Jump to content

Galaxy Note Edge (SMN915P)


z250kid

Recommended Posts

At this point, I've lost hope that there will be any 2x-CA devices this year. Sprint and the OEM's appear to be skipping that to go straight to 3x-CA via the SD 808/810 (w/ a Cat 6/7 modem) next year.

 

That headline is probably just another (silly) place to advertise how their new data buckets compare to the the duopoly's.

 

No.

 

The note 4 edge is the first cat 6 UE device that will take advantage of Sprints B41 2 B41 carrier CA (Carrier aggregation). We have a wall article on it that is in progress.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were some early rumors suggesting it would be $1000.  Which I baked at.

 

If the recipe and ingredients are good, I will bake at almost any price.  But, yes, I might "balk" at $1000.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the recipe and ingredients are good, I will bake at almost any price.  But, yes, I might "balk" at $1000.

 

;)

 

AJ

 

I am almost 100% certain I typed balked.  Because I didn't even do that from a smartphone or tablet.   :hmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am almost 100% certain I typed balked.  Because I didn't even do that from a smartphone or tablet.   :hmm:

 

I doubt it, but did you "get baked" before you typed that post?

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

 

The note 4 edge is the first cat 6 UE device that will take advantage of Sprints B41 2 B41 carrier CA (Carrier aggregation). We have a wall article on it that is in progress.

 

Excellent! In this case, I'm happy that I'm wrong. I look forward to reading the wall article.

 

I still think "double your high-speed data" was a poor way to word the headline, given all the marketing talk of having "double the data" of the competition. I didn't see the term "carrier aggregation" buried anywhere in that press release. It's understandably too technical a phrase to be in the headline itself, but should've been mentioned further in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt it, but did you "get baked" before you typed that post?

 

:P

 

AJ

 

No, sadly I was only half baked.  :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read an article this morning that stated the Note Edge was suppose to be curved on both side but Samsung eventually decided to only do one side.

 

Article also states that the upcoming S6 will have both sides curved.

I mentioned this elsewhere but i can see one side being curved but both sides?

Other than making those that are left handed happy, I think it would

1-make the main screen smaller (and probably a smaller battery as well)

2-I can see one side with controls, but both sides would probably be overkill with functions and apps.

3-Protecting the device would be a designers nightmare. Current cases for the Note Edge allow the side to be shown, if both sides were cured, how would you protect such a device?

 

Things that make you go hmmm.

Regardless I would probably buy such a beast. I'm a sucker for these things.

 

TS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

 

The note 4 edge is the first cat 6 UE device that will take advantage of Sprints B41 2 B41 carrier CA (Carrier aggregation). We have a wall article on it that is in progress.  

 

 

Will this work right now, with existing B41 sites, or are configuration changes needed on the network side to enable CA ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will this work right now, with existing B41 sites, or are configuration changes needed on the network side to enable CA ?

Well you need a second carrier to be present for it to work and most areas are operating one.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

 

The note 4 edge is the first cat 6 UE device that will take advantage of Sprints B41 2 B41 carrier CA (Carrier aggregation). We have a wall article on it that is in progress.  

Actually, looking back at Note 4 fillings, seems like that one also supports 20+20MHz CA on TDD. Now, whether it's enabled by Sprint's firmware I'm not sure. The hardware is Cat 6.

 

WKXvp7o.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, looking back at Note 4 fillings, seems like that one also supports 20+20MHz CA on TDD. Now, whether it's enabled by Sprint's firmware I'm not sure. The hardware is Cat 6.

No.

 

The sprint note 4 is a cat 4 ue device that utilizes a mdm9625 modem.

 

6QWfXnU.png

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

 

The sprint note 4 is a cat 4 ue device that utilizes a mdm9625 modem.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Is there a teardown available to confirm this? The FCC fillings confirm Cat 6 in two places. One under the UE Category, and two under the B41 CA combinations.

 

I also thought that ALL Tier 1 US variants are Cat 4, but after looking at all of them, only Sprint variant is clearly labeled as Cat 6. All other ones are labeled as Cat 4, with 10+10 being max aggregation combo.

 

*inconsistent screens removed*

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a teardown available to confirm this? The FCC fillings confirm Cat 6 in two places. One under the UE Category, and two under the B41 CA combinations.

 

I also thought that ALL Tier 1 US variants are Cat 4, but after looking at all of them, only Sprint variant is clearly labeled as Cat 6. All other ones are labeled as Cat 4, with 10+10 being max aggregation combo.

 

Sprint:

T-Mobile:

AT&T:

Verizon doesn't even have CA enabled:

 

 

See above. 

 

Sprints Galaxy Note 4 model is SMN910P. The 915P is the note edge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah thanks for pointing that out. My bad.

 

No problem. 

 

We were confused by the FCC docs stating it was a Cat 3 UE until we figured out that typos are common in the FCC docs and the Note 4 only comes in cat 4 or 6 flavor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem. 

 

We were confused by the FCC docs stating it was a Cat 3 UE until we figured out that typos are common in the FCC docs and the Note 4 only comes in cat 4 or 6 flavor. 

Yeah was just about to point out Cat 3 typo. Clearly it's a Cat 4 UE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still find it silly the Sprint note edge will have CAT6 CA but not the note 4. How do these things happen?

Someone wasn't paying attention to something, obviously.

 

And I mean lack of communication between Sprint and Samsung.

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still find it silly the Sprint note edge will have CAT6 CA but not the note 4. How do these things happen?

Different device cycles and development teams.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's disappointing that uplink CA is not supported at all. Given how quickly TDD LTE's uplink deteriorates at the cell edge, a doubling or tripling of speed there (i.e. 1-->3 Mbps) would I think be more noticeable to the everyday user (who is not running speedtests) than a tripling of the downlink, regardless of how cool it will be to see 200-250+ Mbps peak download speeds. Uplink CA would also be useful to have enabled for VoLTE, since voice traffic is symmetrical in nature. There will occasionally be areas around Clear-only sites, including WiMax protection sites where neither FDD LTE nor fallback to a decent 1x800 signal will be available. Those who have visited downtown Crystal Lake, IL know it is often such a spot.

 

They also misspelled eICIC.. hopefully (F)eICIC will be something next year's SD 808/810 devices and the network will support, along with at least 2-way uplink CA.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still find it silly the Sprint note edge will have CAT6 CA but not the note 4. How do these things happen?

It's all in the power of that extra screen :)

 

Yeah as a Note 4 owner this annoys me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd bet part of the reason is the limited run of Note Edges that will be created. To do cat 6, the Note Edge uses mdm9635 which Qualcomm currently probably can't ship in large numbers. The 9635 is made using a 20nm silicon fabrication processes where as the 9625 in the regular note, and the iPhone 6 is built on the older, more stable, more productive 28nm node. Basically, that Apple couldn't get Qualcomm to pump out the 9635 for them over the 9625 tells you how supply constrained the part is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...