Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Indianapolis Market


omega

Recommended Posts

It almost looks like the larger panel on the second rack from the bottom might be NV, but I have been wrong before...

 

I'd put my money on the third rack. Tough to say without being able to see the RRUs, or the text on the bottom of the panel... lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I was right!

Maybe...

But probably not...

 

Sent via CleanROM DE using Tapatalk 2

 

I think you were! I misread your post initially.... I thought it just said second rack, not second from the bottom, which would be the same thing that I was saying.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I think you were! I misread your post initially.... I thought it just said second rack, not second from the bottom, which would be the same thing that I was saying.

I thought we were probably talking about the same thing... ;)

 

Sent via CleanROM DE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was beginning to wonder when some west side was going to show up.

It appears to be a fairly even distribution of sites at the moment.

6asedyqe.jpg

 

Every time I load the Sensorly map I get a little sad. So close to my house, but so far away.

yvevazab.jpg

 

Sent via CleanROM DE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was beginning to wonder when some west side was going to show up.

It appears to be a fairly even distribution of sites at the moment.

6asedyqe.jpg

 

Every time I load the Sensorly map I get a little sad. So close to my house, but so far away.

yvevazab.jpg

 

Sent via CleanROM DE using Tapatalk 2

 

If you look at Sensorly I mapped the spot on the South West side right by Washington St. There is a tower right at Kentucky and 465 then another at Washington St.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to map a bunch of the NW side this morning as well. It seemed the strength was strongest on Georgetown road between 86th and 71st streets.I saw readings in the high 60s and low 70s RSRP at that location but I couldn't tell which tower(s) were sending signals. the two strongest signal reading were on georgetown rd. just south of 86th street (74 RSRP) and Just south of 79th street (67 RSRP). I drove a grid surrounding this area circling out from there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to map a bunch of the NW side this morning as well. It seemed the strength was strongest on Georgetown road between 86th and 71st streets.I saw readings in the high 60s and low 70s RSRP at that location but I couldn't tell which tower(s) were sending signals. the two strongest signal reading were on georgetown rd. just south of 86th street (74 RSRP) and Just south of 79th street (67 RSRP). I drove a grid surrounding this area circling out from there.

 

With -67 RSRP you would pretty much have to be near the tower with line of sight to a panel. That is a -42 RSSI equivalence.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just reading this when I saw the 4g icon pop up. I am at work on pike plaza rd. i was getting -113 on rsrp. I added a dot onto sensorly. Not sure which tower I am getting it from I just doubt its from the one over at 79th and Georgetown that IndyAndy added.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that the one off of Willowbrook? Willow something?

 

Sent via CleanROM DE using Tapatalk 2

 

Not sure if there is a willow something near there. It is just south of IN 32, at the intersection of Oak and 171st (south St) between union and Carey (east of US 31).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not sure if there is a willow something near there. It is just south of IN 32, at the intersection of Oak and 171st (south St) between union and Carey (east of US 31).

Gotcha

 

Sent via CleanROM DE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...