Jump to content

FCC Revokes Net Neutrality [WAS: FCC Approves Net Neutrality]


JThorson

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, RedSpark said:

A little levity (and some truth) here.

The Internet was fine before these rules. It’ll be fine after these rules are repealed. The FTC will take over to ensure fair competition.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/12/statement-acting-ftc-chairman-maureen-k-ohlhausen-fccs-approval

 

What a douchebag/Troll!!

Lawsuits incoming!

https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-schneiderman-i-will-sue-stop-illegal-rollback-net-neutrality

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nexgencpu said:

The Internet grew like hell before the last 2 years of “Net Neutrality” was enacted.

Why would the future now be any different?

If anything, the Internet will innovate through this line anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RedSpark said:

The Internet grew like hell before the last 2 years of “Net Neutrality” was enacted.

Why would the future now be any different?

If anything, the Internet will innovate through this line anything else.

Net Neutrality always lived undisclosed pre legislation. Title II just made it official and a hell of alot harder for ISP's to play games.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:

Net Neutrality always lived undisclosed pre legislation. Title II just made it official and a hell of alot harder for ISP's to play games.

A couple pieces for your consideration:

http://pinetreepolitics.bangordailynews.com/2017/11/29/relax-your-internet-will-be-just-fine/

https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/industry-voices-gillott-time-to-take-a-breath-and-chill-about-net-neutrality

Sprint offers HD Video with Unlimited Freedom at 1080P. And if you want to, now you can pay $10/Month per line for Ultra HD Video.

We all remember when Unlimited Freedom was rolled out with Mobile Optimized Video and it was a $20/Month Add-On for HD Video per line.

There was competition from other carriers with better plan pricing/features, and Sprint responded by including HD Video for free and matching the 10 GB Hotspot offered.

I don’t see this being any different. The FTC’s job is to ensure there’s enough competition for that to happen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple pieces for your consideration:
http://pinetreepolitics.bangordailynews.com/2017/11/29/relax-your-internet-will-be-just-fine/
https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/industry-voices-gillott-time-to-take-a-breath-and-chill-about-net-neutrality
Sprint offers HD Video with Unlimited Freedom at 1080P. And if you want to, now you can pay $10/Month per line for Ultra HD Video.
We all remember when Unlimited Freedom was rolled out with Mobile Optimized Video and it was a $20/Month Add-On for HD Video per line.
There was competition from other carriers with better plan pricing/features, and Sprint responded by including HD Video for free and matching the 10 GB Hotspot offered.
I don’t see this being any different. The FTC’s job is to ensure there’s enough competition for that to happen.



Many areas don’t have competition when it comes to wireline ISPs. So they will have no one to respond to.
  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

 

 


Many areas don’t have competition when it comes to wireline ISPs. So they will have no one to respond to.

 

 

Actions can be taken at the local level to improve competition in those markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actions can be taken at the local level to improve competition in those markets.


Yeah. Like that’s going to happen. Most of the local level governments are a part of the reason that most Americans don’t have multiple broadband options.
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

 


Yeah. Like that’s going to happen. Most of the local level governments are a part of the reason that most Americans don’t have multiple broadband options.

 

Vote.... or Run.

Support people that want to improve and expedite the permitting process for Cell Sites.

5G Fixed Wireless will happen.... and sooner with supportive office holders.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RedSpark said:

Actions can be taken at the local level to improve competition in those markets.

I don't think, that after so many years, that the local competition issue will ever be solved.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RedSpark said:

5G fixed wireless from wireless carriers.

That's different.  For me at least, I'm talking about wired competition.  

I know there will eventually be wireless home competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, clbowens said:

That's different.  For me at least, I'm talking about wired competition.  

I know there will eventually be wireless home competition.

I know.

For many however, the price and service will be just what they need... and there will be overlap.

And the best thing to do is reform the permitting process to enable this competition to happen sooner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, though said:

BINGO

Yup. 5G Fixed Wireless is ultimately where T-Mobile is going for its TV venture with Layer 3.

Comcast/Verizon will be cut out of the loop entirely, as you won’t need a wireline, and there’s your competition.

Perhaps Sprint will get in on this as well with its trove of 2.5 GHz spectrum.

Best thing to do is support local officials that want to expedite the permitting and it’ll all happen sooner.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. 5G Fixed Wireless is ultimately where T-Mobile is going for its TV venture with Layer 3.
Comcast/Verizon will be cut out of the loop entirely, as you won’t need a wireline, and there’s your competition.
Perhaps Sprint will get in on this as well with its trove of 2.5 GHz spectrum.
Best thing to do is support local officials that want to expedite the permitting and it’ll all happen sooner.


Haha. [emoji23] You have it all figured out. Only time will tell.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

 


Haha. emoji23.png You have it all figured out. Only time will tell.

 

It’s my best guess. B)

You can actually do this on Sprint now to a degree.

Sprint now offers an Unlimited Hotspot Data Plan for $50/Month.

Streaming is limited to 480P (it would be nice to have an HD Add-on) but this is passable.

If you want to show Comcast/Verizon and the others how you feel, close your wallet and walk away.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to show Comcast/Verizon and the others how you feel, close your wallet and walk away.


I have in the past and will in the future. I’m not loyal to any company. I would like to use any company I want. Unfortunately the way our ISPs are setup by region I can’t do that.

Only if other people in America boycott and start dropping some of these greedy corporations things will change a lot faster.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

 


I have in the past and will in the future. I’m not loyal to any company. I would like to use any company I want. Unfortunately the way our ISPs are setup by region I can’t do that.

Only if other people in America boycott and start dropping some of these greedy corporations things will change a lot faster.

 

Fixed 5G Wireless is the key to all this happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, though said:

In general I am against what the Oligopolies want, particularly, Facebook.

I hope that you have better critical thinking to offer than the above.  It is more or less analogous to the "Obama supported it, so I am opposed to it" attitude.

Net Neutrality is not a partisan, us vs them issue.  It has significant support across the aisle.  Those who are opposed to Net Neutrality tend to be few and fall into one or more of these camps: 

  • ISP entrenched interests who hope to maximize profits from anti neutral actions
  • anti government and/or free enterprise zealots who believe that the market inherently produces the best or deserved solutions
  • people who are ignorant of or have been misled about the actual tenets of Net Neutrality
  • comment spam bots

Lastly, characterizing Facebook, et al., as "the Oligopolies" comes across as mildly ironic, since the real concern of Net Neutrality is the oligopoly or even monopoly hold that ISPs have over so many home broadband consumers.

AJ

  • Like 8
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WiWavelength said:

I hope that you have better critical thinking to offer than the above.  It is more or less analogous to the "Obama supported it, so I am opposed to it" attitude.

Net Neutrality is not a partisan, us vs them issue.  It has significant support across the aisle.  Those who are opposed to Net Neutrality tend to be few and fall into one or more of these camps: 

  • ISP entrenched interests who hope to maximize profits from anti neutral actions
  • anti government and/or free enterprise zealots who believe that the market inherently produces the best or deserved solutions
  • people who are ignorant of or have been misled about the actual tenets of Net Neutrality
  • comment spam bots

Lastly, characterizing Facebook, et al., as "the Oligopolies" comes across as mildly ironic, since the real concern of Net Neutrality is the oligopoly or even monopoly hold that ISPs have over so many home broadband consumers.

AJ

You have your opinion sir, I have mine. I'll leave it at that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nexgencpu said:

Force feeding vs consumers making bad choices are not one and the same. At any given time the next "big thing" can happen organically (isn't Capitalism the American way?) and totally disrupt the industry. Good luck trusting ISP's choosing the winners and losers.

Why do you care that big content can use the government to rig the industry in their favor against big telecom? The market is more than capable of dealing with a two sided industry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, though said:

You have your opinion sir, I have mine. I'll leave it at that.

Well, not all opinions are created equal.  I supported mine.  You did not.  So, as it stands, your opinion is unsubstantiated and/or ignorant.

AJ

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, utiz4321 said:

Why do you care that big content can use the government to rig the industry in their favor against big telecom? The market is more than capable of dealing with a two sided industry. 

No, I, as the consumer do not want to be charged twice, once for the connection and another time for streaming or consuming content by my ISP. The content provider pays for the connection on their end and I pay for mine. I also do not want my ISP to use paid lanes to favor certain content over others.

Edited by bigsnake49
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...