technologies are implemented network-side. This is a pretty interesting read if you're interested in learning about that kind of thing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIMO Basically, I think this more or less means the antenna becomes "smart" in splitting up the spectrum it broadcasts on for more efficient data use. As for carrier aggregation, if anything that will probably improve battery life, as the phone will likely select the radio technologies that are best suited for its location. For example, if you're in a brick building connecting automatically to LTE 800 will be more power efficient than trying to maintain a weak LTE 1900 signal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 As for carrier aggregation, if anything that will probably improve battery life, as the phone will likely select the radio technologies that are best suited for its location. For example, if you're in a brick building connecting automatically to LTE 800 will be more power efficient than trying to maintain a weak LTE 1900 signal. No, what you are describing is band reselection. Carrier aggregation would combine together both LTE 1900 and LTE 800 carriers. AJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doakills Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 I'm really hopen this Nexus 5 D820 actually pans out to be true and blue for sprint bands. Tri-band and a nexus + top shelf specs. Sign me up! if not i'll most likely wait until next year when HTC / Samshit may introduce something. I really got my hopes high atm that the d820 is the real deal, so far the d821 manual seems to be more of a international version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnner1999 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 so maybe Sprint doesn't want tri-band phones out till they are closer to launching... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Dean Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 so maybe Sprint doesn't want tri-band phones out till they are closer to launching... That may be true. Falling back to Robert's statement of under promising then over delivering. I know Josh has been staying on top of new developments (thank you Josh) with tri-band phones. With our federal government in neutral, it will only further delay any new phones being tested and/or approved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afazel Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 There's nothing neutral about our federal government ;-) Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryman101 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 No, what you are describing is band reselection. Carrier aggregation would combine together both LTE 1900 and LTE 800 carriers. AJ Do you mean like using both bands at the same time? I am confuzzled what you mean by combining the carriers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Do you mean like using both bands at the same time? I am confuzzled what you mean by combining the carriers. Yes, that is exactly the nature of carrier aggregation. AJ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnner1999 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Do you mean like using both bands at the same time? I am confuzzled what you mean by combining the carriers. Could it be like how T-Mobile uses one band for download and another for up? Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk now Free Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Could it be like how T-Mobile uses one band for download and another for up? No, T-Mobile does not. AJ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnner1999 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 No, T-Mobile does not. AJ Sorry I always thought that was the case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Wireless_Services The AWS band uses microwave frequencies in two segments: from 1710 to 1755 MHz for uplink, and from 2110 to 2155 MHz for downlink Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Sorry I always thought that was the case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Wireless_Services The AWS band uses microwave frequencies in two segments: from 1710 to 1755 MHz for uplink, and from 2110 to 2155 MHz for downlink Right, that is the AWS-1 band, not bands. A single FDD band consists of both uplink and downlink. The frequency separation between the uplink and downlink is irrelevant. AJ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnner1999 Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Right, that is the AWS-1 band, not bands. A single FDD band consists of both uplink and downlink. The frequency separation between the uplink and downlink is irrelevant. AJ thanks! always good to re-learn a wronged "item", Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraydog Posted October 15, 2013 Share Posted October 15, 2013 Interesting watch with Sprint's CTO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.