Jump to content

HTC One max [Tri-Band] (was "HTC "Phablet" aka "T6"")


themuffinman

Recommended Posts

I would expect this to be a different HTC device. While the dimensions are elusive in the FCC OET filing, this device does not seem to support 802.11ac, yet the HTC One does.

 

AJ

Could it be a HTC One mini? Where can we find the dimensions of this device?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not looking good.  It seems like the HTC One Max may only sport a Snapdragon S600.  While the S600 chip itself is not too shabby but the long wait for this phone really deserves the S800 chip especially when the S800 chip is now available and if it wants to truly compete with the Note 3.

 

http://www.gsmarena.com/new_htc_one_max_photos_confirm_screen_size_chipset-news-6816.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That stinks. This looked like the makings of a potentially awesome phone. But, in the world of high end and flagship caliber products, the simple rule of "don't take on the best unless you plan on being the best" absolutely applies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That stinks. This looked like the makings of a potentially awesome phone. But, in the world of high end and flagship caliber products, the simple rule of "don't take on the best unless you plan on being the best" absolutely applies.

 

I am more worried that the HTC One Max will be single band LTE than the Snapdragon 600.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am more worried that the HTC One Max will be single band LTE than the Snapdragon 600.

Both bother me. A product like this needs to meet the expectations of its customer base. The One is HTC's flagship. That means it represents the best of what HTC is. You pick it up and you can see the physical representation of HTC's capability, philosophy and commitment. The One Max is their entry into the highly premium phablet category. To come out with less than their best just shows poor commitment and execution both to their own image and to their customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both bother me. A product like this needs to meet the expectations of its customer base. The One is HTC's flagship. That means it represents the best of what HTC is. You pick it up and you can see the physical representation of HTC's capability, philosophy and commitment. The One Max is their entry into the highly premium phablet category. To come out with less than their best just shows poor commitment and execution both to their own image and to their customers.

 

Either way the HTC One Max looks to be off my list of smartphones I am considering now not only because of the uncertainty of triband LTE but the Snapdragon 600 is troublesome along with what looks like a lack of a S-pen feature. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either way the HTC One Max looks to be off my list of smartphones I am considering now not only because of the uncertainty of triband LTE but the Snapdragon 600 is troublesome along with what looks like a lack of a S-pen feature.

 

It's amazing how the lack of a pen feature makes any phablet feel neutered in a way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not looking good.  It seems like the HTC One Max may only sport a Snapdragon S600.  While the S600 chip itself is not too shabby but the long wait for this phone really deserves the S800 chip especially when the S800 chip is now available and if it wants to truly compete with the Note 3.

 

http://www.gsmarena.com/new_htc_one_max_photos_confirm_screen_size_chipset-news-6816.php

The thing is all these various leaks are coming from the same source and coming from the same chinese variant.  No mention of any other version at all, I am going to keep hope alive.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is all these various leaks are coming from the same source and coming from the same chinese variant.  No mention of any other version at all, I am going to keep hope alive.

That's exactly what I've been saying. They've all been from Weibo and all been the Chinese "variant". We don't know of the u terbational version yet. This device could still be S800 for those outside of China. And tri-band for Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's exactly what I've been saying. They've all been from Weibo and all been the Chinese "variant". We don't know of the u terbational version yet. This device could still be S800 for those outside of China. And tri-band for Sprint.

Hopefully its tri band sprint and HTC seems to have a good relationship so maybe sprint can convince them to include all their bands.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's amazing how the lack of a pen feature makes any phablet feel neutered in a way.

 

It is to me because with such a large screen and with note taking capability, I don't know about you but my finger is the worse pencil out there to take any notes on.  You can't write as neatly or as legible with your finger as you can with a pen.  Also if you look at what Samsung has done to add features to a S-pen, I can see why it can be useful.  Sure it may sound gimmicky but I still find it interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is to me because with such a large screen and with note taking capability, I don't know about you but my finger is the worse pencil out there to take any notes on.  You can't write as neatly or as legible with your finger as you can with a pen.  Also if you look at what Samsung has done to add features to a S-pen, I can see why it can be useful.  Sure it may sound gimmicky but I still find it interesting.

Do you know of any aftermarket styli that work well?  Or, if the Samsung s-pen will work on this, or say, the Mega?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know of any aftermarket styli that work well?  Or, if the Samsung s-pen will work on this, or say, the Mega?

 

No idea.  Can the S-pen work on any smartphone?  I thought the Note 3 had a touch sensitive type of display to allow for a S-pen to work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know of any aftermarket styli that work well?  Or, if the Samsung s-pen will work on this, or say, the Mega?

Of course with the s-pen samsung added additional functionality to it but any styli made for use on a capacitive screen will work just fine on whatever smartphone you're using as if it was your own finger.  I have used a few different ones and haven't had any issues with any of them at all. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course with the s-pen samsung added additional functionality to it but any styli made for use on a capacitive screen will work just fine on whatever smartphone you're using as if it was your own finger.  I have used a few different ones and haven't had any issues with any of them at all. 

Sweet. Thanks for the info, man. I was just thinking how sometimes it would be nice to have a real fine point like that found on the s-pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet. Thanks for the info, man. I was just thinking how sometimes it would be nice to have a real fine point like that found on the s-pen.

I feel the same way but its great to have that built in feature with the note compared to having to walk around with an additional piece of hardware.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really have no issue with the Snapdragon 600.  I think it will more than suffice.  At this point in NV, I think tri-band is a requirement for all my phones, though. 

 

I think for most of us on this forum the triband LTE is more important than whether it is a Snapdragon 800 or not.  I think if the HTC One Max turns out to be triband LTE but with a snapdragon 600, people will be disappointed but they will still buy it.  I mean the Snapdragon 600 chip is still not too shabby and should be relevant for the next 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be the bringer of bad news twice concerning triband LTE for phablets, but it seems an HTC device headed for Sprint passed through the FCC. I'm unsure if its the HTC One Max, but it

seems to run on Sprint's frequencies. The device specifically has 817.9 MHz to 823.1 MHz, which corresponds to Sprint's SMR holdings. Band Class 25 LTE is all that is included, in either 5 MHz or 10 MHz configurations. Along with that, we have CDMA on PCS and Cellular.

 

 

Source: https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=754006&fcc_id=NM80P4E100

This device seems to be the htc desire 601 or code name htc Zara

http://www.phonearena.com/news/HTC-Desire-601-with-Sprint-LTE-bands-visits-the-FCC_id47573

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...