Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Memphis Market


dmaxx67

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 8 months later...

Disregard last message. Downloaded signalcheck and im getting 800. I jyst dont thibk they have been tuned yet. Im only seeing around -95 at house and work in building

 

Sent from my Optimus G using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Hello! I tried Sprint out last year and recently tried it out again. There's B26 all over the Germantown area, by the river, Mud Island, from Memphis to Brownsville TN and Jackson TN. Coverage has greatly increased compared to last year. It was good enough that I decided to port my main and secondary lines over to Sprint. We didn't get 4G around Gallaway TN or most of 70/79 from Memphis to Jackson, but we usually don't drive that route anyway. I40 from Memphis to Jackson has 4g about 90% of the way now. To my surprise, the 4G is solid in Brownsville TN with B25 and B26 both being pretty strong. Millington is somewhat spotty, but usable.

 

BTW, I have not seen B41 anywhere yet.

 

Hope this helps!

:-)

Edited by hectorartm
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I've been mulling over buying a Sprint iPhone 6 to get unlimited data (I'm using Gophone atm on an iPhone 5).  One of my biggest concerns was their lack of low frequency bands for building penetration.  Looking over the Site Acceptance Reports I see Memphis is listed as have something like 240 B26 800Mhz LTE and 270 CDMA 800Mhz.  What exactly does "Site Acceptance" mean; something they've already upgraded or just plan to in the future?  I'm currently in Olive Branch right at the edge of Memphis on HWY 78 (about 2 miles south of the Nike plant on Tuggle).  

 

I'm really wanting unlimited data and my only options are Sprint and T-mobile.  T-mobile coverage has waaay to much 2g or just plain nothing coverage around here for me to use.  Plus BNSF has a 20% discount with Sprint.  Sprint seems like it's taken a beating over the years but they appear to be making a strong effort to get back in the game.  I'm not one of those speed test junkies that require 50mb downloads; 5mb or higher is fine for what I want to do.  

 

Happy new year fellow Memphians!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With those types of expectations, it sounds like your be very happy with Sprint in the Memphis market. They have a lot of B26 (800) LTE coverage. They are lacking a lot of B41, which brings the speed. That will come in time, though.

 

Using Nexus 5 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Here my direct comparison to tmo (just switched a few lines back to Sprint). T-Mobile is simply faster and seems to have better indoor coverage. I'm attributing this to cell density. Anyway, Sprint is still a bit too slow in some areas, but I saw B41 all over the wolfchase mall area, on the 40 going towards to 240 and down from the mall to Shelby Park Dog Park area. So there's definitely some upgrades being done. Germantown by Hacks and Poplar Pike now has B26 and is fully covered. Everything by the golf course and Fieldstone apartments still stinks bad. Driving to Collierville from Winchester/Hacks Cross is now fully covered with B26 (before only B25). So there's definitely activity in the last few months, but still they have a long way to go. The consistency is nowhere near tmo yet. I'm confident they will get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Sprint leases 700 MHz A-block spectrum from C-Spire in addition to PCS spectrum

 

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/ApplicationSearch/applAdminAttachments.jsp?applID=9191702#

 

That is all of C Spire's licensed spectrum in the Memphis market.  Additionally, the leases are long term, de facto transfer, signaling that this likely precedes an actual transfer of licenses.  In layman's terms, C Spire almost certainly is exiting the Memphis market.  Much like USCC in St. Louis, that urban coverage expansion has not worked out, apparently.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This deal looks good for both parties :  The instant transaction involves Sprint leasing from CSL certain 700 MHz and 1.9 GHz

spectrum in six counties in Tennessee and five counties in Arkansas

 

The nine counties are: Crittenden, Cross, Lee, Phillips and St. Francis, AR and Fayette,
Haywood, Shelby and Tipton, TN. In Crittenden, AR and Fayette, Sheldy and Tipton, TN
Sprint’s total attributable spectrum already exceeded the spectrum screen threshold.

 

The instant transaction also involves CSL leasing or subleasing from Sprint certain 800 MHz, 1.9 GHz and 2.5 GHz spectrum in four counties in Florida and five counties in Mississippi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's spectrum already exceeding the threshold. Is this the new "include all spectrum like it's the same" dumb threshold?

 

Also, heck yes Sprint should go for 700 A deployment in Memphis. Aggregate B12 and B26. That would be excellent.

 

I'm shocked Sprint went for B12 there but they should be going for it in remaining markets now that it's supported on Sprint devices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's spectrum already exceeding the threshold. Is this the new "include all spectrum like it's the same" dumb threshold?

 

Also, heck yes Sprint should go for 700 A deployment in Memphis. Aggregate B12 and B26. That would be excellent.

 

I'm shocked Sprint went for B12 there but they should be going for it in remaining markets now that it's supported on Sprint devices.

You cannot aggregate sub 1 ghz spectrum. Furthermore 700a is blocked by a local station.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Furthermore 700a is blocked by a local station.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

That doesn't really matter here, I don't think.  It's a one time expense of maybe $1 million and there are plenty of other open channels WPXX could be moved to.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Something odd with my Pixel 2 XL yesterday: in Itawamba County (on the border with AL east of Tupelo) my phone would connect to CSpire's LTE network but I couldn't get any data session to work ('x' on the signal strength indicator) - although I had no trouble roaming on AT&T LTE in NW Alabama earlier. But perhaps more interesting is that at least some of the towers were broadcasting on Band 25, which is the first evidence I've seen of a RRPP partner deploying on Sprint's spectrum. I also saw some Band 12 (presumably the 700 A block spectrum CSpire bought).

I haven't seen any evidence of Sprint deployment on Band 12 in Memphis so far but I'll keep an eye out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2017 at 4:33 PM, lordsutch said:

Something odd with my Pixel 2 XL yesterday: in Itawamba County (on the border with AL east of Tupelo) my phone would connect to CSpire's LTE network but I couldn't get any data session to work ('x' on the signal strength indicator) - although I had no trouble roaming on AT&T LTE in NW Alabama earlier. But perhaps more interesting is that at least some of the towers were broadcasting on Band 25, which is the first evidence I've seen of a RRPP partner deploying on Sprint's spectrum. I also saw some Band 12 (presumably the 700 A block spectrum CSpire bought).

I haven't seen any evidence of Sprint deployment on Band 12 in Memphis so far but I'll keep an eye out.

Are you sure it was the G block and not just At&t using MFBI on their PCS band? Because I've gotten LTE roaming to show up as B25 from At&T's F+C block

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure it was the G block and not just At&t using MFBI on their PCS band? Because I've gotten LTE roaming to show up as B25 from At&T's F+C block
Att does MFBI b25 and 26.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Att does MFBI b25 and 26.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Now I've had a chance to look through the log, it was definitely not AT&T; it was CSpire (311-230) MFBI (band 2/25), EARFCN 8440 (1970 MHz downlink). There was also quite a bit of band 12, EARFCN 5145; while the phone would register on the network I never got a successful data session and actually had to reboot to get it to connect again to LTE when I got into Sprint coverage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2017 at 4:33 PM, lordsutch said:

Something odd with my Pixel 2 XL yesterday: in Itawamba County (on the border with AL east of Tupelo) my phone would connect to CSpire's LTE network but I couldn't get any data session to work ('x' on the signal strength indicator) - although I had no trouble roaming on AT&T LTE in NW Alabama earlier. But perhaps more interesting is that at least some of the towers were broadcasting on Band 25, which is the first evidence I've seen of a RRPP partner deploying on Sprint's spectrum. I also saw some Band 12 (presumably the 700 A block spectrum CSpire bought).

I haven't seen any evidence of Sprint deployment on Band 12 in Memphis so far but I'll keep an eye out.

NexTech Wireless in Kansas and Colorado has deployed Band 25 LTE in the G block all along I-70 from Goodland, KS to just east of Denver. This happened back in May and June. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had no more luck on the way back; my Pixel 2 XL wouldn't even connect to 1X or 3G on CSpire. My Nexus 6 on Project Fi wouldn't connect either when I forced it to connect via CDMA/LTE using the *#*#FISPR#*#* dialer code.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well. 
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...