Jump to content

Network Vision 3G Improved?


Recommended Posts

I see the excitement and speeds that folks are seeing as LTE lights up in the initial launch markets. Since Network Vision was also supposed to have a positive effect on 3G coverage and especially speeds (due to backhaul improvements), has anyone been able to test the 3G coverage in Texas, Kansas or Georgia?

 

I know, once you go LTE, why would you care about EVDO... but it would still be interesting to see if NV has helped the 3G issues as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see the excitement and speeds that folks are seeing as LTE lights up in the initial launch markets. Since Network Vision was also supposed to have a positive effect on 3G coverage and especially speeds (due to backhaul improvements), has anyone been able to test the 3G coverage in Texas, Kansas or Georgia?

 

I know, once you go LTE, why would you care about EVDO... but it would still be interesting to see if NV has helped the 3G issues as well.

 

I think it might be a little tough to get a good gauge on that yet, since upgrades and testing is keeping these towers in a state of flux. From what I have seen in posts though, 3G has seen vast improvements. I don't know if it is just certain times, but I hope that it is permanent. I have seen quite a few posts of 1.5 to 2.5 mbps download speeds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People who have access to our Sponsor maps will see that there have not been a substantial drive for 3G improvements in Ericsson markets. Most of the 3G improvements have been focused on Samsung and AlcaLu so far. More 3G improvements coming in Ericsson areas soon.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

San Antonio is still experiencing sub 50kspeeds on 3g

 

And will be for awhile still.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to remind everyone...please do not turn this into a complaint thread. We don't allow pointless whining. Negative posts are only allowed when relevant to the conversation. Just putting that out there before things go South.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to remind everyone...please do not turn this into a complaint thread. We don't allow pointless whining. Negative posts are only allowed when relevant to the conversation. Just putting that out there before things go South.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

So we have to keep the comments above the mason Dixon line?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we have to keep the comments above the mason Dixon line?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

Sounds dirty when you say it. :P

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rockin all over DFW now. My tab gets almost 3mbps on a tower that has LTE. I get 18mbps+ LTE with my GS3.

 

Happy happy happy....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People who have access to our Sponsor maps will see that there have not been a substantial drive for 3G improvements in Ericsson markets. Most of the 3G improvements have been focused on Samsung and AlcaLu so far. More 3G improvements coming in Ericsson areas soon.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

 

Soooo.. in order to rush out iniital LTE markets, they did a Network Vision Lite in Ericsson areaa? Connect LTE at tower sites to backhaul, but not 3G? I thought that replacing all the equipment at a tower site would have benefits for both LTE and EVDO as that tower came online post Network Vision? Seems inefficient to have to go back and implement 3G improvements... unless all it involves is remote "software" upgrades or switching. Or did you mean that the issue is that individual towers are over capacity and the cell would have to be split?

Edited by sprinturg4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soooo.. in order to rush out iniital LTE markets, they did a Network Vision Lite in Ericsson areaa? Connect LTE at tower sites to backhaul, but not 3G? I thought that replacing all the equipment at a tower site would have benefits for both LTE and EVDO as that tower came online post Network Vision? Seems inefficient to have to go back and implement 3G improvements... unless all it involves is remote "software" upgrades or switching. Or did you mean that the issue is that individual towers are over capacity and the cell would have to be split?

 

No. What they did was continue to update the towers to NV even if backhaul wasn't ready and connected ONLY 3G to the existing backhaul. That is why there are some sites that are NV enabled but still not showing better speeds on 3G. When the backhaul is ready at a site that is already NV, they come back one more time and connect the equipment to the new backhaul and then 4G is enabled with 3G on the enhanced backhaul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. What they did was continue to update the towers to NV even if backhaul wasn't ready and connected ONLY 3G to the existing backhaul. That is why there are some sites that are NV enabled but still not showing better speeds on 3G. When the backhaul is ready at a site that is already NV, they come back one more time and connect the equipment to the new backhaul and then 4G is enabled with 3G on the enhanced backhaul.

 

So for a given NV site, if backhaul was ready, they implemented LTE and improved EVDO. If backhaul was not ready, they connected 3G to existing backhaul and left 4G off for the time being. Ok that makes sense. So if someone checks 3G at a tower where 4G is on, they should see a decent improvement in 3G as well. Thanks for the clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

So for a given NV site, if backhaul was ready, they implemented LTE and improved EVDO. If backhaul was not ready, they connected 3G to existing backhaul and left 4G off for the time being. Ok that makes sense. So if someone checks 3G at a tower where 4G is on, they should see a decent improvement in 3G as well. Thanks for the clarification.

 

Im not sure if what you have said is quite accurate. We now have LTE in San Antonio but our 3g is still atrocious. I have been told that the tower near my house is complete with 3g and LTE but Sprint has not signed off on the 3g as of yet. It was supposed to have been accepted last week but here I am with unusable 3g. I do believe there are other factors at play here. But we do have LTE in San Antonio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess (could be wrong) on the 3G side is that 3G is indeed connected to the new backhaul, but in many cases there now aren't enough 3G carriers to handle the load being placed on the tower (especially in a market like San Antonio, which may still be 25% Sprint). I believe NV allows additional CDMA carriers to be added quickly, easily and remotely, so as deployments cool down you may start seeing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just a guess but I would assume that they may have left the legacy connection connected for 3G but Sprint accepted the 4G LTE tower. Thus, you are getting 3G at the speed of the legacy network and 4 g via network vision and the legacy network hasn't been shut down and taken down off of the tower yet

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen on the sponsor maps, it looks like Ericsson is focusing on LTE since they have most of the initial launch markets. 3G is probably still on the old backhaul. I would guess in the very near future, Ericsson will get 3G moved over to the new backhaul.

 

I'm sure they have been pushing hard to get as many LTE towers done for the July 15th launch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess (could be wrong) on the 3G side is that 3G is indeed connected to the new backhaul, but in many cases there now aren't enough 3G carriers to handle the load being placed on the tower (especially in a market like San Antonio, which may still be 25% Sprint). I believe NV allows additional CDMA carriers to be added quickly, easily and remotely, so as deployments cool down you may start seeing that.

 

So under this scenario, whereas before the backhaul was blamed as the choke point, now it is not having enough spectrum allocated for data at a given cell tower? Yikes! If this were, this would be typical of Sprint. :(

 

However, since they are supposedly launching LTE in markets without every single tower upgraded, I would hope that at towers already upgraded and live with 4G, they would also have upgraded the EVDO side as well and have it live. As new towers come online to finish out the 4G footprint in a market with the remaining towers, the 3G would also get finished out. If not, again :(

 

Now, in spite of the above, I remember in the June update that there was a backlog of EVDO going live even at NV sites due to issues at switch center? If this is indeed still the issue, then it will be interesting to see how long before 3G gains the benefits of NV too!

Edited by sprinturg4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So under this scenario, whereas before the backhaul was blamed as the choke point, now it is not having enough spectrum allocated for data at a given cell tower? Yikes! If this were, this would be typical of Sprint. :(

 

However, since they are supposedly launching LTE in markets without every single tower upgraded, I would hope that at towers already upgraded and live with 4G, they would also have upgraded the EVDO side as well and have it live. As new towers come online to finish out the 4G footprint in a market with the remaining towers, the 3G would also get finished out. If not, again :(

 

Now, in spite of the above, I remember in the June update that there was a backlog of EVDO going live even at NV sites due to issues at switch center? If this is indeed still the issue, then it will be interesting to see how long before 3G gains the benefits of NV too!

 

I would say it's backhaul, not spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So under this scenario' date=' whereas before the backhaul was blamed as the choke point, now it is not having enough spectrum allocated for data at a given cell tower? Yikes! If this were, this would be typical of Sprint. :(

 

However, since they are supposedly launching LTE in markets without every single tower upgraded, I would hope that at towers already upgraded and live with 4G, they would also have upgraded the EVDO side as well and have it live. As new towers come online to finish out the 4G footprint in a market with the remaining towers, the 3G would also get finished out. If not, again :(

 

Now, in spite of the above, I remember in the June update that there was a backlog of EVDO going live even at NV sites due to issues at switch center? If this is indeed still the issue, then it will be interesting to see how long before 3G gains the benefits of NV too![/quote']

 

Carrier shortage strain has been a culprit of slow 3g, in addition to backhaul strain, since 3g started slowing down. Sprint has been adding 3g carriers to reduce strain in advance of network vision. The problem with the legacy network was that it was fed by t1 lines, so adding carriers could instantly cause backhaul strain. Network vision will allow Sprint to add carriers without worrying about backhaul. If they have available spectrum...

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...