Jump to content

Chicago and Boston LTE discoverable on Sept 21


Rasta Cheesehead

Recommended Posts

this is from this morning right near the cvs,, right in the neighborhood.

 

EVO-LUTION 4G LTE

Just went there with a friend's photon q and he was able to get LTE and I could not.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just went there with a friend's photon q and he was able to get LTE and I could not.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Ruh roh!

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where in the Boston area (both city and surrounding) have people successfully connected to a LTE tower? I am in the lower mills area bordering Milton and seem to only get decent 3G speeds.. i drive through the city everyday for work and never pick up an LTE signal... I also work at Somerville Hospital and don't get anything there but really slow 3G speeds... is something wrong with my phone or am I just not in the right area where there is a LTE tower?

 

I have a friend witha SGIII and he's getting LTE pretty consistently in Peabody. I'm in the Lawrence/Methuen/Haverhill area and I've never gotten an LTE signal, but have been seeing eHRPD for months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't actually do the tracking, but I haven't seen the person who did update this post yet, not sure if they even know about this website.

 

Anyway, I saw on sensorly just now that somebody has picked up a fairly large LTE signal in Norwood on route 1 right near the Walpole mall area on the East Walpole line. There is a Sprint store right around that area, which is a corporate store, so maybe they got a tower on their store turned on today.

 

Also the Franklin, Ma sprint store 456 West Central Street has an LTE tower at their store as of today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I suffered 2 years with that phone. Then someone bought it from me for $150... crazy.

 

Do the words "insufficient memory" throw you into a psychotic rage? My blood pressure went up 40 points just writing the words together. You must have the patience of a saint to still be using that phone.

 

I have about 7 app updates from the Play Store that I keep ignoring because I know it won't work. Fortunately I work from home most of the time so I don't have to use my phone THAT often.

 

Just waiting until I make a decision on what phone I want. Still leery of the Evo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Ruh roh!

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

After some good natured joking about his phone getting LTE I nearly grabbed the q in afit of blind rage and threw it on the ground...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any iPhone 5 users connect to LTE yet? Let's see some speedtest screenshots.

 

Shortly after I posted this I called a local sprint store and found out that my wife could do an Upgrade Now/Buy Up for $50 and then she was even able to get $52 back for her Evo Shift. Best of all they still had some in stock at 3pm. So my wife now has a Sprint iPhone 5. Driving back from the store she got LTE on Milwaukee Ave between 22 and Deerfield Rd. A speed test got 8.6down and 2.6up with a ping of 49ms. When we lost LTE the performance wasn't as good so I'm guessing the 3G sites near us don't have updated backhaul yet (.3down and .2up 150-200ms pings).

 

Now the real test will be if the dropped calls go down but that will take a couple of days to get a feel for.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sucks I can't connect to lte in Chicago. Anyone connecting to lte in the oak lawn, Bridgeview, Palos area.

 

I've been desperately checking in the oak lawn, evergreen park, Beverly, alsip, areas for a while. I get eHRPD but no LTE. I've been frantically checking the maps for new active towers but no dice. While the speeds in the south and suburban areas have improved marginally, no lte. BTW I work in the west loop and the speeds are HORRIBLE! Any where near Chicago and halsted is pointless. My phone is a paperweight at work with out wifi. But LTE IS COMING. That's all you have to keep telling yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I've been desperately checking in the oak lawn, evergreen park, Beverly, alsip, areas for a while. I get eHRPD but no LTE. I've been frantically checking the maps for new active towers but no dice. While the speeds in the south and suburban areas have improved marginally, no lte. BTW I work in the west loop and the speeds are HORRIBLE! Any where near Chicago and halsted is pointless. My phone is a paperweight at work with out wifi. But LTE IS COMING. That's all you have to keep telling yourself.

 

I get a Lte ConnectIon out In the matteson/ country club hIlls Area

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just went there with a friend's photon q and he was able to get LTE and I could not.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

today near the cvs in north Attleboro,, still strong in this one area.

 

EVO-LUTION 4G LTE

post-3641-13483128808337_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

today near the cvs in north Attleboro,, still strong in this one area.

 

EVO-LUTION 4G LTE

Ok now you're just bragging :P

I tried again this morning and nothing. Maybe I should have my phone looked at.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok now you're just bragging <img src='http://s4gru.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='<img src='http://s4gru.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':P' />' />

I tried again this morning and nothing. Maybe I should have my phone looked at.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

somethings is obviously wrong with your phone. I was testing and that area is the strongest signal,, full bars. Try doing a prl update.

 

EVO-LUTION 4G LTE

Edited by Zman1369
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still can't pick up LTE in Tewksbury... Was able to before during testing... Are all towers due to go online?
eventually...

 

~Stock 2.13 LTEvo Certified replacement with screen bleed... Second was worse, waiting for third replacement tomorrow... :o

 

P.S. Stock blows!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone in the New Lenox/Homer Glen/ Lockport area getting LTE yet?

 

Nope. I'm at Rt. 6 and Parker Rd, (unincorporated area, Marley/Mokena), zip, zero, nada. Went to Lemont this afternoon, nothing. Went to Menards on Bell in Homer, nada.

 

Hate to say it, but: meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

 

I'll be heading up to Oak Lawn for the evening, I'll give it a whirl. Ain't holding my breath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...