Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - San Diego Market


ferhusky

Recommended Posts

64 QAM 2x2 MIMO 20 MHz Config 2
3 x 112.5 = ~ 337.5 mbps
256 QAM 4x4 MIMO 20 MHz Config 2
3 x ( 112.5 x 1.33 ) ( 2 ) = 3 x ( 150 ) ( 2) = 3 x 300 = ~ 900 mbps aka gigabit class LTE. 
Hey Tim how many cell sites actually have 256 qam on it?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lilotimz said:

64 QAM 2x2 MIMO 20 MHz Config 2

3 x 112.5 = ~ 337.5 mbps

256 QAM 4x4 MIMO 20 MHz Config 2

3 x ( 112.5 x 1.33 ) ( 2 ) = 3 x ( 150 ) ( 2) = 3 x 300 = ~ 900 mbps aka gigabit class LTE. 

Seems like I hit the max on 64 QAM. I am on S10 Plus, will I see 256 QAM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like I hit the max on 64 QAM. I am on S10 Plus, will I see 256 QAM?
Yes if the SINR on the sector is very clean and your device and the eNB connects with 256 QAM.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I was pleasantly surprised with Sprint’s performance in my recent short trip to San Diego. Inside the airport is still terrible to ok but outside the airport and around Pacific Beach was very good. I was extremely disappointed with Verizons service in Pacific Beach. Severe congestion led to the inability to break 2Mbps down.

Here is a summary of my tests from this recent trip:

Sprint Average DL: 57.75Mbps

Verizon Average DL: 42.66Mbps

Sprint Average UL: 8.07Mbps

Verizon Average UL: 12.57Mbps

 

Verizon’s average speeds were bolstered by excellent performance at the airport. Sprint’s fastest download speed was 149Mbps while out and about in Pacific Beach. Verizon’s fastest download was 123Mbps inside the airport at gate 36. This isn’t exactly scientific as these were the averages of only 7 tests so take it as you will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was pleasantly surprised with Sprint’s performance in my recent short trip to San Diego. Inside the airport is still terrible to ok but outside the airport and around Pacific Beach was very good. I was extremely disappointed with Verizons service in Pacific Beach. Severe congestion led to the inability to break 2Mbps down.
Here is a summary of my tests from this recent trip:
Sprint Average DL: 57.75Mbps
Verizon Average DL: 42.66Mbps
Sprint Average UL: 8.07Mbps
Verizon Average UL: 12.57Mbps
 
Verizon’s average speeds were bolstered by excellent performance at the airport. Sprint’s fastest download speed was 149Mbps while out and about in Pacific Beach. Verizon’s fastest download was 123Mbps inside the airport at gate 36. This isn’t exactly scientific as these were the averages of only 7 tests so take it as you will. 
That area should have tons of B41 and I think 10x10+5x5 on B25. Sprint upload speeds would be better if they did 25+41+41+41 CA and not just 41+41+41

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tengen31 said:

That area should have tons of B41 and I think 10x10+5x5 on B25. Sprint upload speeds would be better if they did 25+41+41+41 CA and not just 41+41+41

The upload speeds weren’t terrible. They must’ve had upload CA enabled. I did see 31Mbps up on what must’ve been that newly widened 15x15 band 25. It was wonderful!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

That area should have tons of B41 and I think 10x10+5x5 on B25. Sprint upload speeds would be better if they did 25+41+41+41 CA and not just 41+41+41

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

San Diego has 15x15 L1900.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The upload speeds weren’t terrible. They must’ve had upload CA enabled. I did see 31Mbps up on what must’ve been that newly widened 15x15 band 25. It was wonderful!
Thats right I think Sprint has contiguous spectrum there. 20x20 which would allow for that 15x15

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

San Diego has 15x15 L1900.
 
Yep I forgot about that. Is there a 2nd carrier on top of that? Spectrum Omega shows that Sprint has the A,C and G block there. I know c and G are accurate

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Yep I forgot about that. Is there a 2nd carrier on top of that? Spectrum Omega shows that Sprint has the A,C and G block there. I know c and G are accurate

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

Nope. Just the 15x15 C4+C5+G carrier right now. 

Sprint doesn't own any PCS A block spectrum in San Diego. The A block is wholly owned by AT&T. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Just the 15x15 C4+C5+G carrier right now. 
Sprint doesn't own any PCS A block spectrum in San Diego. The A block is wholly owned by AT&T. 
Though so. TMobile has 15x15 B block.. att it's likely 20x20 and VZW IDK

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Though so. TMobile has 15x15 B block.. att it's likely 20x20 and VZW IDK

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

AT&T: 20x20 L1900 (PCS A+D, EARFCN 700)

Verizon: 10x10 L1900 (PCS E+F, EARFCN 1000)

T-Mobile: 10x10 L1900 (PCS B, EARFCN 850), 5x5 UMTS/HSPA

Sprint: 15x15 L1900 (PCS C+G, EARFCN 8615), 5x5 1x/EVDO

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Did some tests today since I haven't in awhile. Was waiting for my kid on 4th st in El Cajon, between granite hills HS and Montgomery Middle. Pleasently surprised. I wanted to hit 200 so bad, but figured I'd keep testing as a quasi stress test when the brats at the middle school is out at 2:30. I believe the antenna is at shadow mountain church, which is east and across the High School. 080a75507356914cc547c0d4ad2f6777.jpg86575e28dc285ef7d98324fe22aeb702.jpg489bb44d835a9635a081e89cd2b9d826.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

5a84b11aa9822ac2f3f91c3fbcec58e2.jpg
Got this in Carlsbad near the intersection of El Camino Real and Aviara Pkwy/Alga Rd on Band 41. This is easily the fastest download speed I've ever experienced on Sprint's network (I don't know this had to do with T-mobile since this was after the merger closed).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5a84b11aa9822ac2f3f91c3fbcec58e2.jpg
Got this in Carlsbad near the intersection of El Camino Real and Aviara Pkwy/Alga Rd on Band 41. This is easily the fastest download speed I've ever experienced on Sprint's network (I don't know this had to do with T-mobile since this was after the merger closed).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's possible that T-mobile is upgrading the backhaul finally. A lot of Sprint sites have backhaul capped around 150 Mbps to save money.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible that T-mobile is upgrading the backhaul finally. A lot of Sprint sites have backhaul capped around 150 Mbps to save money.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk


I didn't know Sprint had capped their backhaul to 150 Mbps download speed. That said at least for a smartphone, that's more than enough. But I won't say no what's nearly twice the download speed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I didn't know Sprint had capped their backhaul to 150 Mbps download speed. That said at least for a smartphone, that's more than enough. But I won't say no what's nearly twice the download speed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not all sites. But a lot of sites have that as the backhaul.

For a single device you're right, that's more than enough. But this is the bandwidth that's shared between all devices on the tower. I'm hoping on sites that are heavily utilized, that they have more backhaul. But from my own experience on a few sites that crawl during the day (under 1 Mbps during peak usage on b41), my suspicion is no.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

3a476a582fc6dc903c54be94b714c3ad.jpg
Looks like T-mobile has removed the 5 Mbps throttle on roaming. It showed up as native Sprint coverage inside the only Ralphs grocery store inside the City of Carlsbad. When I did the field test on my iPhone 7+ it showed up as Band 4. Previously I when I would walk inside this particular grocery store it would go down to 3G.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...