Jump to content

The Wall

  • entries
    402
  • comments
    6,082
  • views
    4,750,452

Contributors to this blog

Nashville Network Vision/LTE Deployment schedule update

S4GRU

11,051 views

blog-0350692001340894367.jpg

by Robert Herron

Sprint 4G Rollout Updates

Thursday, June 28, 2012 - 12:59 PM MDT

 

The next market in our Network Vision/LTE deployment schedule update series is The Music City...Nashville. The Nashville market has yet to be announced by Sprint, but is expected to be announced in the near future. Perhaps around the time of the first market launches on July 15th?

 

The Sprint Nashville market encompasses all of the Sprint native coverage in eastern Tennessee, and the Tri-Cities area of Western Virginia. This includes the Nashville, Chattanooga, Knoxville, Clarksville and the Tri-Cities (Johnson City/Kingsport/Bristol). Sprint's Network Vision OEM Ericsson is scheduled to begin mobilizing in this area with its subcontractors in late July. Completed Network Vision sites should start coming online before the end of August.

 

Nashville Market Launch

 

It was Sprint's original plan to launch markets when they reached 50% of sites converted to Network Vision. However, it has now been determined that Sprint will move up launches sooner than 50% completion in several markets. This is likely to maintain a Mid 2012 launch in markets that have already been announced. However, in an unannounced market like Nashville, we don't know if they will resume pushing back market launches to 50%, or if they will now settle on a 40% completion to be the new normal for market launches.

 

If Sprint waits for 50% completion to launch the Nashville market, it would make the launch month to be December (should the OEM stay on schedule). If they plan on a 40% market completion for launch, that would be November. You may think that 40% - 50% site completion is not enough to launch LTE service, but it would provide pretty good coverage. Even Verizon doesn't launch on all sites in a market initially. Usually less than 50%, then filling in with more and more sites every few months.

 

gallery_1_2_73929.jpg

Anticipated Sites Complete at Market Launch. According to the Network Vision schedules that S4GRU has reviewed, if Sprint launched the market in November, these are the anticipated sites that would likely have LTE complete at that time. This would provide fairly good LTE coverage over many parts of the market. Some sites are scheduled to be live in the Tri-Cities at the time. However, Chattanooga and Knoxville sites won't start until early 2013.

 

Schedule details and the bottom line

 

We currently do not have a date that Sprint will formally "launch" the Nashville market. It is difficult to try to pick a date now this far out. And we know Sprint won't want to do that. But we will take a stab at it. In looking at the schedule as of today, it would indicate a November market launch (going on a 40% - 50% completion for launch). But there is no way to know if Ericsson and their subcontractors will actually hit their schedule dates this early in the deployment for this market. We will be able to gauge better after a few months of production.

 

Ericsson will need to hit a production rate of 85 sites per month to stay on schedule. This will be a difficult rate to achieve and maintain consistently. Guessing now and based on the best production rates thus far, I could see this market taking longer to complete. Since they should be starting soon, we will be able to understand how things are going in a few months.

 

S4GRU has examined the schedule in great detail in this market and sees that most of the sites are scheduled to be complete by March 2013. However, there may be a few sporadic sites that will linger past the completion.

 

800px-Knoxville_TN_skyline.jpg

Photo of Knoxville skyline provided courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

 

NOTE: S4GRU Sponsor Members can track regular updates of

Network Vision sites completed nationwide. Completed sites are shown in an interactive Google Maps interface. Information about sponsorship can be found here: S4GRU Sponsorship



12 Comments


Recommended Comments

They should remove that giant disco ball. Makes the whole skyline look tacky.

 

Another awesome update!

Share this comment


Link to comment

They should remove that giant disco ball. Makes the whole skyline look tacky.Another awesome update!

 

I think it is from the 1982 World's Fair, if memory serves. I am just old enough to remember that. I wanted to go. :)

 

Robert

Share this comment


Link to comment

It is from the World's Fair, now all they need to do is install a cellular tower on it.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

You forgot to include the northwest corner of GA as being sprinkled with LTE in this wave. The carpet capital of the world needs a little Sprint LTE loving too! ;)

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

I am anxiously awaiting the announcement of when Chattanooga will launch 4G services. I have been waiting since I purchased my HTC EVO 4G phone.

Share this comment


Link to comment

I am anxiously awaiting the announcement of when Chattanooga will launch 4G services. I have been waiting since I purchased my HTC EVO 4G phone.

 

Sprint is no longer expanding 4G WiMax service. That deployment stopped in early 2011. Sprint is now only deploying 4G LTE, which is not supported by the HTC EVO 4G. Only LTE device support the LTE network.

 

Robert

Share this comment


Link to comment
Sprint Nashville market encompasses all of the Sprint native coverage in eastern Tennessee

 

I wonder if this will include the *2* towers serving the area where I live (off I-75 North of Knoxville--postal codes 37766 and 37757). I saw another post where work was underway in Knoxville.. I still have little hope for our isolated Sprint towers.

Share this comment


Link to comment

I wonder if this will include the *2* towers serving the area where I live (off I-75 North of Knoxville--postal codes 37766 and 37757). I saw another post where work was underway in Knoxville.. I still have little hope for our isolated Sprint towers.

 

Knoxville is supposed to be at least in a prelaunch phase of LTE deployed before the end of the year according to the latest from Sprint. We shall see.

 

Robert

Share this comment


Link to comment

I posted in the main market thread about this, but I found no evidence of eHRPD yet in the Knoxville area on my way back home today. No sign of it at all from Bristol all the way down to roughly I-40 MM300 heading towards Nashville away from Knoxville (just inside the county line of my home county, Putnam).

Share this comment


Link to comment

eHRPD is now showing up in Knoxville, near downtown west. Also Sevierville, Pigeon Forge, Bristol, Johnson City and Kingsport are showing eHRPD.

  • Like 1

Share this comment


Link to comment

Today I got a 4G LTE signal in Cleveland, TN. The signal remained all day! Approximately 3 bars as well.....

Share this comment


Link to comment

I was in Kingsport yesterday and it was the first time that I picked up 4G on my HTC EVO LTE. It was near the Eastman plant. I also picked it up on I81 near the Greenville exit and just south of Exit 8 at Morristown. I then picked it up on I40 near the Jefferson City exit.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • The Wall Articles

  • Wall Comments

    • to me rural coverage matters most....because i like being able to make phone calls and send texts in remote areas of the country ...i dont care about speeds i just care about per square mile coverage and over all usability and reliability
    • Tell us how you really feel @MrZorbatron!

      I think that most cellular players exaggerate their coverage. Yes, I suspected a long time ago that T-Mobile was one of the most egregious. Now according to the merger presentation, they will end up with 85,000 macro sites. That will be enough to match the coverage of pretty much everybody.

      Like you, I appreciate not having dropped calls or undelivered texts. In my area on my T-Mobile MVNO, I don't get any but can't say it won't happen elsewhere. Once Charter offers service via their Verizon MVNO, I think I will move my 4 personal lines there. My business line will stay on Sprint/T-Mobile, well, because I can't control that.
    • I do not welcome any part of this.  I don't think T-Mobile really cares about doing anything they say they care about.  I have seen how truly bad their network is in the ways that matter for essential communication, and I want nothing to do with it.  Say what you want about Verizon, but the one thing they have in common with Sprint is that they have historically built out a solid network before trying to make it extremely fast.  I don't care about 50 Mbps to my phone.  I care about calls that don't get disconnected constantly.  I care about that stock trade getting through when I send it, even if carried by EVDO, because EVDO still gets it through. Sprint's "Outdoor coverage" maps might seem exaggerated to some, but T-Mobile's maps are a complete joke.  Maybe Michigan is a bubble, the only state where this is true, but it really is very true here.  T-Mobile is the network of dropped and undelivered calls, mysterious disconnection, and "call failed" error messages. If this goes through, look for me at the nearest Verizon store because price to me is absolutely irrelevant.  I see two things happening if this merger goes through:  1:  Sprint spectrum is used to bolster capacity at T-Mobile sites, and 2:  As much of the current Sprint network as possible goes away, even if it means losing sites that would provide valuable fill-in density.  I saw the latter happen with Sprint and Nextel, after they insisted that all Nextel sites that could serve to increase Sprint coverage would be used.  Similarly, there were locations T-Mobile could have used MetroPCS locations to improve their own coverage but didn't, even where it left holes in their network.
    • Not when Verizon just bought 1GHz of mmwave spectrum. Those were the policies of the past. If it does not get approved, it would the loss of jobs and the fact that it might not be good for consumers. Although when I look at the table on this page, comparing unlimited plans, it is already evident that the other three are not really competing and Sprint's lower prices are not working since they did not manage to steal anybody from the other other three. To me it is evident that were Sprint to remain independent they need massive investment in their network since competing on price is not enough anymore and low prices just deprive their network of investment.
    • And I would definitely say that merger probably or probably not won't be approved. If not I would have to say it would be on the grounds of cellular asset divestiture.
×