Jump to content

Dish trying to stop Sprint from obtaining more spectrum


lvanders

Recommended Posts

Found some news from the FCC that dish is now trying to mingle in Sprints affairs again.  Sprint is to try and get the H block of 1900 spectrum in an auction on Jan 14th but dish is going to try and compete and make the spectrum more expensive like usual.  Anyone want to go blow up dish?  I sure do.  Here is a link to the article.  http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/09/16/dish-gives-sprint-another-hurdle/

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, first Dish must get the Lightsquared's spectrum, then apply to the FCC to redesignate 2000-2200MHz as supplemental downlink. All of those things will not happen before the auction.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, first Dish must get the Lightsquared's spectrum, then apply to the FCC to redesignate 2000-2200MHz as supplemental downlink. All of those things will not happen before the auction.

You never know...they are a bunch of weasels those dish people haha

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would they just expand on LTE coverage with H-Block, then?  What plans do they have if they obtain H-Block?

Yes thats exactly what they will do.  It will give them a 10x10 instead of 5x5 bandwidth which will increase our speeds :)  Its all just for more spectrum to help data speeds basically.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would they just expand on LTE coverage with H-Block, then?  What plans do they have if they obtain H-Block?

 

In the beginning they will have another contiguous 5x5 block for LTE. If Dish wins, and under the assumption that they redesignate 2000-2020MHz as downlink, they can have an assymetrical 25x5MHz LTE band.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes thats exactly what they will do.  It will give them a 10x10 instead of 5x5 bandwidth which will increase our speeds :)  Its all just for more spectrum to help data speeds basically.

 

PCS H has a few more power restrictions than PCS G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So sprint officials came out and said that they will gladly hand over the H block to dish and not attempt to make a bid for it if all dish representatives including Charlie Ergen take a few days in each state and allow people to line up and kick them in the crotch.  They also stated that there will be a "Fast Track" line for S4GRU members!!  This seems pretty legit.  Here is where it was blogged...

www.creedthoughts.gov.www/creedthoughts.  

 

I'm excited for this day!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The future of Sprint's network doesn't revolve around the H Block.  At this point, I'd like to see them make Charlie pay too much for it.  

1900 is still Sprints bread and butter frequency. There is not enough 800 mhz spectrum and 2500 even after being fully deployed will still have its inherent propagation flaws. If Sprint can increase its 1900 holdings then i think they should go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1900 is still Sprints bread and butter frequency. There is not enough 800 mhz spectrum and 2500 even after being fully deployed will still have its inherent propagation flaws. If Sprint can increase its 1900 holdings then i think they should go for it.

 

Completely agree. No way does Sprint allow other carriers to pick up licenses in the H block and I know Sprint will have a strong showing at Auction 96.  Sprint paid this money back in 2008 to move the BAS service from 1990 MHz to 2025 MHz so that they can free up all this spectrum for 4G use.  Sprint in a way has already put some eggs in this H block basket by paying to move the BAS service. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely agree. No way does Sprint allow other carriers to pick up licenses in the H block and I know Sprint will have a strong showing at Auction 96.  Sprint paid this money back in 2008 to move the BAS service from 1990 MHz to 2025 MHz so that they can free up all this spectrum for 4G use.  Sprint in a way has already put some eggs in this H block basket by paying to move the BAS service. 

Don't forget that if someone other than Sprint gets the H block they have to reimburse Sprint for helping to move it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget that if someone other than Sprint gets the H block they have to reimburse Sprint for helping to move it.

 

Yes.  The only way it makes sense is if Sprint can pick it up at a discount or non-inflated price.  With Dish sitting on billions and running out of time to actually put their assets to use, let them pay market value or more for the H Block.  Charlie will be nuzzling up to ATT or Sprint soon enough, begging for a deployment partner.

 

 This more than sums up the challenges of deploying and using the H block  http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4112-pcs-h-block-spectrum-discussion-was-draft-rules-for-h-block-auction-set-by-fcc/page-2?hl=+block%20+new%20+band

 

So if we have to have new site equipment and new devices to put the H block to use (and will NEVER see it deployed 10 x 10), would we rather Sprint pay too much for it or would we rather sprint pay too much for lower band spectrum in the coming years? 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

he should just stick to his snowy picture when it rains.   Or develop his own system with his own frequency

 

...so says "the cable guy."

 

:P

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.  The only way it makes sense is if Sprint can pick it up at a discount or non-inflated price.  With Dish sitting on billions and running out of time to actually put their assets to use, let them pay market value or more for the H Block.  Charlie will be nuzzling up to ATT or Sprint soon enough, begging for a deployment partner.

 

 This more than sums up the challenges of deploying and using the H block  http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4112-pcs-h-block-spectrum-discussion-was-draft-rules-for-h-block-auction-set-by-fcc/page-2?hl=+block%20+new%20+band

 

So if we have to have new site equipment and new devices to put the H block to use (and will NEVER see it deployed 10 x 10), would we rather Sprint pay too much for it or would we rather sprint pay too much for lower band spectrum in the coming years? 

According to that thread CA would allow current devices to continue operating on a the G block and new devices to operate on both g and h blocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to that thread CA would allow current devices to continue operating on a the G block and new devices to operate on both g and h blocks.

Yes, CA is the only way you can get the benefits of 10MHz without shutting down the people with Band 25 only devices from accessing the G block LTE carrier.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, CA is the only way you can get the benefits of 10MHz without shutting down the people with Band 25 only devices from accessing the G block LTE carrier.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 using Tapatalk

So would Sprint actually do this? I feel they should since there is a drop off in speed when leaving 2600 coverage and this would help their indoor speed and image against vzw and att. My two cents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be disappointed in Sprint at all for not winning the auction. All the new equipment they would need, lack of backward compatibility, only 5mhz FDD... I say save the money for the 600mhz auction and for more small cells at 2600mhz.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...