Jump to content

strung

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by strung

  1. I'm leaning towards the HTC: SVDO, Hd Voice, non-pentile display. OTOH the gnex has the awesome curved screen, unlocked booloader and pure AOSP.
  2. Are they posting NV upgrades on network.sprint.com now in addition to the "band aid" fixes? It seems like there are more blips popping up on the map, but I could just be off base.
  3. Good speeds. Pings are kinda high.
  4. Will devices maintain the same IP address handing off from 3g to LTE and vice versa? One of the problems with the WiMAX implementation is different networks / different IP addresses creates a not-so-seamless experience. The goofs up streaming music/video applications for example.
  5. Nice. I get similar numbers in Minneapolis Minnesota area.
  6. Reminds me of the loss of connection issue with the Galaxy S II that was patched 3 months later.
  7. Typical New York. Taxing everything any anything
  8. Perhaps the phone is bouncing between newly upgraded towers and the older towers?
  9. strung

    HTC EVO 4G LTE

    I suspect embedded SIM or virtual SIM would be to still allow for billing "by-device" as they have different rate plans for SERO, regular plans, and feature phones.
  10. If anyone knows anything about voice latency, with regards to HD Voice, I'm quite curious.
  11. will HD Voice have less latency?
  12. cool cool. i'm shocked and excited about doing hd voice already. i had assumed that was 2-3 years out still.
  13. Yes!! I can't wait for better voice quality!!
  14. HD VOICE????????????????????????????!?!?
  15. Probably tower saturation or something like that on the tower end. There's no "magic" to radio versions that people seem to think there is.
  16. iPhone/iPad user here, and I firmly believe Android is prettier and easier to use than iOS, and Google Maps Navigation is amazing on Android.
  17. what's drive testing? driving around, testing?
  18. My ping to the SIP/RTP server had been under 40ms (one way would be 1/2 that, or 20ms then) and when I used a VoIP adapter I set the buffer to 10ms the minimum. Yet VoIP voice lag was still about 300ms (one way) or about double that of a cell phone. That means VoIP was adding about 270ms somehow, after traversing the internet to the VoIP terminal. Yuck. I never measured with airrave/tmobile but subjectively it felt about the same using the "click test", just call yourself on a landline (so hold one phone up to each ear), and "click"/pop your mouth in one end, and you can get a good feel the lag. If you use google voice try adding that into the mix too for fun, GV adds another 130ms lag on top
  19. That's interesting and I was thinking about that. Maybe in New Mexico you are a lot closer to the POTS termination. That POTS termination is like long distance lag in addition to the internet lag. I think in Minnesota I've got the latency to the data center, plus the POTS network latency on top of that...gets pretty high, I suspect data centers are on west/east coast. Maybe near the coasts it's better. Just a hunch. But I've tried many VoIP sprint, tmobile, a few other voip providers and Airrave in MN on a fast low lag conneciton and its been noticably bad for voice calls -- not just me but the people on the other end basically say "i can't talk to you over this connection"!
  20. Cellular phone calling is about 150 ms lag, which is pretty bad already (2 cell phones then is 300 ms) Wifi calling tends to be double that, and makes for a bad to terrible experience...1/2 second and longer delays piss people off. Also wifi calling often has volume issues, and the higher latency results in echo and bigger echo cancellation problems.
×
×
  • Create New...