Jump to content

Why does one phone have better reception than others? Whats the truth about bad reception from Sprint?

MelonSplitter
 Share

Recommended Posts

MelonSplitter Member Level: 1xRTT

MelonSplitter

Posted
Posted

I am having problems recieving calls on my S3 in areas I never had problems at with my HTC EVO. I sent my S3 back to Samsung hoping there was something wrong with it but it passed all functionality testing. In other words, there's nothing wrong with it. They also stated: Problem Solved, No PCS SERVICE. While my phone was being "repaired" I broke out my EVO and had recieved 100% of calls in the same areas that my S3 would not recieve them. I know I sound like a freakin broken record but whats the real truth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lynyrd65 Member Level: 4G WiMax

lynyrd65

Posted
Posted

I am having problems recieving calls on my S3 in areas I never had problems at with my HTC EVO. I sent my S3 back to Samsung hoping there was something wrong with it but it passed all functionality testing. In other words, there's nothing wrong with it. They also stated: Problem Solved, No PCS SERVICE. While my phone was being "repaired" I broke out my EVO and had recieved 100% of calls in the same areas that my S3 would not recieve them. I know I sound like a freakin broken record but whats the real truth?

Were you roaming? I hear some samsung phones like the Epic SGS1 won't roam onto PCS bands. Maybe you were in a PCS-only roaming area?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

I know I sound like a freakin broken record but whats the real truth?

 

You must be holding your phone wrong.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

The GS3 had equal or better radio performance to the EVO LTE in every way in our testing. And these findings seem to be supported by all the observations I have read and seen to date. The issue in the OP is an anomaly associated with this specific unit.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boosted20V Member Level: eHRPD

Boosted20V

Posted
Posted

The GS3 had equal or better radio performance to the EVO LTE in every way in our testing. And these findings seem to be supported by all the observations I have read and seen to date. The issue in the OP is an anomaly associated with this specific unit.

 

Robert

 

I thought he was talking original EVO 4G, not LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

I thought he was talking original EVO 4G, not LTE.

 

Thanks for the clarification. I missed that. However, in our 9 device testing, the GS3 was right up there with the best radio performers. Including the Motorola Photon.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pii100 Member Level: 3G EVDO

pii100

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the clarification. I missed that. However, in our 9 device testing, the GS3 was right up there with the best radio performers. Including the Motorola Photon.

 

Robert

Wait, you mean a company with its roots in radios makes good cellular telephones? Color me surprised!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GregSmoov Member Level: 1x Advanced

GregSmoov

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the clarification. I missed that. However, in our 9 device testing, the GS3 was right up there with the best radio performers. Including the Motorola Photon.

 

Robert

 

The Motorola Photon was the best performing Sprint phone I ever owned.

Too bad it was locked down and didn't have much dev support.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
koiulpoi Member Level: 4G WiMax

koiulpoi

Posted
Posted

The Motorola Photon was the best performing Sprint phone I ever owned.

Too bad it was locked down and didn't have much dev support.

I loved my MoPho when I had it. Ran CM9 on it since day 1 of ICS community support. It was an amazing phone; I could drive through areas marked as the fringe of "roaming" on the coverage map and still pull a 1X Sprint signal. Trust me, there's a lot of those around here. It was a marked difference going to the EVO LTE, I tell you what. We sold a decent number of them to people around here for just that very reason. I kinda regret that, looking back, as those people won't be able to take advantage of ESMR, and this area needs that extra coverage desperately.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MelonSplitter Member Level: 1xRTT

MelonSplitter

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the clarification. I missed that. However, in our 9 device testing, the GS3 was right up there with the best radio performers. Including the Motorola Photon.

 

Robert

I guess I am the only one in an area with the population of 212,013 who owns an S3 that is having this problem. My associate and I both use Sprint for our PCS service. Standing right next to him I can have him call me but my phone just stares at me with a blank screen. I then call him, no problem, I can make calls 100% of the time, and his EVO 4G lte lights up after 3 rings. This after Samsung has declared my phone to be 100% functional. I don't know what else to do. I think I'm gonna be sick. It's friday night. I'm gettin hammered. This sucks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
halcyoncmdr Member Level: eHRPD

halcyoncmdr

Posted
Posted

Go to a corporate-owned Sprint store and demand a white box/RF test.

 

Actually, the S3 might not be compatible with that test... let me know.

 

No LTE devices are supported by the RF tester in the retail locations. WiMax yes, LTE no. My assumption based on no facts whatsoever is that is because they use the same 1900MHz frequencies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
P_M_G Member Level: 3G EVDO

P_M_G

Posted
Posted

The GS3 had equal or better radio performance to the EVO LTE in every way in our testing. And these findings seem to be supported by all the observations I have read and seen to date. The issue in the OP is an anomaly associated with this specific unit.

 

Robert

 

Robert - can you link to the test results? I was waiting to see your testing but not sure where to find it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

Robert - can you link to the test results? I was waiting to see your testing but not sure where to find it!

 

The article is still on my To Do List. I'm buried and trying to dig out.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
P_M_G Member Level: 3G EVDO

P_M_G

Posted
Posted

Robert - can you link to the test results? I was waiting to see your testing but not sure where to find it!

The article is still on my To Do List. I'm buried and trying to dig out.

 

Robert

 

No problem - thought I missed it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koiulpoi Member Level: 4G WiMax

koiulpoi

Posted
Posted

No LTE devices are supported by the RF tester in the retail locations. WiMax yes, LTE no. My assumption based on no facts whatsoever is that is because they use the same 1900MHz frequencies.

No LTE devices at all? Are they not even supported for 1X and EVDO?

 

I have no idea how the RF tester works. Preferred Retailers don't get those around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
halcyoncmdr Member Level: eHRPD

halcyoncmdr

Posted
Posted

No LTE devices at all? Are they not even supported for 1X and EVDO?

 

I have no idea how the RF tester works. Preferred Retailers don't get those around here.

 

Nope, no LTE devices at all. We rely on the info in Service Trender to determine phone and network drops/blocks instead of an actual antenna RF test.

 

That is the only reason I am thinking it is related to the 1900 MHz LTE. It also only is capable of testing 850 cellular and 1900 pcs, not 800 SMR from what I can find here in the US. The actual tester is the NJZ-1800C for those that are curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rasta Cheesehead Member Level: 1xRTT

Rasta Cheesehead

Posted
Posted

I guess I am the only one in an area with the population of 212,013 who owns an S3 that is having this problem. My associate and I both use Sprint for our PCS service. Standing right next to him I can have him call me but my phone just stares at me with a blank screen. I then call him, no problem, I can make calls 100% of the time, and his EVO 4G lte lights up after 3 rings. This after Samsung has declared my phone to be 100% functional. I don't know what else to do. I think I'm gonna be sick. It's friday night. I'm gettin hammered. This sucks.

 

When your friend called your phone did it ring on his end the normal amount of rings 40 seconds for CDMA or did it go straight to voicemail? Are you using a custom ringtone or preload (out the box) tone?

 

I see you have a stock sg3, is it rooted? Software up to date? Any app like task killer memory managers? Have this phone been factory reset and used in the areas you have issues in without restoring your back up ( test with a clean device)?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SGT516 Member Level: 1x Advanced

SGT516

Posted
Posted

I don't know if anyone here remembers the old Sanyo (pre Kyrocera era) phones but I swear they had built in signal amplifiers.

 

I had an RL-4920 candy bar phone and while my wife's Samsung would be searching for a signal my trusty old Sanyo would just march on.

 

Even their flip phones were great.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
QWIKSTRIKE Member Level: 3G EVDO

QWIKSTRIKE

Posted
Posted

The GS3 had equal or better radio performance to the EVO LTE in every way in our testing. And these findings seem to be supported by all the observations I have read and seen to date. The issue in the OP is an anomaly associated with this specific unit.

 

Robert

 

I bought this phone over the Evo LTE because of signal strength. I tested it against my Photon, in strong and weak area's and found it on par, and always with in -1dbm in weak areas. n.v could be the cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • iansltx
      T-Mobile to acquire UScellular

      By iansltx · Posted

      A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • iansltx
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By iansltx · Posted

      Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • iansltx
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By iansltx · Posted

      Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • cooltech6597
      Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

      By cooltech6597 · Posted

      Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • JossMan
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By JossMan · Posted

      What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...