Jump to content

Never go the Sprint Facebook page; it is a dark place


cletus

Recommended Posts

OMGz, I get charged moniez for servicesz and so slow! WTF? omg! sprint sux, I hate sprint, I didn't payz billz and they callz and say no service and I am likez no pay for serviez I know get! RIGHTR!?>!?!/ OMGD!

 

Iz sayz to allz my frinedz thatz sprintz bad service too much no more for me. OMG 10 fee for "premium data" wtf with 500 slow data speedz. I go to tmob with greatz 4ghz speedz and much faster better more everyhting great I win sprint loose. I always win sprint loose loose loose. Their bad peepz and iz ha8rz them so more much then thay can think possible.

 

sprint go out of businnuz cuz i left them.

 

Ugh welcome to Mississippi. I live there, I can say that :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh welcome to Mississippi. I live there, I can say that :)

 

Kind of like we Sprint fans can insult stupid Sprint decisions, but as soon as a Verizon or AT&T Fan Boy show up and do it, we get all pissy? :lol:

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Kind of like we Sprint fans can insult stupid Sprint decisions, but as soon as a Verizon or AT&T Fan Boy show up and do it, we get all pissy?

 

Robert

 

Please don't think I'm an AT&T fan.

 

I just like their 4G LTE logo better. :lol:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please don't think I'm an AT&T fan.

 

I just like their 4G LTE logo better. :lol:

 

So far, I've enjoyed your posts. You call them like you see them, but giving every carrier a fair shake of your analysis. All is good. Carry on!

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please don't think I'm an AT&T fan.

 

I just like their 4G LTE logo better. :lol:

 

Yes, your profile pic is much better than mine.

 

Stupid Sprint needs to get their S@#$ together so I can have a nice profile pic that can compete with yours.

 

Verizon has thunderbolts

verizon-4g-lte.jpg?3995d3

 

AT&T has flames.

att-launches-4g-lte-11-markets.jpg

 

T-Mobile has a rice rocket.

304bb600284e02ef840616ae0b03b4bf.jpg

 

Sprint has a yellow font :td:

(as see in my profile pic)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, your profile pic is much better than mine.

 

Stupid Sprint needs to get their S@#$ together so I can have a nice profile pic that can compete with yours.

 

Verizon has thunderbolts

 

AT&T has flames.

 

T-Mobile has a rice rocket.

 

Sprint has a yellow font :td:

 

You don't find the yellow font mildly confrontational?

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't find the yellow font mildly confrontational?

 

Robert

 

Confrontational? Watch out or Sprint will PEE (Photon Epic Evo) on your shoes at the urinal. That's yellow...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Confrontational? Watch out or Sprint will PEE (Photon Epic Evo) on your shoes at the urinal. That's yellow...

 

Or maybe it's your face???

sprint_iphone_unlimited-4f9851c-intro.jpg

 

Sprint may not have a "cool" logo, but at least they know what's going on in the commercials of the other "unlimited" provider...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Kind of like we Sprint fans can insult stupid Sprint decisions' date=' but as soon as a Verizon or AT&T Fan Boy show up and do it, we get all pissy? :lol:

 

Robert[/quote']

 

Sort of... you can say whatever you like about mississippi - I actually dont care!

 

I actually wouldnt ever take up battle with a verizon follower.. the majority of them have rational reasoning of why they pay more. Its the other two who drive me nuts

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sort of... you can say whatever you like about mississippi - I actually dont care!

 

I actually wouldnt ever take up battle with a verizon follower.. the majority of them have rational reasoning of why they pay more. Its the other two who drive me nuts

 

I love Verizon! They give me excellent coverage on my sprint phone. You laugh...on my road trip in a few weeks I was checking cell coverage on Verizon's webpage. Not sprints :)

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I love Verizon! They give me excellent coverage on my sprint phone. You laugh...on my road trip in a few weeks I was checking cell coverage on Verizon's webpage. Not sprints :)

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

I know my friend , i know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a6fae39f-a3e8-8fdc.jpg

 

Why I pay more for Verizon, for now...

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

What is with that ping? Is that normal?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What is with that ping? Is that normal?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

It is literally in the middle of nowhere... Maybe the backhaul has high latency. Both speed tests I pulled from that tower were over 200 ms. Here is the other.

a6fae224-c8db-acf4.jpg

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get sucked into those forums. I swear my head is going to explode if I see another post about the $10 data fee coupled with something like "they chargin me fer four geeez and I ain't got no four geeez I'm gettin outs my contract"

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get sucked into those forums. I swear my head is going to explode if I see another post about the $10 data fee coupled with something like "they chargin me fer four geeez and I ain't got no four geeez I'm gettin outs my contract"

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

You said it... I can't believe people are still that ignorant of what the premium data charge is.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You said it... I can't believe people are still that ignorant of what the premium data charge is.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Apparantly, they always will be ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish sprint would just change their plans and make it included in the future. I also get tired of people constantly bringing up the 10 dollar premium data( smartphone ) fee. The service is still cheaper than AT&T and Verizon, and the same price as tmobile( 2gb plan with anymobile).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...