Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Tucson/Yuma Market


jasper7821

Recommended Posts

So is there anything sprint in the tower I took pics of. What is this talk of south county? Is that what its considered toward the proving ground past the foothills?

I can't answer about the tower (as I too asked about a tower).

But the Foothills is East county or just part ( Wellton, Tacna & Dateland is East County ).

South County is south of County 14/15th, Gadsden and San Luis are the " Cities" there....

YPG is more North County........

 

I hope this is helpful,

 

Lateck,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't answer about the tower (as I too asked about a tower).

But the Foothills is East county or just part ( Wellton, Tacna & Dateland is East County ).

South County is south of County 14/15th, Gadsden and San Luis are the " Cities" there....

YPG is more North County........

 

I hope this is helpful,

 

Lateck,

That's why I was confused when he was asking about South county.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been praying for LTE to start showing up in Tucson.  If just so I can stop having to get a notification on every post and stop monitoring this thread!!!  :)

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been praying for LTE to start showing up in Tucson. If just so I can stop having to get a notification on every post and stop monitoring this thread!!! :)

 

Robert

Lmfao.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh well. It's pretty standard for them to turn it on and off the first couple days. Hopefully newgrounds can drive around the area a bit. I can't randomly justify driving through that area and I'm leaving town Friday (go figure).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wooo! About time. I put the good news on our Facebook page. Lets hope they can get more than one site going here!

There should be 2+ as the guy above said he had lte by the u of a.. oh and btw I live right by there! :D

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There should be 2+ as the guy above said he had lte by the u of a.. oh and btw I live right by there! :D

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

Eh, there's one tower that can do both. See the site map thread in the sponsor section for my prediction.

(Actually there's more than one tower that can do both, but if it was the other one I should have seen LTE at work)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, there's one tower that can do both. See the site map thread in the sponsor section for my prediction.

(Actually there's more than one tower that can do both, but if it was the other one I should have seen LTE at work)

Really? We can both connect to the same tower for lte when were so far apart? Hes near u of a im by amphi hs :o

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.1 miles to Amphi and 1.5 miles to the UA "area".. very doable. Speeds over 10Mbps? Not likely, but connected and usable? Sure.

 

LTE will continue to connect to a lone available tower long after CDMA services switch to a closer site, assuming downtilt allows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...