Jump to content

Sprint to buy spectrum, customers from USCC


bigsnake49

Recommended Posts

OVERLAND PARK, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sprint (NYSE: S) today announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement with U.S. Cellular (NYSE: USM) to acquire PCS spectrum and customers in parts of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri and Ohio including the Chicago and St. Louis markets for $480 million in cash and the assumption of certain liabilities. The additional spectrum will be used to supplement Sprint’s coverage in these areas as it continues to deploy its Network Vision upgrade and roll out 4G LTE nationally.

“This transaction will enable us to strengthen our business and become a more robust competitor”

“This transaction will enable us to strengthen our business and become a more robust competitor,” said Dan Hesse, Sprint’s CEO. “Acquiring this spectrum will significantly increase Sprint’s network capacity and improve the customer experience in several important Midwest markets including Chicago and St. Louis. We welcome the new customers in these markets and look forward to providing them with Sprint’s unique combination of unlimited plans, an iconic device portfolio and unmatched customer service.”

Under the terms of the agreement, Sprint will acquire 20 MHz of PCS spectrum in the 1900 MHz band in various Midwest markets including Chicago, South Bend, Ind. and Champaign, Ill. and 10 MHz of PCS spectrum in the St. Louis market. In addition, the transaction involves approximately 585,000 U.S. Cellular customers. U.S Cellular will continue its business operations outside of these markets following the closing.

 

http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20121107005545/en/Sprint-Acquire-Spectrum-Customers-Midwest-U.S.-Cellular

 

It's beginning boys and girls.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's beginning boys and girls.

 

Wow! :o Yes, indeed this is likely the precursor to something larger. Granted USCC is getting nearly half a billion dollars, but when you're a company that small that's already been losing postpaid subscribers for a while and you decide to sell well over half a million subscribers, including those where your headquarters is, things aren't looking good for your company imho.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! :o Yes, indeed this is likely the precursor to something larger. Granted USCC is getting nearly half a billion dollars, but when you're a company that small that's already been losing postpaid subscribers for a while and you decide to sell well over half a million subscribers, including those where your headquarters is, things aren't looking good for your company imho.

 

Don't be surprised if this is followed by a MetroPCS sale of PCS spectrum to Sprint so that Sprint does not make a competing bid to T-Mobile's.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suppose USC wasnt in the mood to sell the whole farm or sprint wants to wait out closure of the softbank transaction before tackling anything big. Im glad sprint went after spectrum it really needs now, as someone else could swoop in and try to snatch up USC in the meantime.

 

I think this shows aggressive prioritizing from sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint could use both the customers and the spectrum. While I was hoping for a bigger buy I hope this is only the beginning. 2.5 billion is still left so whats next

 

What do you mean by 2.5 billion still left?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the amount seem low to anyone? Even ignoring spectrum 480000000 divided by 585000 customers is only 820 bucks per postpaid customer. Sprints normal cpga (cost per gross add) has to be maybe 450 to 500(just a guess but I think that is close). So say 500 times 585000 is a cost of 292500000. That means sprint paid 187500000 for the spectrum. What does that equal for mhz cost per pop?

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint could use both the customers and the spectrum. While I was hoping for a bigger buy I hope this is only the beginning. 2.5 billion is still left so whats next

 

What do you mean by 2.5 billion still left?

 

I'm guessing he's referring to SoftBank's first initial cash infusion of $3 billion last month.

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=2436

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the other thread there was a question about rolling out 10x10 LTE carrier, I can't see Sprint doing that in the near future as some of their current LTE devices only support 5x5Mhz:

 

Galaxy Note 2

Galaxy Victory

Galaxy S3

 

I'm guessing there are more, I couldn't find a break down on the Viper, Nexus, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the other thread there was a question about rolling out 10x10 LTE carrier, I can't see Sprint doing that in the near future as some of their current LTE devices only support 5x5Mhz:

 

Galaxy Note 2

Galaxy Victory

Galaxy S3

 

I'm guessing there are more, I couldn't find a break down on the Viper, Nexus, etc

 

I think of all Sprint's LTE phones only the HTC Evo supports 10x10. Everything else is 5x5. I'm just spitting this out from memory though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think of all Sprint's LTE phones only the HTC Evo supports 10x10. Everything else is 5x5. I'm just spitting this out from memory though.

 

Wait, so they also have to build into the devices the ability to connect to bands that wide? I thought as long as a device supported the correct frequency and type of technology they should be able to connect without a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So one thing I'm not clear on. Will this deal expand Sprint's footprint in the midwest or is it just increasing it's spectrum depth in places it already provides service?

 

It will just increase the spectrum depth. It will do nothing for coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It will just increase the spectrum depth. It will do nothing for coverage.

The article says that certain obligations are included as well but does not state what those are. If us cellular has no more customers in that area then those obligations may be sprint taking over tower leases. But that is just a guess.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think of all Sprint's LTE phones only the HTC Evo supports 10x10. Everything else is 5x5. I'm just spitting this out from memory though.

 

iDevices supports wider carriers, so does the Photon Q.

 

Wait, so they also have to build into the devices the ability to connect to bands that wide? I thought as long as a device supported the correct frequency and type of technology they should be able to connect without a problem.

 

Yes, devices need to be able to communicate on the wider bands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quesion on this for a Note 2 user in STL will this effectively double the number of users that could get full speed data or would it require a new phone with another PCS band in it. Hope S4GRU will do s wall post on what it means to users in both 10 an 20 dandwidth areas.

 

Edit: also will the panels that were skeduled long ago to go into these areas fully suport all the new bandwidth or will we have to wait for another round of upgrades?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...