Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Oregon/SW Washington (including Portland/Vancouver/Salem/Eugene/Medford)


JediFusion

Recommended Posts

Just noticed a massive 3g speed increase in Canby,OR. Went from .3 to 1.8 down just since Friday evening. Any word on when the towers here in this area are being upgraded or if there is work being performed. I can't even locate to towers to go check them out for myself. I believe there is 2 towers here and I have never gotten good speeds however it was very noticeable Friday evening to the point I had to run a speed test. Everything has been upgraded to hrpd if that makes any difference.

 

Thanks

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New to the site. Couple questions.

 

On Sensorly it shows LTE blips around 217/26 and Tualatin area. Are these reports confirmed LTE connections or is it possible they are phantom signals?

 

Why is it that sites being accepted cannot be public info? Is this S4GRU policy or something to do with Sprint?

 

How does S4GRU get a hold of these reports of new NV sites being accepted? (I haven't actually seen that these look like.)

 

Other then that, saw 3G speeds above 1 MB/s for the first time in Sherwood today! Too bad I don't live or work there. Last speed test I did at my work in Beaverton was .02 Download.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picked up a 4G signal today in between the Sherwood KFC and the BofA. I was at the light heading eastbound on Tualatin Sherwood road. It didn't last very long though. I would say just about up to Oregon St.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just noticed a massive 3g speed increase in Canby,OR. Went from .3 to 1.8 down just since Friday evening. Any word on when the towers here in this area are being upgraded or if there is work being performed. I can't even locate to towers to go check them out for myself. I believe there is 2 towers here and I have never gotten good speeds however it was very noticeable Friday evening to the point I had to run a speed test. Everything has been upgraded to hrpd if that makes any difference.

 

Thanks

James

 

Canby is a dead zone for me. Service absolutely sucks. I don't know where, but near the panda express it's crappy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Canby is a dead zone for me. Service absolutely sucks. I don't know where, but near the panda express it's crappy

 

I am up by the 7-11 and my speeds have greatly increased and they seem to get better ever day now

 

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just noticed a massive 3g speed increase in Canby,OR. Went from .3 to 1.8 down just since Friday evening. Any word on when the towers here in this area are being upgraded or if there is work being performed. I can't even locate to towers to go check them out for myself. I believe there is 2 towers here and I have never gotten good speeds however it was very noticeable Friday evening to the point I had to run a speed test. Everything has been upgraded to hrpd if that makes any difference.

 

Thanks

James

 

Work is being performed all over the market. The order is primarily dictated by the availability of backhaul, as sites where backhaul is ready receive NV upgrades first. The 3G speed increase you are seeing is a very good sign. Sounds to me like the backhaul vendors may have finished, paving the way for the upgrades to proceed.

 

eHRPD isn't as good of a sign as the enhanced 3G speeds, as it is basically the same as 3G EVDO-A. Many markets have seen eHRPD well before any LTE signal has appeared. More on eHRPD here.

 

I highly recommend becoming a Sponsor, as doing so will give you access to info we can't post in this public thread, such as a map with all towers in the Oregon/SW Washington market and discussion (and pics!) from those of us who are visiting sites and mapping on Sensorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New to the site. Couple questions.

 

On Sensorly it shows LTE blips around 217/26 and Tualatin area. Are these reports confirmed LTE connections or is it possible they are phantom signals?

 

First off, :welc:

 

I'm the one who mapped the Sensorly blips on 26/217. Each time, I was connected to LTE according to a the signal apps I use and my phone's LTE Engineering screen. The problem with these signals is that they are very weak (probably from a site fairly far away). We haven't nailed down which tower(s) those signals are coming from, as many sites in the area are being worked on. Tualatin has a site that was accepted by Sprint as 4G complete and is currently broadcasting LTE.

 

EDIT: Just realized that I goofed...the accepted site is in Tigard (off Durham Rd.), not Tualatin.

 

Why is it that sites being accepted cannot be public info? Is this S4GRU policy or something to do with Sprint?

 

This is an S4GRU policy. This site is not affiliated with Sprint in any way.

 

How does S4GRU get a hold of these reports of new NV sites being accepted? (I haven't actually seen that these look like.)

 

Can't say much on this, except that the data comes directly from Sprint (which is about all I know anyway) and is highly accurate. I do recommend becoming a Sponsor, as there is a ton more information available in the Sponsor section.

Edited by PDXmike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one won't pay a 100$ to be a sponsor on any site that does not put profit back into my pocket especially since the info will be posted somewhere within a matter of days.

 

James

 

That's nice. Donations are used to keep the site running and not a payment for services. $100 in donations is just for the Premier Sponsorship level. Any donation amount provides standard Sponsor status for 6 months.

 

Most of the information in the Sponsor section and Premier Sponsor section is not available publicly anywhere and never will. I suppose complete LTE site info eventually finds its way to public forums or Sensorly. However, the ability to know where each site is right away when they are inspected and the ability to know about many of the sites In Progress are invaluable.

 

Also, our information comes direct from Sprint sources, and not a post from some pimple faced 15 year old who says he saw LTE appear briefly on his iPhone in suburban Omaha. Of course, the choice of what to do with your money is yours.

 

S4GRU is a site by wireless enthusiasts who track Network Vision deployment. If sponsorship is not for you, it's OK. We have public content for those who just want to peruse those sections. Thanks for stopping by.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That's nice. Donations are used to keep the site running and not a payment for services. $100 in donations is just for the Premier Sponsorship level. Any donation amount provides standard Sponsor status for 6 months.

 

Most of the information in the Sponsor section and Premier Sponsor section is not available publicly anywhere and never will. I suppose complete LTE site info eventually finds its way to public forums or Sensorly. However, the ability to know where each site is right away when they are inspected and the ability to know about many of the sites In Progress are invaluable.

 

Also, our information comes direct from Sprint sources, and not a post from some pimple faced 15 year old who says he saw LTE appear briefly on his iPhone in suburban Omaha. Of course, the choice of what to do with your money is yours.

 

S4GRU is a site by wireless enthusiasts who track Network Vision deployment. If sponsorship is not for you, it's OK. We have public content for those who just want to peruse those sections. Thanks for stopping by.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

 

Making a donation is OK. When I read the sponsorship info it stated 100$ which is a lot. Might want to make it a bit more clear in your sponsorship information.

 

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Making a donation is OK. When I read the sponsorship info it stated 100$ which is a lot. Might want to make it a bit more clear in your sponsorship information.

 

James

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1195-information-about-s4gru-sponsorship-levels-and-how-to-become-a-sponsor/

 

In my mind it is clear. If you have any suggestions on how to phrase it, I'm open to it. It is definitely something we need to be clear.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://s4gru.com/ind...come-a-sponsor/

 

S4GRU Sponsor.For members who donate money through PayPal to S4GRU to help fund the costs of Sprint 4G Rollout Updates, you get the S4GRU Sponsor title for six months from your last donation. Once you donate $100 or more in total, you get the title forever and upgraded to Premier Sponsor.

 

Seems pretty clear to me. This has to be the first time I've seen anyone say anything about it. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Making a donation is OK. When I read the sponsorship info it stated 100$ which is a lot. Might want to make it a bit more clear in your sponsorship information.

 

James

 

$100 gets you the Premier sponsor content. But, if I read it right, you can make smaller donations, until they accumulate $100. Each donation gets you gets you 6 months if Sponsor level content. And, once you accrue $100, you get that content for life.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest 503ducati

I can confirm the LTE tower near SW 87TH AVE CANYON ROAD is active as of 2/20/2012. Smokin' fast. Hwy 26 is a dead zone from 217 into the tunnel. Check the screenshot.

I wonder if Sprint will be co-locating with Clearwire? Back in 2009 - 2010 Clearwire added more sites through there, traveling eastbound you can see them on the right starting at the Sylvan Exit all the way down to the tunnel.

 

 

28ugz4.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that is an interesting thought. I know they have been working on "some" tower at the bottom of HWY 26 near the tunnel for months, but I can't confirm if it is Sprint tower. I am on the edge of 217/26 around cedar hills and the 4G Clearwire coverage always sucked for me. Maybe one bar outside. Let's hope they move them to LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was out shopping at Albertson's (around 185th and Farmington) in the Aloha area. Noticed my 4G indicator come on. That was an unexpected surprise. Just checkled Sensorly. It says that Sprint is working its way down from Tanasbourne to along 185th and TV hwy, Aloha HS, Mt View middle school area.

 

Didn't do a speed test.

Edited by linhpham2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picked up an LTE signal on the way home from work today in Hillsboro. Ran a couple speedtests but didn't take any screenshots. Best speeds I saw were 25down 4up. I was at Cornelius Pass and 26. I could get signal all the way down cornell from the hillsboro airport as well.

 

Edited by foornath
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is Olympia considered part of SW WA under NV? Those of us who live in West WA consider it part of the Puget Sound/West WA. Centralia/south of Tumwater (Olympia area) is more commonly known as the beginning of SW WA. Just asking, want to know where I should look for info on that area.

Edited by RP88
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On another note, I see Longview is starting to appear on Sensorly. Down in Oregon (also of interest to me) I see Albany is getting some NV 4G Love now, any word on Corvallis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I've now seen how things work in Kobe, Hiroshima, and Osaka, as well as some areas south of Osaka (e.g. Wakayama, Kinokawa), and tried three more SIMs. The two physical SIMs (different branding for each) both use IIJ, which provides a Japanese IP address/routing on NTT, aleit LTE-only, so latency is ~45ms to Tokyo. The catch with NTT is that it uses two frequency bands (B42/3500 MHz LTE, n79/4900 MHz NR) that you're not going to get on an Android sold in the US, and I'm guessing that B42 would be helpful speed-wise on that network, as it doesn't have B41. I also found one place that doesn't have cell service: a vending machine in the back of the Osaka Castle tower. Or, rather, the B8/18/19 signal is weak enough there to be unusable. Going back to 5G for a moment, I saw a fair amount of Softbank n257 in Hiroshima, as well as in some train stations between Osaka and Kobe. 4x100 MHz bandwidth, anchored by B1/3/8, with speeds sometimes exceeding 400 Mbps on the US Mobile roaming eSIM. Not quite the speeds I've seen on mmW in the States, but I've probably been on mmW for more time over the past few days than I have in the US over the past year, so I'll take it. My fastest speed test was actually on SoftBank n77 though, with 100 MHz of that plus 10x10 B8 hitting ~700 Mbps down and ~80 Mbps up with ~100ms latency...on the roaming eSIM...on the 4th floor of the hotel near Shin-Kobe station. Guessing B8 was a DAS or small cell based on signal levels, and the n77 might have been (or was just a less-used sector of the site serving the train station). I'm now 99% sure that all three providers are running DSS on band 28, and I've seen 10x10 on similar frequencies from both NTT and SoftBank IIRC, on both LTE and 5G. I also picked up one more eSIM: my1010, which is different from 1010/csl used by US Mobile's eSIM unfortunately, as it's LTE-only. On the bright side, it's cheap (10GB/7 days is like $11, and 20GB for the same period would be around $15), and can use both KDDI and SoftBank LTE. It also egresses from Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom), though latency isn't really any better than the Singapore based eSIMs. Tomorrow will include the most rural part of our journey, so we'll see how networks hold up there, and from tomorrow night on we'll be in Tokyo, so any further reports after that will be Tokyo-centric.
    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...