Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands Market


Gab2012

Recommended Posts

Ok. I wasn't totally sure if they could or not. The people making these claims they can also Claim their lieing about VOLTE fallback. Their most likely TMobile cheerleaders.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

VoLTE fallback?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VoLTE fallback?

On another forum people got heated with me when I said it doesn't fall back. They said that is a lie that Sprint can cause of 1x advanced where VZW doesn't have 1x advanced.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On another forum people got heated with me when I said it doesn't fall back. They said that is a lie that Sprint can cause of 1x advanced where VZW doesn't have 1x advanced.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

SRVCC from VoLTE to 1x was in the works but it proved unreliable (or so that's what I remember reading) and hard to perfect.

 

It is possible, but likely never happening as 1x's life cycle is coming to an end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On another forum people got heated with me when I said it doesn't fall back. They said that is a lie that Sprint can cause of 1x advanced where VZW doesn't have 1x advanced.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

SRVCC from VoLTE to 1x was in the works but it proved unreliable (or so that's what I remember reading) and hard to perfect.

 

It is possible, but likely never happening as 1x's life cycle is coming to an end.

I believe that protocol interfaces and procedures between the LTE MME and the CDMA S102 Interface were standardized a while back to allow for SRVCC between LTE and CDMA…

 

I'm pretty sure someone on here mentioned why Sprint did not end up deploying this solution but I can't remember...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I believe that protocol interfaces and procedures between the LTE MME and the CDMA S102 Interface were standardized a while back to allow for SRVCC between LTE and CDMA…

 

I'm pretty sure someone on here mentioned why Sprint did not end up deploying this solution but I can't remember...

I remember it had a lower than suitable success rate at handoffs. Implementing SVRCC today would just hurt Sprint's newly found strong suit (call reliability) that they worked so hard to achieve during NV.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is that sprint employers are aware of thr terrific LTE speeds. The other day i went to Sprint Store at Western Plaza and asked an employer about the terrific LTE speeds.. He suggested me to switch to 3G because 3G is more stable than LTE right now. Btw all of their display phones are on wifi Lol!!! Also, if you watch Sprint Puerto Rico's facebook there's alot of people arguing about the LTE speeds and demanding better speed.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is that sprint employers are aware of thr terrific LTE speeds. The other day i went to Sprint Store at Western Plaza and asked an employer about the terrific LTE speeds.. He suggested me to switch to 3G because 3G is more stable than LTE right now. Btw all of their display phones are on wifi Lol!!! Also, if you watch Sprint Puerto Rico's facebook there's alot of people arguing about the LTE speeds and demanding better speed.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

All carrier's usually put display phones on wifi not just Sprint. Once open mobile stuff is done things will improve.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At my home near the Aguada Coliseo Bo. guayabo lte B41(3) but slow speeds. Inside my home my phone revert to B25 but outside B41

I got B41 near "Rey's Cafe" and also for one second near Don Quijote.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it seems tmobile bought about 40 mhz of 600mhz spectrum for Puerto Rico. This is low band spectrum.

They bought enough to cover 100% of the country and Puerto Rico.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to upgrade to the s8 plus... But will wait a few months to see what Sprint brings to PR .

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

If you wait then the Note 8 will come out.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...