Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Georgia Market (Warner Robins, Macon, I-75 Corridor))


fcp_dp

Recommended Posts

After further study I don't think it's the WiMax protection site they're working on...

Bummer. I was hoping this could be the first Huawei Protection Site swap out to 8T8R.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

LTE is being really flaky today in Macon and Warner Robins; not really sure what's going on but my Nexus 5 isn't staying on LTE more than a minute or two at a time before getting kicked to 1x800 + eHRPD. I can't even wedge it into LTE-only mode.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Signal was switched off and a guy was up in my neighborhood tower this morning apparently swapping out RRUs from RRUS11 to the RRUS31 - it was very foggy so it was hard to tell exactly what he was doing, and there was no way to get any pictures. His vehicle seemed to be a generic white Ford Transit - no Ericsson or NSN logos that I could see.

 

I was kind of hoping that it was a band 41 install, although I guess the RRUS31 swapouts have to happen first to keep the weight down.

 

Sent from my Nexus 9 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Sprint was a huge disappointment in Macon and Warner Robins. I visited family this past week and the weak network destroyed my battery. Band 26 is completely overloaded and my phone camped on that at all times along with just flipping back and forth between 3G or Band 26 and occasional Band 25. Band 26 was weak pretty much every where, so probably not optimized. First time I experienced 3G being the better option to go with and constantly had to hunt for free WiFi when out and about.

 

Given how big each of those cities are, it's very disappointing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's problem in Warner Robins at least is very localized... alas to the main commercial area at Watson and Houston Lake around the mall. Frankly they need to be on the Centerville water tower with the other carriers to fill in their coverage; a DAS in the mall wouldn't hurt either.

 

In Macon, on the other hand, the only places I ever have trouble are in the Macon Mall (which nobody goes to these days) and the basement of Just Tap'd.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's problem in Warner Robins at least is very localized... alas to the main commercial area at Watson and Houston Lake around the mall. Frankly they need to be on the Centerville water tower with the other carriers to fill in their coverage; a DAS in the mall wouldn't hurt either.

 

In Macon, on the other hand, the only places I ever have trouble are in the Macon Mall (which nobody goes to these days) and the basement of Just Tap'd.

Was at Walsh Honda and around that area, and I had to constantly toggle airplane mode to get LTE. Was weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Georgia is one of the first markets that will be rebanded to put voice and 2G/3G data on 800 SMR only, so speed improvements should be coming soon in areas that already have LTE. How rebanding will affect the remaining 3G-only GMO sites (mostly along I-16 with a smattering elsewhere) is unclear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Georgia is one of the first markets that will be rebanded to put voice and 2G/3G data on 800 SMR only, so speed improvements should be coming soon in areas that already have LTE. How rebanding will affect the remaining 3G-only GMO sites (mostly along I-16 with a smattering elsewhere) is unclear.

Where did you hear this?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Georgia is one of the first markets that will be rebanded to put voice and 2G/3G data on 800 SMR only, so speed improvements should be coming soon in areas that already have LTE. How rebanding will affect the remaining 3G-only GMO sites (mostly along I-16 with a smattering elsewhere) is unclear.

 

I think you are misunderstanding that email posted in another thread. It's not exactly clear, but what it means is devices that cannot be updated to the new PRL will be stuck using 800 CDMA only (if capable) after the spectrum swaps are made.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes a bit more sense, thanks. So is the reference to expanding LTE post-swap, presumably by adding more LTE carriers on 1900, inaccurate? (Georgia market so far is only running LTE on G block and 5x5 on SMR - even the Clearwire protection sites have never been switched to band 41 LTE).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes a bit more sense, thanks. So is the reference to expanding LTE post-swap, presumably by adding more LTE carriers on 1900, inaccurate? (Georgia market so far is only running LTE on G block and 5x5 on SMR - even the Clearwire protection sites have never been switched to band 41 LTE).

 

It is not inaccurate. They are swapping spectrum so that they will have a continuous block of spectrum immediately adjacent to the G Block, allowing them to expand to a 10x10 carrier. They will likely trim some EVDO and/or 1x carriers to make room for the additional 5 MHz FDD of LTE, but will continue to run some EVDO and 1x in PCS spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not inaccurate. They are swapping spectrum so that they will have a continuous block of spectrum immediately adjacent to the G Block, allowing them to expand to a 10x10 carrier. They will likely trim some EVDO and/or 1x carriers to make room for the additional 5 MHz FDD of LTE, but will continue to run some EVDO and 1x in PCS spectrum.

Why won't Sprint just come in with a 15x15 immediately where they can instead of 10x10 and a separate 5x5? Continuous blocks will always be a better solution than split. You think they would know this by now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why won't Sprint just come in with a 15x15 immediately where they can instead of 10x10 and a separate 5x5? Continuous blocks will always be a better solution than split. You think they would know this by now.

 

Unfortunately, you can't run a contiguous LTE carrier across PCS and 800, as that's impossible to do.  So 10x10 PCS C+G and 5x5 800 is likely to be the solution in the short- to mid-term.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why won't Sprint just come in with a 15x15 immediately where they can instead of 10x10 and a separate 5x5? Continuous blocks will always be a better solution than split. You think they would know this by now.

Right now Sprint's equipment cannot do 15x15 even where they have the spectrum to do it. In some areas all it will take is recertifying equipment, in others I believe it may take new RRUs.

 

The whole point of these spectrum swaps is to allow Sprint to have one contiguous PCA LTE carrier. They will not be deploying a 5x5 and a 10x10 both within PCS except in a very limited number of cases where they have spectrum to do that.

 

Sent from my LG G4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now Sprint's equipment cannot do 15x15 even where they have the spectrum to do it. In some areas all it will take is recertifying equipment, in others I believe it may take new RRUs.

 

The whole point of these spectrum swaps is to allow Sprint to have one contiguous PCA LTE carrier. They will not be deploying a 5x5 and a 10x10 both within PCS except in a very limited number of cases where they have spectrum to do that.

 

Sent from my LG G4

I thought ericsson equipment is capable of 15x15 PCS with the new ruus they have on newer towers?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought ericsson equipment is capable of 15x15 PCS with the new ruus they have on newer towers?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Yes but shutting down all PCS Cdma operations is a no.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but shutting down all PCS Cdma operations is a no.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Say in markets where they have 30mhz of c block and 10 of g block. Why cant they use all of c block for a 15x15 and keep g block for evdo?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say in markets where they have 30mhz of c block and 10 of g block. Why cant they use all of c block for a 15x15 and keep g block for evdo?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Sprint does not support band class 14 on its network.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint does not support band class 14 on its network.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

They could hehehe. So how would Sprint go about going beyond a 10x10 while still having PCS active? Or is 4x4 MIMO a more immediate solution?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could hehehe. So how would Sprint go about going beyond a 10x10 while still having PCS active? Or is 4x4 MIMO a more immediate solution?

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

If you want pay to replace the tens of millions of sprint Cdma devices to get a band class that basically no other carrier use on a dead end technology then feel free.

 

Nothing spectrum wise. Sprint have to keep some PCS cdma live for network usability reasons be it 10 or 20 MHz total of cdma carriers.

 

Band 25 performance can be improved by cell splitting via new macro and micro sites and high end MIMO schemes. Other than that they're stuck with what they have.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want pay to replace the tens of millions of sprint Cdma devices to get a band class that basically no other carrier use on a dead end technology then feel free.

 

Nothing spectrum wise. Sprint have to keep some PCS cdma live for network usability reasons be it 10 or 20 MHz total of cdma carriers.

 

Band 25 performance can be improved by cell splitting via new macro and micro sites and high end MIMO schemes. Other than that they're stuck with what they have.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

I was thinking of a method that does not require a site visit because in my opinion Sprint is just not as fast at deployment that involves site visits on a national level as other carriers.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Sprint seems to be ignoring smaller markets... I keep seeing tweets about how great the network is, and the awesome speeds... but I don't get nearly that kind of speed on my LG G5 in middle Georgia.

 

post-1656-0-17505400-1482469131_thumb.jpg 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint seems to be ignoring smaller markets... I keep seeing tweets about how great the network is, and the awesome speeds... but I don't get nearly that kind of speed on my LG G5 in middle Georgia.

 

Capture+_2016-12-22-23-46-00.jpg

They are ignoring alot of medium and smaller size markets. Even some major markets barely have band 41. In smaller markets its likely money and return on investments and in middle sized markets its likely money holding that back. Usually smaller markets best bet is almost always Verizon.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Connected to a B41 site near Auburn, Al which for some reason is in Georgia market. I have not heard of any B41 in the Georgia market so I guess I will leave it here.

 

gci pci tac dl_chan strongest_rsrp strongest_latitude strongest_longitude

[04545531] 300 8838 0 -102 32.747116 -85.280497

[04545532] 301 8838 0 -83 32.643587 -85.350309

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...