Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

Looks like a 1900 RRU to me. Were they not there before? It looks like te legacy gear was taken down, but you would know better than I would when that happened.

They came down yesterday and today.  With the other RRU's going up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who have terrible service at home give a call at 855-752-2026 to see if you are eligible for a sprint airave device. I'm out at Herndon and 99 since 2010 and our service in that area has been and remains to be horrendous. When we called sprint wanting to cancel the offered us one of these mini in home towers that you set up to your broadband internet connection. It was free if cost and there is no monthly charge either. It provided some relief for us at home so I figured I share it for those who have not heard about it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who have terrible service at home give a call at 855-752-2026 to see if you are eligible for a sprint airave device. I'm out at Herndon and 99 since 2010 and our service in that area has been and remains to be horrendous. When we called sprint wanting to cancel the offered us one of these mini in home towers that you set up to your broadband internet connection. It was free if cost and there is no monthly charge either. It provided some relief for us at home so I figured I share it for those who have not heard about it.

unless you have wifi and wifi calling right? i mean .. that should be good enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like they put the covers back up on the flagpole 168 tower. I'd been wondering when that'd happen.

 

The shaw/Minnewawa tower has some reach. I'm pretty close to Bullard, but I've got two bars and -90ish signal level for LTE. Looks like that'll be enough until the rodeo gets going. Still not impressed with coverage around town - even traveling between two towers with LTE, but we'll see how that continues to go. At least we're not on 3g lol.

 

Sent using Sprint SmokeSignals™

Link to comment
Share on other sites

unless you have wifi and wifi calling right? i mean .. that should be good enough

well since the update for hangouts that gives you 100% FREE outgoing calls & Text while on wifi/3G/4G there not much need for the Airave anymore that also is a Great one here is a Video of how to get it if you don't already 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well got some interesting News from Sprint saying that Sprint will be rolling Spark here in Bakersfield by the end this year & the start of 2015 they are installing New NV hardware now so this should be real interesting to see how long it gets going even with my speeds going from 25mps down to .49 down 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job with the sensorly mapping in Fresno guys, its very clear what the tower ranges are from it

I've come to actually enjoy sensory mapping. I find myself driving randomly all over the place once I've turned it on, when I originally meant to go to the store at the end of the block and back home lol.

 

As far as the tower ranges, I've found that they vary quite a lot at this point. Some are actually sorta impressive. Some are pathetic. Hopefully it improves overall, but really, I'm just glad there's any LTE whatsoever. I was almost expecting to keep hearing 'next 90 days for your area' for another 3 years haha. I've actually seen noticeably improved 3g speeds too, though less of a concern now.

 

It's been great to finally see something after all this time! Definitely glad I stuck it out with Sprint - that T-Mobile ETF buyout deal was looking rather tempting for a bit there.

 

If Sprint keeps it up - their network improvements, their new cheaper plans, the rumored new OEMs they might carry, if they'll utilize their spectrum - they might end up headed toward the top of the heap, so to speak. Definitely can't complain at this point. Seeing improvement is long overdue and more than welcome.

 

Sorry for the novel guys (and girls) - just finally feeling optimistic about my loyalty to this company.

 

Sent using... wait, Sprint has LTE??

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like many sites gotten CDMA 800 accepted today. Soon B26? That will blow away T-Mobile in coverage. :D

Only in Fresno County and north will the LCV get LTE 800 until San Bernardino County gets their act together.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My money is on that one being one of, if not the last site in Fresno county to get LTE. I'm almost positive it's a GMO, and the permits to change that are a long ways out from even being issued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My money is on that one being one of, if not the last site in Fresno county to get LTE. I'm almost positive it's a GMO, and the permits to change that are a long ways out from even being issued.

 

And the Akers & Cypress site in Visalia is no longer a GMO if the update posted tonight is correct!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

found out that Bakersfield starts getting Spark March 1st so 5 months away & speeds so should get even better lets see if it happens when they say also my Speeds here in the South West Sux for download speeds no matter what time of day it is while my uploads are faster crazy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it's like the biggest Sprint tower :(

It's kinda funny if you think about it. The old site was a puny little site in a residential neighborhood that hardly cast a signal over the roof lines. Looked temporary. It's replacement is an old idea site that is a massive boomer.

 

Using Tapatalk on BlackBerry Z30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...