Jump to content

iPhone 5 Facts/Rumors


legion125

Recommended Posts

Apple iPhone 5 to put the SGSIII to shame!!

 

http://phandroid.com...xy-s3-to-shame/

 

Pretty bold statement. Put the SGSIII to shame? In regards to what' date=' how many lives it took to build?[/quote']

 

Yeah foxconn shouldn't be talking at all. They need to be working on keeping their employees from another suicide strike

 

Sent from my CM9 Toro using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Apple has something hidden up their sleeves, the new iPhone will not be the wow that the 4 was. When the 4 released, it was a huge step up from the 3G/3GS. After that, we have seen a mid-cycle refresh, adding additional carriers and upgrading some specs, but keeping the same design.

 

This new iPhone, if the renders are correct, will be a larger version of the 4, perhaps leaving the glass back behind and going with a metal/plastic. It will introduce accessory fragmentation with a dock connector change, and will require the purchase of new chargers, or adapters, to work with the existing connector found everywhere today. This affects existing Apple owners more so than new customers such as myself.

 

Samsung took the GS2, streamlined the design, upgraded the hardware, and customized the software. This gave us the GS3, an evolution of the GS2. The jump from GS to GS2 was more revolutionary than the GS2 to GS3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Apple has something hidden up their sleeves, the new iPhone will not be the wow that the 4 was. When the 4 released, it was a huge step up from the 3G/3GS. After that, we have seen a mid-cycle refresh, adding additional carriers and upgrading some specs, but keeping the same design.

 

That's an interesting perspective. I have always felt that the 4s ended up with a higher 'wow' factor than the 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an interesting perspective. I have always felt that the 4s ended up with a higher 'wow' factor than the 4.

 

There was a lot of disappointment that it was physically the same, and that the main changes were internal. At least, that's what I read.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a lot of disappointment that it was physically the same, and that the main changes were internal. At least, that's what I read.

 

In my opinion, it was the faction of iFans who determine their social status by having the latest model of iPhone and in order for people to know that they had the 4S, they had to be using SIRI nonstop, that is time consuming. I'm sure they were hoping for an iPhone that actually attached to their eye so everyone would know that they are better than them http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaHUpWuqNHY

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, it was the faction of iFans who determine their social status by having the latest model of iPhone and in order for people to know that they had the 4S, they had to be using SIRI nonstop, that is time consuming. I'm sure they were hoping for an iPhone that actually attached to their eye so everyone would know that they are better than them

 

I agree, and they were the biggest complainers as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I was in a Radio Shack the other day and the store manager, who happens to be a friend of a friend, stated that the rumors for a September launch are pretty much reality because corporate told him pre-orders are supposed to start in late August. Hopefully this pans out to be true.

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, Apple is holding a special event on September 12, 2012. This is when they'll be announcing the new iPhone and possibly the rumored 7" iPad. If this will be anything like last years announcement, then the new iPhone will launch in October.

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, Apple is holding a special event on September 12, 2012. This is when they'll be announcing the new iPhone and possibly the rumored 7" iPad. If this will be anything like last years announcement, then the new iPhone will launch in October.

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner

that event is still a rumor until we hear the official announcement.

 

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that event is still a rumor until we hear the official announcement.

 

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

 

True... it is a rumor... but to me, if iMore posted this as the announcement date, and they claim it's from a reliable source... then I'm pretty confident this will be the date.

 

Also, looking back at last year, for some reason I thought the iPhone 4S announcement was in September with October launch... however, the event was in October with launch 2 weeks later. No clue what I was thinking there :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its pretty plausible. Apple is not happy watching Samsung eat its lunch because of LTE devices. I've heard quite a few people now switch to the GS3 from an iOS product because of LTE and few more considering it. Apple wants their LTE iPhone on the market as soon as it can. I wouldn't be surprised if this one is a little buggier than previous models.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apple just doesn't work that way and never will. They will release whatever they think is a good product when it is ready. They don't put nearly as much stock in the "business 101"-type decisions as people seem to think. Sometimes they won't enter a market even though they know there is demand because they don't know how to make something that is way better than the competition or is up to their quality standards (ex why no Apple television even though tons of people would buy it? Well what good is it if you are stuck with the same crappy DVR from the cable co? Or the same confusing mess of cables and receiver BS? They won't release a television until they can make one that is leaps and bounds above what you can do today. Then everyone will copy it and in 3-5 years people will say Apple never invents anything and how people are just iSheep, etc. Meanwhile I'll continue to clutch my AAPL stock, laughing maniacally at all you anti-Apple folk all the way to the bank)

 

 

I would also point out that Apple manufactures prototype devices all the time that never end up being sold for one reason or another, even going so far as to have Foxconn's prototype shop put in a limited production run.

 

They also do this with designs they absolutely know they will not be releasing to keep people guessing and keep the rumor mill going. They could have an entirely new design but put these believable plans out there to keep people off guard.

 

Or it could be the real deal.

 

Never trust the Apple rumors.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apple just doesn't work that way and never will. They will release whatever they think is a good product when it is ready. They don't put nearly as much stock in the "business 101"-type decisions as people seem to think. Sometimes they won't enter a market even though they know there is demand because they don't know how to make something that is way better than the competition or is up to their quality standards (ex why no Apple television even though tons of people would buy it? Well what good is it if you are stuck with the same crappy DVR from the cable co? Or the same confusing mess of cables and receiver BS? They won't release a television until they can make one that is leaps and bounds above what you can do today. Then everyone will copy it and in 3-5 years people will say Apple never invents anything and how people are just iSheep' date=' etc. Meanwhile I'll continue to clutch my AAPL stock, laughing maniacally at all you anti-Apple folk all the way to the bank)

 

I would also point out that Apple manufactures prototype devices all the time that never end up being sold for one reason or another, even going so far as to have Foxconn's prototype shop put in a limited production run.

 

They also do this with designs they absolutely know they will not be releasing to keep people guessing and keep the rumor mill going. They could have an entirely new design but put these believable plans out there to keep people off guard.

 

Or it could be the real deal.

 

Never trust the Apple rumors.[/quote']

 

What a great post to add to my pokedex! ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Not that it wasn't already expected, but WSJ is reporting jesusphone5 will support various world lte bands. Which could be really really good for clearwire/china tdd-lte

 

http://online.wsj.co...3902952754.html

Edited by dedub
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about starting with all of Sprint's bands and going from there?

 

Are you asking what bands the new iPhone will support Sprint wise?

 

For sure it will support 1900 PCS. As for 800 SMR and 1900 LTE... We shall see tomorrow. Let's hope for the best!

 

Sent from my JB iPhone 4S using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure the new iPhone definitely has LTE under the hood. This has been the worst kept secret in all of iPhone history, even more so than the lost iPhone 4 that Gizmodo got their hands on a couple years ago.

 

http://9to5mac.com/2012/09/12/new-images-of-iphone-5-logic-board-show-a6-and-lte-qualcomm-modem/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok someone like AJ or digi or whoever is gonna have to explain this marketing spin I just read about this device...

 

I guess one antenna for cdma/lte/wifi or gsm/lte/wifi? It seems Apple will manufacture different models for att, verizon, and sprint in order to use their differing lte bands.

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-att-and-sprint-will-get-different-versions-lte-iphone-5/2012-09-12

 

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) added LTE connectivity to its iconic iPhone for the first time, promising distinct versions of the gadget for Verizon Wireless (NYSE:VZ), AT&T Mobility (NYSE:T) and Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S).

Apple presumably will support the 700 MHz band classes used for LTE by Verizon and AT&T, as well as the 1900 MHz spectrum Sprint is using for LTE. Apple currenlty offers two versions of its LTE iPad, one for AT&T and one for Verizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...